Supreme Court of India.1. Dr. Ambedkar Law University, Rep. by its Registrar v. B Ashok and Ors..[Item 59 in court 3 – SLP(C) 33653/2015].Bench: JS Khehar, Rohinton Fali Nariman JJ..A fresh petition. Check evening updates to know more..2. Extra Judl. Exec.Victim Families Assn & Anr v. Union of India & Anr.[Item 302 in court 8 – Writ Petition (Crl.) 129/2012].Bench: Madan B Lokur, UU Lalit JJ..Case pertaining to extra judicial killing in Manipur. Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi Read more about the hearing here..Today in court: Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi is continuing with his submissions. The matter will now be heard in January 2016..3. Surjit Singh v. Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh Thr. Its Registrar and Anr..[Item 27 in court 1 – SLP(C) 33696/2015].Bench: Chief Justice TS Thakur, AK Sikri, R Banumathi JJ..A fresh petition..Today in court: This case pertaining to a service dispute involving a former civil judge in Punjab, was dismissed. Advocate KS Chauhan appeared for the petitioner judge..4. Bar Council Of India and Anr. v B Ashok and Ors..[Item 35 in court 3 – SLP(C) 33742/2015].Bench: JS Khehar, Rohinton Fali Nariman JJ..A fresh petition. Check evening updates to know more..5. Shobhha De v. Chairman, Maharashtra Legislature Secretariat and Ors..[Item 8 in court 4 – Writ Petition (Civil) 233/2015].Bench: Dipak Misra, PC Pant JJ..A petition filed by Shobhaa De challenging the notice of privilege motion moved against her by the Maharashtra Legislative Assembly for her tweets against a government order..The government order mandated that every multiplex should screen at least one Marathi film between 6 pm to 9 pm everyday. De had taken a dig at the order and tweeted:.“No more pop corn at multiplexes in Mumbai? Dahi misal and vada pav only. To go better with the Marathi movies at prime time.”.The Supreme Court had stayed the privilege motion against her in April and sought the response of Maharashtra Legislative Secretariat. The Court had allowed the Maharashtra government to implead itself in the matter..Today in court: The Court closed the case after De’s lawyer informed the Court that the Maharashtra Assembly accepted De’s reply to the notice of privilege motion..6. Food Safety and Standards Authority of India v. M/S. Nestle India Ltd. and Ors..[Item 39 in court 4 – SLP(C) NO. 33251/2015].Bench: Dipak Misra, PC Pant JJ..The appeal by Food Safety and Standards Authority of India against the decision of the Bombay High Court lifting the ban imposed on Maggi noodles. Read more here..Today in court: Senior Advocate Harish Salve appeared for Nestle India and submitted that Nestle would file its response to the petition before January 5. The Court accepted the same and posted the case for January 13..7. Nipun Saxena and Anr v. Union Of India And Ors..[Item 301 in court 8 – Writ Petition (Civil) 565/2012].Bench: Madan B Lokur, UU Lalit JJ..A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by a student of the National Law University, Delhi. The petition has sought to draw the Court’s attention to the manner in which private buses operate in and around the National Capital Region. The reliefs sought by the Petitioner include revocation of licenses of those permit holders who are in violation of the Motor Vehicles Act, an enquiry into the “antecedents” of such drivers/license holders and examination of the validity of the “two finger” test as a medical procedure. The petition has also sought the creation of a Criminal Injuries Compensation Board (CICB) for offences such as that of rape..When the matter was heard in 2013, the Court had issued notice to the Respondents..Today in court: This case was deleted from the list..Competition Appellate Tribunal (COMPAT).For judgment.Lafarge India Ltd Vs Competition Commission of India & Ors. [Lead matter in a batch of connected matters].Bench- GS Singhvi J., Mr. Rajeev Kher.Batch of appeals filed by cement companies challenging a verdict of Competition Commission of India (CCI) that had imposed a penalty of nearly 6000 crore rupees on the companies citing ‘cartelization’ of the cement market..Today in Court- You can read the report here. .Delhi High Court.1. Yu Televentures Pvt Ltd Vs TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM Ericcson (Publ) & Ors and Rahul Sharma & Ors Vs TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM Ericcson (Publ) & Ors..