The Court explained that Section 313 CrPC envisions a reasonable opportunity to be given to accused where adverse evidence is presented in the form of questions for them to articulate their defence.
The Court said that the questions to the accused must be framed in simple language and only incriminatory evidence must be picked out from oral and documentary evidence.
The High Court said that mixing of the distinct facts and questions does not give a fair opportunity to the accused to explain the circumstances and this may vitiate the trial.
Under this section, the accused is given an opportunity to offer an explanation after the Prosecution has closed evidence. This opportunity is a valuable right and cannot be brushed aside lightly, the ...
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta who commenced his arguments in the PMLA case before the Supreme Court on February 23, gave a slew of statistics and international data on the origins of PMLA and functio ...
The amicus submitted that in absence of the petitioner having a remedy to file appeal, it would be justified to invoke the High Court's power of superintendence conferred by Article 227 of the Constit ...
"While the evil may be rife in society, it is equally true that there is abundant false implication," the Court commented about cases under Section 498A IPC.
Section 12 of the GW Act empowers family courts to issue interlocutory orders for the production of minors and temporary protection of persons and property.