A summary of important cases from the causelists of the Supreme Court of India, the Bombay High Court, and the Delhi High Court. This week we will also be tracking IP matters in the Delhi High Court involving the law firm, Anand & Anand..TABLE OF CASES.Supreme Court of India.ND Jayaprakash v. Union of India and Anr.Bamag Felix v. Pema Khandu & Ors.Assam Sanmilita Mahasangha & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.State of Haryana v. State of MaharashtraJagdish Purohit v. High Court of M.P and Ors.Hardik Bharatbhai Patel v. State of Gujarat and Anr.Rahul Gandhi v. Rajesh Mahadev Kunte and Anr.Indian Hotel & Restaurant Association & Anr. v. State Of Maharashtra & Anr.Delhi High Court.State Vs Sushil Ansal and State Vs Gopal AnsalCairn India Ltd & Ors Vs Directorate General of Foreign Trade & Ors.OBC United Front of India Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.M S Dhoni and Anr Vs Ajjay R Agarwal (Chairman and Managing Director) Maxx Mobilink Pvt Ltd.IPR MATTERS- Anand & AnandYahoo! INC. Vs Mr. Ramesh Paul Marwah & Ors The Indian Performing Right Society Ltd Vs Kapsons Fashion Pvt Ltd & Ors..Bombay High Court.Sumeer Ramdayal Sabharwal v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.Common citizens of India & Anr. v. Honble High Court Judicature BombayBig Tree Entertainment Pvt Ltd. & Anr. v. State of Maharashtra & 2 Ors..SUMMARY OF CASES.Supreme Court of India.1. ND Jayaprakash v. Union of India and Anr..[Item 1 in court 5 – Writ Petition. (CRL.) NO. 25/2016].Bench: Jasti Chelameswar, Abhay Manohar Sapre J..A PIL filed in the Supreme Court by social activist and JNU alumnus ND Jayaprakash after the violence in Patiala house court on Monday. In his petition, Jayaprakash has sought appropriate directions to be issued to the Union Home Ministry including the police to ensure the safety and security of persons inside the court premises during the trial of Kanhaiya Kumar, President of Jawaharlal Nehru University Students’ Union..Senior Advocate Indira Jaising had mentioned the matter yesterday at 2 pm and got it listed for today. Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal is likely to appear for the petitioner today..Today in court: The hearing in this case took up most of the time of this Bench today. Read the detailed report here..2. Bamag Felix v. Pema Khandu & Ors..[Item 501 in court 3 – S.L.P. (C)… /2016].Bench: Jagdish Singh Khehar, Dipak Misra, Madan B Lokur, PC Ghose, NV Ramana JJ..with.Nabam Rebia v. Deputy Speaker and Ors..[Item 501 in court 3 – SLP(C) 1259-1260/2016].Bench: Jagdish Singh Khehar, Dipak Misra, Madan B Lokur, PC Ghose, NV Ramana JJ..Case pertaining to Arunachal Pradesh political controversy. The Court yesterday rejected a plea for an order restraining the Governor from swearing in a new government in Arunachal Pradesh. The Congress leaders had made the plea in the wake of dissident Congress leader Kalikho Pul’s claim that he had enough support to become Chief Minister. Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi had come rushing to the court yesterday after he came to know that the Congress leaders are seeking interim relief..This matter will be heard today on merits..Today in court: The Court today sought for original records pertaining to the disqualification of the 14 MLAs. It ordered the following:.“The record pertaining to the proceedings conducted by the 3 Speaker – Nabam Rebia, under the Xth Schedule of the Constitution pertaining to the disqualification of the 14 MLAs, held on 14.12.2015 and 15.12.2015, be produced in this Court in a sealed cover at the earliest, preferably by 10.30 a.m. on 18.02.2016, by the Secretary of the State Legislative Assembly, in whose official custody, we are informed, the original record is available..The impugned order further reveals, that some part of the above record, is also in the safe custody of the Gauhati High Court, and has been retained in a sealed cover. The Registrar General of the Gauhati High Court is directed to ensure, that the sealed record pertaining to the disqualification of the 14 MLAs, assailed in Writ Petition(C) No. 9 of 2016, is produced in this Court at the earliest, preferably by 10.30 a.m. on 18.02.2016.”.The court has ordered maintenance of status quo. The case will now be taken up at 10.30 am tomorrow..3. Assam Sanmilita Mahasangha & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors..[Item 301 in court 7 – Writ Petition (Civil) 562/2012].Bench: Ranjan Gogoi, Rohinton Fali Nariman JJ..A case relating to illegal migration into the State of Assam. It involves many significant issues including Constitutionality of Section 6A of the Citizenship Act and whether there is a rational basis for having a separate cut-off date for regularizing illegal migrants who enter Assam as opposed to the rest of the country issue. The Court is also considering whether an influx of illegal migrants into a State of India constitute “external aggression” and/or “internal disturbance”?.When the matter was last heard, the Court reiterated that the preparation/upgradation of the work of National Register of Citizens (NRC) would be of top most priority and the officials and employees of the State Government engaged in the preparation of the NRC would be primarily and principally engaged with the said work. However, the court also held that without affecting primacy and priority to the upgradation work of the NRC such officers would also attend to other duties as prayed for by the State of Assam and to election duties as prayed for by the Election Commission..The Court also directed the concerned Authorities in the Finance and Home Ministries of the Government of India as also the Ministry of External Affairs to provide the requisite data base to the State Coordinator of NRC so that the process of verification o documents/ identification proofs can be carried out without any impediment..Today in court: This case could not be tracked. Any update/ information would be appreciated..4. State of Haryana v. State of Maharashtra.[Item 1 in court 9 – SLP (Crl.)… /2016].Bench: V Gopala Gowda, Arun Mishra JJ..Check evening updates..Today in court: This case could not be tracked. Any update/ information would be appreciated..5. Jagdish Purohit v. High Court of M.P and Ors..[Item 6 in court 1 – SLP(Civil)… /2016].Bench: Chief Justice TS Thakur, FMI Kalifulla, AK Sikri, SA Bobde, R Banumathi JJ. .Check evening updates..Today in court: This case could not be tracked. Any update/ information would be appreciated..6. Hardik Bharatbhai Patel v. State of Gujarat and Anr.[Item 1 in court 3 – SLP (Crl.) 9429/2015].Bench: Jagdish Singh Khehar, Madan B Lokur, PC Ghose JJ..A petition by Hardik Patel seeking the quashing of the sedition case lodged against him by the Surat police. On 27th October, the Gujarat High Court had rejected his plea following which Patel had appealed to the Supreme Court. When the matter was last heard, Court had asked Gujarat government to provide an English translation of the chargesheet to Hardik Patel by January 27..This case will be heard if the Constitution Bench hearing the Arunachal matter does not sit for any reason..Today in court: This Bench did not sit today..7. Rahul Gandhi v. Rajesh Mahadev Kunte and Anr..[Item 4 in court 4 – SLP (Crl.) 3749/2015].Bench: Dipak Misra, NV Ramana JJ..Petition filed by Congress Vice President Rahul Gandhi seeking quash of defamation proceedings pending against him in a Maharashtra court based on a complaint filed by RSS activist Rajesh Kunte..Kunte had approached the courts following Gandhi’s remark that the RSS was involved in Mahatma Gandhi’s assassination. Gandhi’ plea to quash the complaint was rejected by the Bombay High Court whereupon he had approached the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court had stayed the trial proceedings until Gandhi’s appeal was disposed..This case will be heard, only if the Constitution Bench in court 3 does not sit for any reason. .Today in court: This Bench did not sit today..8. Indian Hotel & Restaurant Association & Anr. v. State Of Maharashtra & Anr..[Item 5 in court 4 – Writ Petition (Civil) 793/2014].Bench: Dipak Misra, NV Ramana JJ..A petition challenging the Constitutional validity of certain provisions in Maharashtra Police (Second Amendment) Act which bans dance performances at bars and hotels in Maharashtra. At the last hearing, Senior Advocate Harish Salve had appeared for the Maharashtra government and sought time to file affidavit. The Court granted the same and listed the case for February 16..Read the full report here..This case will be taken up, if the Constitution bench in court 3 does not sit for any reason..Today in court: This Bench did not sit today..Delhi High Court.1. State Vs Sushil Ansal and State Vs Gopal Ansal.[Item 31 & 32, Court 36- TR.P.(CRL.) 57/2015].Bench- Siddharth Mridul J..A petition filed by the Delhi Police seeking transfer of a case pertaining to alleged destruction of evidence in the 1997 Uphaar fire tragedy, which is pending in the court of an additional sessions judge in the Patiala House courts complex, to another competent court..Today in Court- The parties advanced arguments on the remedy of a possible second Revision before the High Court under Section 401 of the CrPC. The case was adjourned to be heard next week..2. Cairn India Ltd & Ors Vs Directorate General of Foreign Trade & Ors..[Item 28, Court 10- W.P.(C) 11600/2015].Bench- Manmohan J..Petition seeking permission to export surplus crude oil from Barmer oil field in Rajasthan. The company had argued that due to the delay in requisite permissions from the Government, it was incurring heavy losses by selling crude to domestic players..On the last date of hearing, ASG Tushar Mehta submitted that Product Sharing Contract (PSC) conditions did not allow Cairn to export oil. The Centre agreed to file recommendations made by the Committee looking into the issue, before the next date of hearing..Today in Court- This case was deleted from the list..3. OBC United Front of India Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr..