Supreme Court.1. Anand Rai v. Union of India.[Item 76 in court 1 – Writ Petition (Crl) 114/2015].Watch evening updates to know more about this case..Today in court: This case seeks CBI investigation into the scam surrounding the entrance exams to private medical and dental colleges in the State of Madhya Pradesh. The petitioners had approached the Supreme Court contending that the scam is linked to the Vyapam scam and separate investigation into it “will not make sense”. Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal appeared for the petitioner and submitted that the matter should be considered along with the petitions relating to Vyapam scam..The Court issued notice to the Centre in the case on whether the CBI should probe the matter or not..2. Varsha Yadav v. High Court of Allahabad & Anr..[Item 20 in court 5 – SLP (Crl) 5279-5280/2015].A fresh Special Leave Petition..This case could not be tracked. Any lead/ information on this case will be appreciated..3. Delhi Grameen Samaj & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors..[Item 6 in court 4 – Writ Petition (Civil) 184/2015].Today in court: This petition has challenged the re-promulgation of land acquisition ordinance. Senior Advocate Indira Jaising appeared for the petitioner while Additional Solicitor General Pinky Anand appeared for the Central government. A Division Bench presided by Justice JS Khehar issued notice to the Centre and sought its response within 4 weeks..Delhi High Court.4. Ekta Jain v. State and Anr.[Item 10, Court 32- Crl.M.C. 2120/2015].Plea to cancel RK Pachauri’s anticipatory bail. When the matter was last heard, Justice SP Garg had sought the views of the Delhi Police, and adjourned the matter..Today in court: Justice SP Garg adjourned the matter to September 30 for filing a rejoinder affidavit. The Respondents said that their replies have been sent to the Petitioner and the status report has also been filed..Despite repeated requests made by the Petitioner’s counsel to commence arguments in the matter, Justice Garg categorically held that the Bench will hear the issue only after the reply is filed..He also stated that at this point in time, he was not concerned with the anticipatory bail conditions that were imposed on Pachauri and whether he had flouted them or not..The matter will now be heard at 2.15 pm on September 30.
Supreme Court.1. Anand Rai v. Union of India.[Item 76 in court 1 – Writ Petition (Crl) 114/2015].Watch evening updates to know more about this case..Today in court: This case seeks CBI investigation into the scam surrounding the entrance exams to private medical and dental colleges in the State of Madhya Pradesh. The petitioners had approached the Supreme Court contending that the scam is linked to the Vyapam scam and separate investigation into it “will not make sense”. Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal appeared for the petitioner and submitted that the matter should be considered along with the petitions relating to Vyapam scam..The Court issued notice to the Centre in the case on whether the CBI should probe the matter or not..2. Varsha Yadav v. High Court of Allahabad & Anr..[Item 20 in court 5 – SLP (Crl) 5279-5280/2015].A fresh Special Leave Petition..This case could not be tracked. Any lead/ information on this case will be appreciated..3. Delhi Grameen Samaj & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors..[Item 6 in court 4 – Writ Petition (Civil) 184/2015].Today in court: This petition has challenged the re-promulgation of land acquisition ordinance. Senior Advocate Indira Jaising appeared for the petitioner while Additional Solicitor General Pinky Anand appeared for the Central government. A Division Bench presided by Justice JS Khehar issued notice to the Centre and sought its response within 4 weeks..Delhi High Court.4. Ekta Jain v. State and Anr.[Item 10, Court 32- Crl.M.C. 2120/2015].Plea to cancel RK Pachauri’s anticipatory bail. When the matter was last heard, Justice SP Garg had sought the views of the Delhi Police, and adjourned the matter..Today in court: Justice SP Garg adjourned the matter to September 30 for filing a rejoinder affidavit. The Respondents said that their replies have been sent to the Petitioner and the status report has also been filed..Despite repeated requests made by the Petitioner’s counsel to commence arguments in the matter, Justice Garg categorically held that the Bench will hear the issue only after the reply is filed..He also stated that at this point in time, he was not concerned with the anticipatory bail conditions that were imposed on Pachauri and whether he had flouted them or not..The matter will now be heard at 2.15 pm on September 30.