Supreme Court, Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019 
News

Supreme Court refuses to entertain plea against LG's power to nominate 5 MLAs to J&K Assembly

A Bench of Justices Sanjiv Khanna and PV Sanjay Kumar asked the petitioner to first approach the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh.

Abhimanyu Hazarika

The Supreme Court on Monday refused to entertain a plea challenging the power vested on the Lieutenant Governor (LG) of Jammu and Kashmir to nominate 5 Members of Legislative Assembly (MLAs) to the the Jammu and Kashmir Assembly. (Ravinder Kumar Sharma v Lieutenant Governor Jammu & Kashmir and ors)

A Bench of Justices Sanjiv Khanna and PV Sanjay Kumar said it was not inclined to entertain the matter and asked the petitioner to first approach the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh.

"In many cases where we have entertained at first instance (bypassing High Court), we see many things get left out," the Court remarked.

This was after Senior Advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi appearing for petitioner Ravinder Kumar Sharma (a Congress leader) said that such nomination by unelected LG can throttle the electoral verdict.

Justice Sanjiv Khanna and Justice PV Sanjay Kumar

The J&K assembly has 90 elected members. The Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act of 2019 envisages nomination of 5 more MLAs by the LG to represent the displaced Kashmiri people and those from Pak Occupied Kashmir.

This raises the majority mark in the assembly from 45 to 48.

In the recently concluded assembly elections, the INDIA coalition of J&K National Conference, Indian National Congress and the Communist Party of India (Marxist) secured 49 seats in the assembly putting them above the majority mark of 48 even in case of nomination of 5 members.

Supreme Court upholds 25% domicile reservation at National Law University, Jodhpur

The moment I see an arbitration presided by a retired judge, I lose faith: Harish Salve

Trapped no more: A legislative fix for registered owners’ liability

Bring me back to the Bench: Justice Rohinton Nariman's witty response when asked about frivolous cases for social media posts

P&H High Court orders removal of accused's name from court records after exoneration in Section 498A case

SCROLL FOR NEXT