[Item 12-13 Court 1- LPA 888/2015, LPA 889/2015].Bench: Chief Justice G Rohini, Jayant Nath J..Appeals filed by Yu Televentures, a subsidiary company of Micromax and the founder of Micromax Rahul Sharma against the adverse orders passed against the company by a Single Bench, recently. Bailable warrants had been issued by the Single Bench against directors of Yu which included Rahul Sharma..Today in Court- Warrants against all the directors were discharged. Senior Advocates Gopal Subramanium and Pratibha M Singh appeared for Ericcson while Senior Advocates PV Kapur, Sandeep Sethi and Dayan Krishnan appeared for Micromax and its directors. The matter will now be heard on December 15..2. Subramanian Swamy Vs Raju Through Juvenile Justice Board & Ors..[Item 21, Court 1- W.P.(C) 11511/2015].Bench: Chief Justice G Rohini, Jayant Nath J..Check evening updates to know more about this case..Today in Court- You can read the report here. .3. All India Footwear Manufacturers & Retailers Association & Ors. Vs Union of India & Ors..[Item 31, Court 9- WP (C) 7479/2015].Bench: RS Endlaw J..Petition filed by the All India Footwear Manufacturers and Retailers Association alleging violation of the government’s FDI policy by e-commerce majors..On the last date of hearing, the Bench had granted time of four weeks for completing investigations into all the 21 e-commerce websites for determination of any violation of norms..Today in Court- An association, All India Traders Confederation sought impleadment in the matter. The Court however adjourned the matter to December 21 where it said that it will hear the issue of impleadment as well..Bombay High Court.1.The State of Maharashtra V. Mirza Himayat Inayat Baig.[ Item 1 in Court 11 – CONF (criminal) /4/2013 ].Bench : Justice Naresh H. Patil and Justice S.B. Shukre.The hearing in the German Bakery case will continue today..2. Smt. Vaijayata Deepak Warke and Ors V. State Election Commission and Ors..[ Item 1 in Court 12 – WP( civil) /11547/2015 ].Bench : Justice M.S. Sonak.Check evening updates..3. Maharashtra Federation of University and college V.The State of Maharashtra and two Ors..[ Item 20 Court 3 – WP (civil)/4509/2014 ].Bench : Justice Anoop V Mohta and Justice AA Sayed.Check evening updates.
Supreme Court of India.1. Dr. Ambedkar Law University, Rep. by its Registrar v. B Ashok and Ors..[Item 59 in court 3 – SLP(C) 33653/2015].Bench: JS Khehar, Rohinton Fali Nariman JJ..A fresh petition. Check evening updates to know more..2. Extra Judl. Exec.Victim Families Assn & Anr v. Union of India & Anr.[Item 302 in court 8 – Writ Petition (Crl.) 129/2012].Bench: Madan B Lokur, UU Lalit JJ..Case pertaining to extra judicial killing in Manipur. Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi Read more about the hearing here..Today in court: Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi is continuing with his submissions. The matter will now be heard in January 2016..3. Surjit Singh v. Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh Thr. Its Registrar and Anr..[Item 27 in court 1 – SLP(C) 33696/2015].Bench: Chief Justice TS Thakur, AK Sikri, R Banumathi JJ..A fresh petition..Today in court: This case pertaining to a service dispute involving a former civil judge in Punjab, was dismissed. Advocate KS Chauhan appeared for the petitioner judge..4. Bar Council Of India and Anr. v B Ashok and Ors..[Item 35 in court 3 – SLP(C) 33742/2015].Bench: JS Khehar, Rohinton Fali Nariman JJ..A fresh petition. Check evening updates to know more..5. Shobhha De v. Chairman, Maharashtra Legislature Secretariat and Ors..[Item 8 in court 4 – Writ Petition (Civil) 233/2015].Bench: Dipak Misra, PC Pant JJ..A petition filed by Shobhaa De challenging the notice of privilege motion moved against her by the Maharashtra Legislative Assembly for her tweets against a government order..The government order mandated that every multiplex should screen at least one Marathi film between 6 pm to 9 pm everyday. De had taken a dig at the order and tweeted:.“No more pop corn at multiplexes in Mumbai? Dahi misal and vada pav only. To go better with the Marathi movies at prime time.”.The Supreme Court had stayed the privilege motion against her in April and sought the response of Maharashtra Legislative Secretariat. The Court had allowed the Maharashtra government to implead itself in the matter..Today in court: The Court closed the case after De’s lawyer informed the Court that the Maharashtra Assembly accepted De’s reply to the notice of privilege motion..6. Food Safety and Standards Authority of India v. M/S. Nestle India Ltd. and Ors..