Supreme Court's verdict on Essar establishes much more than Section 29A jurisprudenceOctober 5 2018
The Supreme Court has given its first (and final) ruling, interpreting Section 29A of the IBC. The precedent set in the case of Essar Steel by Justices Rohinton Nariman and Indu Malhotra, will now serve as a template for Section 29A (in)eligibility, just like the Innoventive ruling has served as a precedent for the IBC.
Arguably, Essar could be the most dramatic episode in two . . .
You need to have an active subscription to view this content.
With a premium account you get:
- One year of unrestrcited access to previous interviews, columns and articles
- One year access to all archival material
- Access to all Bar & Bench reports