Confession

Confession by accused under Section 50 PMLA is not judicial confession; can't be used against co-accused: Delhi High Court
Facts sourced from accused who is not in "formal" police custody admissible as evidence: Supreme Court
Extra-judicial confession is weak evidence especially when retracted during trial: Supreme Court
Delhi riots not Anti-Hindu, all communities felt the consequences: Delhi Court
Make sure it is not brushed under carpet: Delhi High Court seeks report from Police on enquiry into leak of alleged confession of riots accused
Officers under Section 53 of NDPS Act are police; statement under Section 67 is confessional statement: Supreme Court in 2:1 judgment
True and complete disclosure the heart of confession: Calcutta HC pulls up police for recording leading statements as Confessional Statement
Retracted confession of co-accused cannot be sole ground for conviction: Calcutta HC
Audio/video recording of witness statements should be implemented to deter hostile witnesses: Madras HC seeks views of the Bar
Admissibility of Statements made to the Police: What Supreme Court held [Read Judgment]
Confession is not substantive evidence against co-accused, reiterates Supreme Court
What the Supreme Court said about Circumstantial Evidence to establish guilt [Read judgment]
Bar and Bench - Indian Legal news
www.barandbench.com