Limit BCI's powers to regulate legal education, introduce apprenticeship system for law students: Parliamentary Committee

The Parliamentary Standing Committee on Personnel, Public Grievances, Law and Justice chaired by Sushil Kumar Modi has submitted a report on Strengthening legal education in view of emerging challenges before the legal profession..The Committee has suggested that the powers of the Bar Council of India (BCI) be curbed when it comes to the regulation of legal education. It has also suggested the introduction of an apprenticeship system for undergraduate law students. While acknowledging that the BCI is empowered to regulate the filed, the report states,"...the BCI has also faced criticism and challenges in its role as the regulator of legal education. Some of the issues that have been raised are the lack of uniformity and quality in legal education across the country, the inadequacy and inefficiency of the inspection and recognition process, the resistance and noncooperation from some of the state bar councils and universities, the controversy and litigation over the validity and necessity of the AIBE, and the lack of innovation and reform in the curriculum and pedagogy of legal education.".Setting up of NCLER.Notably, the report suggests that the BCI's regulatory authority should be restricted to setting basic eligibility criteria for practicing law, rather than overseeing the entire spectrum of legal education."...there is no sense in the BCI having regulatory powers over the entire spectrum of legal education. Further, the BCI has neither power not expertise to meet the challenges of the ever changing globalized world," the report states, noting that the experts that were consulted unanimously shared this view.Accordingly, the Committee has advocated for the establishment of an independent authority called the National Council for Legal Education and Research (NCLER) to regulate higher education in law beyond practicing at the Bar..Recognition of new law colleges.The Committee has also taken the view that while granting recognition to new law colleges, the BCI should give due consideration to quality over quantity.Further, it has urged BCI to oversee the implementation of reservations in law colleges including National Law Universities (NLUs) and consider withdrawing their recognition for non-adherence..Uniform curriculum across law schools.Recognizing the disparities in legal education across various institutions, the Committee has called for a uniform curriculum to be laid down by the BCI for undergraduate courses in all law colleges and universities. "It should enable learners to be ethical, rational, compassionate and prepare them for a gainful and fulfilling employment. There has to be innovative approaches towards curriculum development and course structuring that will provide a sharper and specialized focus towards training and capacity building for the future juridical officers," the report states.Additionally, it has recommended an independent authority for defining the curriculum for postgraduate and advanced legal studies..Annual two-month apprenticeship for law students.The Committee has also recommended that undergraduate law students undergo a mandatory two-month apprenticeship each academic year to gain practical experience before enrolling as advocates.It has also recommended that law students who undergo internships with seniors should be paid stipends to encourage them and also to take care of their logistical expenses during such internship.s.Funding of law universities.The Committee has urged law universities to come up a strategic and comprehensive approach to financing infrastructure needs. To this end, universities may garner funds through government funding, public-private partnerships, alumni contributions, corporate sponsorships, philanthropic foundations and grants, etc.On using student fees to fund infrastructure, the report states,"Law universities can allocate a portion of student fees and tuition towards infrastructure development and maintenance. It is important to strike a balance between affordable education and ensuring adequate resources for infrastructure. Clear communication with students about the utilization of their fees for infrastructure improvements can help generate support for such initiatives.".Other changes recommended by the Committee include a re-look at the rule of National Assessment and Accreditation Council (NAAC) of levying ₹6 lakh as assessment fee on legal education institutions, promoting research initiatives at law schools, ensuring law graduates are well-versed in emerging technologies such as Artificial Intelligence (AI) and blockchain, providing government funding and grants to law schools actively promoting technology integration, and encouraging student and faculty exchange programs to enhance global perspectives and collaboration within the legal education community..[Read Report]