[Item 29, Court 9- WP(C) 11791/2015].Bench- Manmohan J..Petition filed seeking the quashing of a notification issued by the Delhi Govt that had included the Jat community under backward class list. On the last date of hearing, the Bench had issued notice to the Delhi Government..Today in Court- The Delhi Govt submitted in Court that it had formulated a response to the issue and sought more time to place its reply on record. The Bench, however directed the Govt to expedite its response and make its stance clear for the Supreme Court had already laid down the law in this regard. There were also other lawyers in Court who sought permission from the Bench to be impleaded as parties in the case so as to argue in favor of/against the notification..The Bench granted time to all interested parties to file their vakalathnamas and also for the Delhi Govt to file its reply. The matter was adjourned to September 15..4. M S Dhoni and Anr Vs Ajjay R Agarwal (Chairman and Managing Director) Maxx Mobilink Pvt Ltd..[Item 13, Court 13- CONT.CAS(C) 317/2015].Bench- JR Midha J..A contempt petition filed by cricketer MS Dhoni alleging violation of court’s order of January 22 restraining Maxx Mobilink from selling products containing an endorsement by Dhoni..Today in Court- This Bench did not assemble today..IPR MATTERS- Anand & Anand5. Yahoo! INC. Vs Mr. Ramesh Paul Marwah & Ors [Item 21, Court 24-CS(OS) 1212/2015].Bench- Vipin Sanghi J..Check evening updates.Today in Court- This case was not taken up..6. The Indian Performing Right Society Ltd Vs Kapsons Fashion Pvt Ltd & Ors. [Item 11, Court 22- CS(OS) 2650/2010].Bench- Valmiki Mehta J..Check evening updates..Today in Court- The Plaintiff’s counsels informed the Court that a similar case was pending before the Supreme Court and sought for an adjournment. The Bench accordingly adjourned the matter to July 15..Bombay High Court.1. Sumeer Ramdayal Sabharwal v. State of Maharashtra & Ors..[Item 901 Court 43 – CRPIL(Cri)/43/2015].Bench: V.M Kanade, Revati Mohite Dere JJ..A PIL filed by hotel owners against a police raid conducted in the Malwani region. The police have said they acted upon the complaints of residents in the area regarding a prostitution racket. The state had been asked to provide the grounds for arresting guests staying in the hotel..Today in court: Shilpi Jain counsel for petitioners stated that moral policing is not sanctioned under law, police must function in accordance with the law..S.K. Shinde, public prosecutor for state had earlier submitted that the raids conducted were a form of preventive action..“We feel the privacy of individuals was violated due to these arrests and state police should be extra cautious in conducting such raids” – Kanade J said..Petitioners were asked to file a compilation of suggestions for the state. The next date of hearing is March 10..2. Common Citizen of India & Anr. v. Hon’ble High Court of Judicature Bombay.[Item 906 Court 31 – Writ Petition(Ci)/10972/2015].Bench: S.C Dharmadhikari, G.S. Patel JJ..Today in court: The matter could not be tracked..3. Big Tree Entertainment Pvt Ltd. & Anr v. State of Maharashtra & 2 Ors..[Item 10 Court 31 – Writ Petition(O)/1755/2013].Bench: S.C Dharmadhikari, G.S. Patel JJ..The petitioners challenge a government resolution of 2013 which bars them from levying any additional charge on tickets purchased online..Today in court: The daily board was suspended before the matter came up.
A summary of important cases from the causelists of the Supreme Court of India, the Bombay High Court, and the Delhi High Court. This week we will also be tracking IP matters in the Delhi High Court involving the law firm, Anand & Anand..TABLE OF CASES.Supreme Court of India.ND Jayaprakash v. Union of India and Anr.Bamag Felix v. Pema Khandu & Ors.Assam Sanmilita Mahasangha & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.State of Haryana v. State of MaharashtraJagdish Purohit v. High Court of M.P and Ors.Hardik Bharatbhai Patel v. State of Gujarat and Anr.Rahul Gandhi v. Rajesh Mahadev Kunte and Anr.Indian Hotel & Restaurant Association & Anr. v. State Of Maharashtra & Anr.Delhi High Court.State Vs Sushil Ansal and State Vs Gopal AnsalCairn India Ltd & Ors Vs Directorate General of Foreign Trade & Ors.OBC United Front of India Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.M S Dhoni and Anr Vs Ajjay R Agarwal (Chairman and Managing Director) Maxx Mobilink Pvt Ltd.IPR MATTERS- Anand & AnandYahoo! INC. Vs Mr. Ramesh Paul Marwah & Ors The Indian Performing Right Society Ltd Vs Kapsons Fashion Pvt Ltd & Ors..Bombay High Court.Sumeer Ramdayal Sabharwal v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.Common citizens of India & Anr. v. Honble High Court Judicature BombayBig Tree Entertainment Pvt Ltd. & Anr. v. State of Maharashtra & 2 Ors..SUMMARY OF CASES.Supreme Court of India.1. ND Jayaprakash v. Union of India and Anr..