[Item 39 in court 4 – SLP(C) NO. 33251/2015].Bench: Dipak Misra, PC Pant JJ..The appeal by Food Safety and Standards Authority of India against the decision of the Bombay High Court lifting the ban imposed on Maggi noodles. Read more here..Today in court: Senior Advocate Harish Salve appeared for Nestle India and submitted that Nestle would file its response to the petition before January 5. The Court accepted the same and posted the case for January 13..7. Nipun Saxena and Anr v. Union Of India And Ors..[Item 301 in court 8 – Writ Petition (Civil) 565/2012].Bench: Madan B Lokur, UU Lalit JJ..A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by a student of the National Law University, Delhi. The petition has sought to draw the Court’s attention to the manner in which private buses operate in and around the National Capital Region. The reliefs sought by the Petitioner include revocation of licenses of those permit holders who are in violation of the Motor Vehicles Act, an enquiry into the “antecedents” of such drivers/license holders and examination of the validity of the “two finger” test as a medical procedure. The petition has also sought the creation of a Criminal Injuries Compensation Board (CICB) for offences such as that of rape..When the matter was heard in 2013, the Court had issued notice to the Respondents..Today in court: This case was deleted from the list..Competition Appellate Tribunal (COMPAT).For judgment.Lafarge India Ltd Vs Competition Commission of India & Ors. [Lead matter in a batch of connected matters].Bench- GS Singhvi J., Mr. Rajeev Kher.Batch of appeals filed by cement companies challenging a verdict of Competition Commission of India (CCI) that had imposed a penalty of nearly 6000 crore rupees on the companies citing ‘cartelization’ of the cement market..Today in Court- You can read the report here. .Delhi High Court.1. Yu Televentures Pvt Ltd Vs TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM Ericcson (Publ) & Ors and Rahul Sharma & Ors Vs TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM Ericcson (Publ) & Ors..[Item 12-13 Court 1- LPA 888/2015, LPA 889/2015].Bench: Chief Justice G Rohini, Jayant Nath J..Appeals filed by Yu Televentures, a subsidiary company of Micromax and the founder of Micromax Rahul Sharma against the adverse orders passed against the company by a Single Bench, recently. Bailable warrants had been issued by the Single Bench against directors of Yu which included Rahul Sharma..Today in Court- Warrants against all the directors were discharged. Senior Advocates Gopal Subramanium and Pratibha M Singh appeared for Ericcson while Senior Advocates PV Kapur, Sandeep Sethi and Dayan Krishnan appeared for Micromax and its directors. The matter will now be heard on December 15..2. Subramanian Swamy Vs Raju Through Juvenile Justice Board & Ors..[Item 21, Court 1- W.P.(C) 11511/2015].Bench: Chief Justice G Rohini, Jayant Nath J..Check evening updates to know more about this case..Today in Court- You can read the report here. .3. All India Footwear Manufacturers & Retailers Association & Ors. Vs Union of India & Ors..[Item 31, Court 9- WP (C) 7479/2015].Bench: RS Endlaw J..Petition filed by the All India Footwear Manufacturers and Retailers Association alleging violation of the government’s FDI policy by e-commerce majors..On the last date of hearing, the Bench had granted time of four weeks for completing investigations into all the 21 e-commerce websites for determination of any violation of norms..Today in Court- An association, All India Traders Confederation sought impleadment in the matter. The Court however adjourned the matter to December 21 where it said that it will hear the issue of impleadment as well..Bombay High Court.1.The State of Maharashtra V. Mirza Himayat Inayat Baig.[ Item 1 in Court 11 – CONF (criminal) /4/2013 ].Bench : Justice Naresh H. Patil and Justice S.B. Shukre.The hearing in the German Bakery case will continue today..2. Smt. Vaijayata Deepak Warke and Ors V. State Election Commission and Ors..[ Item 1 in Court 12 – WP( civil) /11547/2015 ].Bench : Justice M.S. Sonak.Check evening updates..3. Maharashtra Federation of University and college V.The State of Maharashtra and two Ors..[ Item 20 Court 3 – WP (civil)/4509/2014 ].Bench : Justice Anoop V Mohta and Justice AA Sayed.Check evening updates.
