The Supreme Court on Tuesday pulled up its Registry for failing to list a matter which the Court had directed to be listed on a specific day [Sukhraj Labh Singh v. Zainab Rafiullah Sheikh and Others]..After being informed that a special leave petition (SLP) ordered by the Court to be listed on Tuesday was not listed, a Bench of Justices Abhay Oka and Augustine George Masih said,"Notwithstanding specific order dated 12th August, 2024, the Registry has not listed SLP (C) Diary No.25687/2024 today. When there is a specific order of the Court that a particular petition shall be listed, the minimum we expect from the Registry is that there is some explanation placed on record why order of this Court is not complied with," the Court ordered..The Court asked the Registrar (Judicial Listing) to take note of this default while posting the matter for hearing on September 6..The case before the Court pertains to a land dispute in respect of an office/commercial premises situated in the Fort area of Mumbai. The Bombay High Court had dismissed appeals against the trial court verdict.Aggrieved, the present appellant, whose husband was the appellant in the appeals before the High Court, has moved the top court..Advocates Siddhant Buxy, Umesh Tawari and Shambhavi Padhye appeared for the appellant..[Read Order]
The Supreme Court on Tuesday pulled up its Registry for failing to list a matter which the Court had directed to be listed on a specific day [Sukhraj Labh Singh v. Zainab Rafiullah Sheikh and Others]..After being informed that a special leave petition (SLP) ordered by the Court to be listed on Tuesday was not listed, a Bench of Justices Abhay Oka and Augustine George Masih said,"Notwithstanding specific order dated 12th August, 2024, the Registry has not listed SLP (C) Diary No.25687/2024 today. When there is a specific order of the Court that a particular petition shall be listed, the minimum we expect from the Registry is that there is some explanation placed on record why order of this Court is not complied with," the Court ordered..The Court asked the Registrar (Judicial Listing) to take note of this default while posting the matter for hearing on September 6..The case before the Court pertains to a land dispute in respect of an office/commercial premises situated in the Fort area of Mumbai. The Bombay High Court had dismissed appeals against the trial court verdict.Aggrieved, the present appellant, whose husband was the appellant in the appeals before the High Court, has moved the top court..Advocates Siddhant Buxy, Umesh Tawari and Shambhavi Padhye appeared for the appellant..[Read Order]