The Allahabad High Court heard arguments on the petition challenging the Common Law Admission Test, 2012. The Court has now granted the Respondent two days to submit a reply to the petition. Matter posted for Thursday, 28 May 2012..The Allahabad High Court heard arguments on the petition challenging the Common Law Admission Test, 2012. The Court has now granted the Respondent two days to submit a reply to the petition. Matter posted for Thursday, 28 May 2012..Speaking to Bar & Bench, Rohit Tripathi, the counsel for the Petitioner, stated that the Court did not examine the recent decision of the Delhi High Court. Tripathi also stated that when the Respondent sought more time to file a reply, the Court was inclined to grant a stay on the admission procedure. Eventually, though, the Court placed the matter for further hearing on May 31, 2012..As reported earlier by Bar & Bench, Tanaya Thakur had filed a petition before the Allahabad High Court, challenging the contents of CLAT, 2012 and alleging that some of the questions were out of the pre-defined syllabus.
The Allahabad High Court heard arguments on the petition challenging the Common Law Admission Test, 2012. The Court has now granted the Respondent two days to submit a reply to the petition. Matter posted for Thursday, 28 May 2012..The Allahabad High Court heard arguments on the petition challenging the Common Law Admission Test, 2012. The Court has now granted the Respondent two days to submit a reply to the petition. Matter posted for Thursday, 28 May 2012..Speaking to Bar & Bench, Rohit Tripathi, the counsel for the Petitioner, stated that the Court did not examine the recent decision of the Delhi High Court. Tripathi also stated that when the Respondent sought more time to file a reply, the Court was inclined to grant a stay on the admission procedure. Eventually, though, the Court placed the matter for further hearing on May 31, 2012..As reported earlier by Bar & Bench, Tanaya Thakur had filed a petition before the Allahabad High Court, challenging the contents of CLAT, 2012 and alleging that some of the questions were out of the pre-defined syllabus.