Gujarat High Court judge Justice Gita Gopi Wednesday recused from hearing the appeal filed by Congress leader Rahul Gandhi seeking stay on his conviction by a Magistrate court in a criminal defamation case against him [Rahul Gandhi vs Purnesh Modi]..Gandhi's appeal was mentioned before single-judge Justice Gopi. She however, said "not before me" and asked the advocate to approach the acting Chief Justice of the High Court, who can assign another bench for hearing the appeal..A sessions court in Surat had, on April 20, dismissed his plea seeking suspension of his conviction by the Magistrate court. In a detailed order, the sessions court held that Gandhi's disqualification would not amount to be an irreparable or an irreversible loss to him and refused interim relief to him..The now disqualified parliamentarian from Wayanad, Kerala was convicted by a magistrate court on March 23 for his controversial remark "All thieves have Modi surname." Gandhi had, in a political campaign in 2019 in Kolar, Karnataka, linked Prime Minister Narendra Modi with fugitives like Nirav Modi and Lalit Modi. He had said, "Nirav Modi, Lalit Modi, Narendra Modi. How come all the thieves have 'Modi' as a common surname?"Purnesh Modi, a former BJP Member of Legislative Assembly (MLA), took exception to the said speech claiming that Gandhi humiliated and defamed persons with the Modi surname. The magistrate court in Surat accepted the contention of Modi that by his speech, Gandhi has intentionally insulted the people with a 'Modi' surname. In his 168-page judgment, Judge Hadirash Varma said that since Gandhi is a Member of Parliament (MP), whatever he says will have a greater impact. Thus, he should have exercised restraint."The accused had taken the reference of the surname of the current Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi, to satisfy his political greed and insulted and defamed 13 crore people living in the whole of India having the surname 'Modi'" the judge held. The sessions judge refused to stay the same leading to the present plea before the High Court..[Read Order]
Gujarat High Court judge Justice Gita Gopi Wednesday recused from hearing the appeal filed by Congress leader Rahul Gandhi seeking stay on his conviction by a Magistrate court in a criminal defamation case against him [Rahul Gandhi vs Purnesh Modi]..Gandhi's appeal was mentioned before single-judge Justice Gopi. She however, said "not before me" and asked the advocate to approach the acting Chief Justice of the High Court, who can assign another bench for hearing the appeal..A sessions court in Surat had, on April 20, dismissed his plea seeking suspension of his conviction by the Magistrate court. In a detailed order, the sessions court held that Gandhi's disqualification would not amount to be an irreparable or an irreversible loss to him and refused interim relief to him..The now disqualified parliamentarian from Wayanad, Kerala was convicted by a magistrate court on March 23 for his controversial remark "All thieves have Modi surname." Gandhi had, in a political campaign in 2019 in Kolar, Karnataka, linked Prime Minister Narendra Modi with fugitives like Nirav Modi and Lalit Modi. He had said, "Nirav Modi, Lalit Modi, Narendra Modi. How come all the thieves have 'Modi' as a common surname?"Purnesh Modi, a former BJP Member of Legislative Assembly (MLA), took exception to the said speech claiming that Gandhi humiliated and defamed persons with the Modi surname. The magistrate court in Surat accepted the contention of Modi that by his speech, Gandhi has intentionally insulted the people with a 'Modi' surname. In his 168-page judgment, Judge Hadirash Varma said that since Gandhi is a Member of Parliament (MP), whatever he says will have a greater impact. Thus, he should have exercised restraint."The accused had taken the reference of the surname of the current Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi, to satisfy his political greed and insulted and defamed 13 crore people living in the whole of India having the surname 'Modi'" the judge held. The sessions judge refused to stay the same leading to the present plea before the High Court..[Read Order]