What the Supreme Court said about Circumstantial Evidence to establish guilt [Read judgment]April 16 2018
The Supreme Court today held that in cases where prosecution rests on circumstantial evidence, it must place and prove all the necessary circumstances, which would constitute a complete chain without a snap.
A Bench of Justices AK Sikri and RK Agrawal held that guilt of an accused in a criminal case cannot be fixed based merely on incriminatory circumstance unless it is backed by “reliable and clinching evidence”.
The Court was deciding a case of . . .
You need to have an active subscription to view this content.
With a premium account you get:
- One year of unrestrcited access to previous interviews, columns and articles
- One year access to all archival material
- Access to all Bar & Bench reports