Supreme Court.1. Union of India & Ors. v. Madras High Court Practising Advocates Association.[Item 6 in court 3 – SLP (Civil) 31665/2011].Bench: Anil R Dave J., AK Goel J..Check evening updates to know more about this case..Today in court: This case could not be tracked..2. Rajasthan High Court v. Preeti Singh & Anr. .[Item 2 in court 6 – IA 2/2015 in SLP(Civil) 14323/2015].Bench: Jasti Chelameswar J., AM Sapre J..Check evening updates to know more about this case..Today in court: This case was not taken up today..Delhi High Court.1. Govt of NCT of Delhi v. Union of India.[Item 1 in Court 13 – WP (C) 5888/2015].Bench: VP Vaish J..A petition filed by the Delhi Govt challenging the MHA notification of May 21 which deprived the Anti-Corruption Bureau from taking cognizance of offences against officers, employees and functionaries of the Central Government..On the last hearing, the Govt had submitted that Article 239AA of the Constitution was categorical in its scope while outlining the constitutional role and significance of the Chief Minister. Senior Counsel Dayan Krishnan appearing for the Delhi Govt is expected to resume his arguments today..Today in Court: Despite posting it to be heard at the end of board, due to paucity of time the part-heard matter was not taken up. It will now be heard on September 9 when Dayan Krishnan is expected to resume his arguments.
Supreme Court.1. Union of India & Ors. v. Madras High Court Practising Advocates Association.[Item 6 in court 3 – SLP (Civil) 31665/2011].Bench: Anil R Dave J., AK Goel J..Check evening updates to know more about this case..Today in court: This case could not be tracked..2. Rajasthan High Court v. Preeti Singh & Anr. .[Item 2 in court 6 – IA 2/2015 in SLP(Civil) 14323/2015].Bench: Jasti Chelameswar J., AM Sapre J..Check evening updates to know more about this case..Today in court: This case was not taken up today..Delhi High Court.1. Govt of NCT of Delhi v. Union of India.[Item 1 in Court 13 – WP (C) 5888/2015].Bench: VP Vaish J..A petition filed by the Delhi Govt challenging the MHA notification of May 21 which deprived the Anti-Corruption Bureau from taking cognizance of offences against officers, employees and functionaries of the Central Government..On the last hearing, the Govt had submitted that Article 239AA of the Constitution was categorical in its scope while outlining the constitutional role and significance of the Chief Minister. Senior Counsel Dayan Krishnan appearing for the Delhi Govt is expected to resume his arguments today..Today in Court: Despite posting it to be heard at the end of board, due to paucity of time the part-heard matter was not taken up. It will now be heard on September 9 when Dayan Krishnan is expected to resume his arguments.