The hearing in the Ayodhya case is progressing at the Supreme Court of India..The Ayodhya case is being heard by a Constitution Bench of Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi and Justices SA Bobde, DY Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan and Abdul Nazeer..Hearings had commenced on August 6, with arguments being made on behalf of the Nirmohi Akhara. In the following hearings, submissions were also made on behalf of the deity Ram Lalla and the Ram Janmabhoomi Punaruddhar Samiti..The first round of arguments on behalf of the Muslim parties to the Ayodhya dispute have concluded, and rejoinder arguments on behalf of the Hindu parties had also commenced. Today Senior Advocate Rajeev Dhavan will be replying to the rejoinder arguments made on behalf of the Hindu parties..Below are live updates from today’s hearing in the Ayodhya case:.Rajeev Dhavan now replying to the rejoinder arguments.A mosque is where one prays to Allah, Rajeev Dhavan; Is a mosque divine? SA Bobde J; It is always divine, Dhavan; Is it dedicated to Allah? Bobde J.Answer is simple. Why do you go to Mosque? It is to pray to Allah, Rajeev Dhavan.Is Your Lordships taking a view on illegality or ignoring it altogether? I would say what was communally devisive was Dec 6, 1992 They say invasion and destruction by Muslims was communal. Then what about destruction of 1992, Dhavan.They say it is wrong to point out their communal divisivness. They Hindu parties are nothing but story tellers. Some say Babur, some Aurangzeb. Some say mosque was there, some say no, Dhavan.Who were they worshipping between 1855 and 1989? Every sacral area does not become a juristic personality, Dhavan.I am replying to legal propositions which Parasaran has made in his rejoinder arguments, Dhavan.Their reliance on Kiran Bedi’s case is not even obiter, Dhavan.Vaidyanathan says highest court should not be used for drama; Dhavan says they are pointing fingers at his style of argument. “I am making some legal propositions”, Dhavan.Dhavan reading out submissions of one of the Hindu parties. “It says Constitution is voidable ab initio and UP Waqf Act was an atrocity by British”, Dhavan says. You attack my mosque destroy it and then call me harasser, Dhavan.This dispute would have been settled but for one insistence; that Lord Ram was born under the inner central dome. That is why Muslims have said prove it, Dhavan. That is the core of this case, Dhavan.Bench rises for lunch..Post Lunch Updates.Rajeev Dhavan making submissions on grant for maintenance of mosque by Babur and subsequently by British.In giving grant for upkeep of the mosque, they recognise the mosque, Rajeev Dhavan.Our pleadings are very simple. We dont know what happened before 1855 except accounts by travellers, Rajeev Dhavan..Read an account of Day 1 of the arguments in the Ayodhya case here. Accounts of the arguments made on Days 2 and 3 can be read here and here. Arguments made on Day 5 can be read here..Day 6 arguments can be read here and Day 7 arguments can be read here. Day 8 arguments can be read here. Day 9 arguments can be read here. Day 10 arguments can be read here..An account of day 15 arguments can be read here and an account of day 16 arguments can be read here. An account of Day 17 arguments can be read here. An account of Day 21 arguments can be read here. An account of Day 22 arguments may be read here. Day 24 arguments can be read here. Day 25 arguments may be read here. An account of the arguments that took place on Days 26 and 27 may be read here. Read an account of Day 29 here. .An account of Day 30 can be read here. and and account of Day 31 may be read here. An account of Day 32 arguments can be read here. An account of Day 33 arguments can be read here. An account of Day 34 arguments can be read here. An account of Day 35 arguments can be read here. An account of Day 36 arguments can be read here.Bar & Bench is available on WhatsApp. For real-time updates on stories, Click here to subscribe to our WhatsApp.
The hearing in the Ayodhya case is progressing at the Supreme Court of India..The Ayodhya case is being heard by a Constitution Bench of Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi and Justices SA Bobde, DY Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan and Abdul Nazeer..Hearings had commenced on August 6, with arguments being made on behalf of the Nirmohi Akhara. In the following hearings, submissions were also made on behalf of the deity Ram Lalla and the Ram Janmabhoomi Punaruddhar Samiti..The first round of arguments on behalf of the Muslim parties to the Ayodhya dispute have concluded, and rejoinder arguments on behalf of the Hindu parties had also commenced. Today Senior Advocate Rajeev Dhavan will be replying to the rejoinder arguments made on behalf of the Hindu parties..Below are live updates from today’s hearing in the Ayodhya case:.Rajeev Dhavan now replying to the rejoinder arguments.A mosque is where one prays to Allah, Rajeev Dhavan; Is a mosque divine? SA Bobde J; It is always divine, Dhavan; Is it dedicated to Allah? Bobde J.Answer is simple. Why do you go to Mosque? It is to pray to Allah, Rajeev Dhavan.Is Your Lordships taking a view on illegality or ignoring it altogether? I would say what was communally devisive was Dec 6, 1992 They say invasion and destruction by Muslims was communal. Then what about destruction of 1992, Dhavan.They say it is wrong to point out their communal divisivness. They Hindu parties are nothing but story tellers. Some say Babur, some Aurangzeb. Some say mosque was there, some say no, Dhavan.Who were they worshipping between 1855 and 1989? Every sacral area does not become a juristic personality, Dhavan.I am replying to legal propositions which Parasaran has made in his rejoinder arguments, Dhavan.Their reliance on Kiran Bedi’s case is not even obiter, Dhavan.Vaidyanathan says highest court should not be used for drama; Dhavan says they are pointing fingers at his style of argument. “I am making some legal propositions”, Dhavan.Dhavan reading out submissions of one of the Hindu parties. “It says Constitution is voidable ab initio and UP Waqf Act was an atrocity by British”, Dhavan says. You attack my mosque destroy it and then call me harasser, Dhavan.This dispute would have been settled but for one insistence; that Lord Ram was born under the inner central dome. That is why Muslims have said prove it, Dhavan. That is the core of this case, Dhavan.Bench rises for lunch..Post Lunch Updates.Rajeev Dhavan making submissions on grant for maintenance of mosque by Babur and subsequently by British.In giving grant for upkeep of the mosque, they recognise the mosque, Rajeev Dhavan.Our pleadings are very simple. We dont know what happened before 1855 except accounts by travellers, Rajeev Dhavan..Read an account of Day 1 of the arguments in the Ayodhya case here. Accounts of the arguments made on Days 2 and 3 can be read here and here. Arguments made on Day 5 can be read here..Day 6 arguments can be read here and Day 7 arguments can be read here. Day 8 arguments can be read here. Day 9 arguments can be read here. Day 10 arguments can be read here..An account of day 15 arguments can be read here and an account of day 16 arguments can be read here. An account of Day 17 arguments can be read here. An account of Day 21 arguments can be read here. An account of Day 22 arguments may be read here. Day 24 arguments can be read here. Day 25 arguments may be read here. An account of the arguments that took place on Days 26 and 27 may be read here. Read an account of Day 29 here. .An account of Day 30 can be read here. and and account of Day 31 may be read here. An account of Day 32 arguments can be read here. An account of Day 33 arguments can be read here. An account of Day 34 arguments can be read here. An account of Day 35 arguments can be read here. An account of Day 36 arguments can be read here.Bar & Bench is available on WhatsApp. For real-time updates on stories, Click here to subscribe to our WhatsApp.
![Ayodhya Hearing: Live Updates from Supreme Court [Day 37]](http://media.assettype.com/barandbench%2Fimport%2F2019%2F08%2FAyodhya-dispute-4-1.jpg?w=480&auto=format%2Ccompress&fit=max)
