Supreme Court of India.1. Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association and Anr. v. Union of India.[Item 501 in court 4 – Writ Petition (Civil) 13/2015].Bench: JS Khehar J., Jasti Chelameswar J., Madan B Lokur J., Kurian Joseph J., AK Goel J.The court will hear suggestions and recommendations to improve the collegium system..Read the full report here..Today in court: The Court today solicited suggestions on four aspects – 1. Transparency 2. Eligibility criteria 3. Secretariat and 4. Dealing with complaints. Additional Solicitor General Pinky Anand has been tasked with the collecting inputs from the side of the Respondents in the matter while Senior Advocate Arvind Datar will submit the suggestions from the petitioners’ side. The matter will now be heard on November 5..2. Shamnad Basheer v. Union of India & Ors. .[Item 7 in court 2 – Writ Petition (Civil) 600/2015].Bench: TS Thakur J., R Banumathi J..This is a petition filed by IP expert Shamnad Basheer seeking setting up of a permanent body to conduct the Common Law Admissions Test. The court had issued notice to the Centre, RGNLU and BCI on the last hearing in September..Today in court: The Respondents filed their counter affidavits in the case. The petitioner has now been given six weeks time to file rejoinder. The case will be listed in January 2016..3. Kanimozhi Karunanithi v. CBI & Anr..[Item 301 in court 1 at 2 pm- Writ Petition 120/20113].Bench: Chief Justice HL Dattu, AK Sikri J., Rohinton Nariman J..These are quashing petitions filed By Kanimozhi and Shahid Balwa against the 2G Special court proceedings..Today in court: The Court rejected the petitions observing that it will not entertain these petitions at this belated stage. The court has, however, allowed the accused to approach the High Court against the final order of the 2G Special court..Delhi High Court.Society for Voice of Human Rights & Justice Vs Union of India & Ors. .[Item 30, Court 1- WP (C) 10208/2015].Bench: Chief Justice G Rohini, Jayant Nath J. .A petition praying for cancellation of licenses issued to all homeopathic practitioners in the GNCT of Delhi..Today in Court: The Bench issued notice to the Delhi Govt and sought its response over the issue. The matter will now be heard on December 18..2. Green Cross Holdings Vs Intellectual Property Appellate Board & Anr. .[Item 53, Court 9- WP (C) 10266/2015].Bench: Rajiv Sahai Endlaw J. .A petition challenging a decision of the IPAB where the body rejected the patent application made by the Petitioner..Today in Court: The Bench wanted to know from the Petitioner as to what was the scope of interference under Article 226 in the matter since the decision was passed by a specialized body of technical members. It also said that an error in the judgment passed on merits, should not be the ground to prefer judicial review..However, it granted time to the Petitioner to show whether there was any scope of review and whether the conclusion arrived at by IPAB was such that no other reasonable person could have arrived at the said decision. The matter will now be heard on November 19.
Supreme Court of India.1. Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association and Anr. v. Union of India.[Item 501 in court 4 – Writ Petition (Civil) 13/2015].Bench: JS Khehar J., Jasti Chelameswar J., Madan B Lokur J., Kurian Joseph J., AK Goel J.The court will hear suggestions and recommendations to improve the collegium system..Read the full report here..Today in court: The Court today solicited suggestions on four aspects – 1. Transparency 2. Eligibility criteria 3. Secretariat and 4. Dealing with complaints. Additional Solicitor General Pinky Anand has been tasked with the collecting inputs from the side of the Respondents in the matter while Senior Advocate Arvind Datar will submit the suggestions from the petitioners’ side. The matter will now be heard on November 5..2. Shamnad Basheer v. Union of India & Ors. .[Item 7 in court 2 – Writ Petition (Civil) 600/2015].Bench: TS Thakur J., R Banumathi J..This is a petition filed by IP expert Shamnad Basheer seeking setting up of a permanent body to conduct the Common Law Admissions Test. The court had issued notice to the Centre, RGNLU and BCI on the last hearing in September..Today in court: The Respondents filed their counter affidavits in the case. The petitioner has now been given six weeks time to file rejoinder. The case will be listed in January 2016..3. Kanimozhi Karunanithi v. CBI & Anr..[Item 301 in court 1 at 2 pm- Writ Petition 120/20113].Bench: Chief Justice HL Dattu, AK Sikri J., Rohinton Nariman J..These are quashing petitions filed By Kanimozhi and Shahid Balwa against the 2G Special court proceedings..Today in court: The Court rejected the petitions observing that it will not entertain these petitions at this belated stage. The court has, however, allowed the accused to approach the High Court against the final order of the 2G Special court..Delhi High Court.Society for Voice of Human Rights & Justice Vs Union of India & Ors. .[Item 30, Court 1- WP (C) 10208/2015].Bench: Chief Justice G Rohini, Jayant Nath J. .A petition praying for cancellation of licenses issued to all homeopathic practitioners in the GNCT of Delhi..Today in Court: The Bench issued notice to the Delhi Govt and sought its response over the issue. The matter will now be heard on December 18..2. Green Cross Holdings Vs Intellectual Property Appellate Board & Anr. .[Item 53, Court 9- WP (C) 10266/2015].Bench: Rajiv Sahai Endlaw J. .A petition challenging a decision of the IPAB where the body rejected the patent application made by the Petitioner..Today in Court: The Bench wanted to know from the Petitioner as to what was the scope of interference under Article 226 in the matter since the decision was passed by a specialized body of technical members. It also said that an error in the judgment passed on merits, should not be the ground to prefer judicial review..However, it granted time to the Petitioner to show whether there was any scope of review and whether the conclusion arrived at by IPAB was such that no other reasonable person could have arrived at the said decision. The matter will now be heard on November 19.