[Item 1 in court 5 – Writ Petition. (CRL.) NO. 25/2016].Bench: Jasti Chelameswar, Abhay Manohar Sapre J..A PIL filed in the Supreme Court by social activist and JNU alumnus ND Jayaprakash after the violence in Patiala house court on Monday. In his petition, Jayaprakash has sought appropriate directions to be issued to the Union Home Ministry including the police to ensure the safety and security of persons inside the court premises during the trial of Kanhaiya Kumar, President of Jawaharlal Nehru University Students’ Union..Senior Advocate Indira Jaising had mentioned the matter yesterday at 2 pm and got it listed for today. Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal is likely to appear for the petitioner today..Today in court: The hearing in this case took up most of the time of this Bench today. Read the detailed report here..2. Bamag Felix v. Pema Khandu & Ors..[Item 501 in court 3 – S.L.P. (C)… /2016].Bench: Jagdish Singh Khehar, Dipak Misra, Madan B Lokur, PC Ghose, NV Ramana JJ..with.Nabam Rebia v. Deputy Speaker and Ors..[Item 501 in court 3 – SLP(C) 1259-1260/2016].Bench: Jagdish Singh Khehar, Dipak Misra, Madan B Lokur, PC Ghose, NV Ramana JJ..Case pertaining to Arunachal Pradesh political controversy. The Court yesterday rejected a plea for an order restraining the Governor from swearing in a new government in Arunachal Pradesh. The Congress leaders had made the plea in the wake of dissident Congress leader Kalikho Pul’s claim that he had enough support to become Chief Minister. Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi had come rushing to the court yesterday after he came to know that the Congress leaders are seeking interim relief..This matter will be heard today on merits..Today in court: The Court today sought for original records pertaining to the disqualification of the 14 MLAs. It ordered the following:.“The record pertaining to the proceedings conducted by the 3 Speaker – Nabam Rebia, under the Xth Schedule of the Constitution pertaining to the disqualification of the 14 MLAs, held on 14.12.2015 and 15.12.2015, be produced in this Court in a sealed cover at the earliest, preferably by 10.30 a.m. on 18.02.2016, by the Secretary of the State Legislative Assembly, in whose official custody, we are informed, the original record is available..The impugned order further reveals, that some part of the above record, is also in the safe custody of the Gauhati High Court, and has been retained in a sealed cover. The Registrar General of the Gauhati High Court is directed to ensure, that the sealed record pertaining to the disqualification of the 14 MLAs, assailed in Writ Petition(C) No. 9 of 2016, is produced in this Court at the earliest, preferably by 10.30 a.m. on 18.02.2016.”.The court has ordered maintenance of status quo. The case will now be taken up at 10.30 am tomorrow..3. Assam Sanmilita Mahasangha & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors..[Item 301 in court 7 – Writ Petition (Civil) 562/2012].Bench: Ranjan Gogoi, Rohinton Fali Nariman JJ..A case relating to illegal migration into the State of Assam. It involves many significant issues including Constitutionality of Section 6A of the Citizenship Act and whether there is a rational basis for having a separate cut-off date for regularizing illegal migrants who enter Assam as opposed to the rest of the country issue. The Court is also considering whether an influx of illegal migrants into a State of India constitute “external aggression” and/or “internal disturbance”?.When the matter was last heard, the Court reiterated that the preparation/upgradation of the work of National Register of Citizens (NRC) would be of top most priority and the officials and employees of the State Government engaged in the preparation of the NRC would be primarily and principally engaged with the said work. However, the court also held that without affecting primacy and priority to the upgradation work of the NRC such officers would also attend to other duties as prayed for by the State of Assam and to election duties as prayed for by the Election Commission..The Court also directed the concerned Authorities in the Finance and Home Ministries of the Government of India as also the Ministry of External Affairs to provide the requisite data base to the State Coordinator of NRC so that the process of verification o documents/ identification proofs can be carried out without any impediment..Today in court: This case could not be tracked. Any update/ information would be appreciated..4. State of Haryana v. State of Maharashtra.[Item 1 in court 9 – SLP (Crl.)… /2016].Bench: V Gopala Gowda, Arun Mishra JJ..Check evening updates..Today in court: This case could not be tracked. Any update/ information would be appreciated..5. Jagdish Purohit v. High Court of M.P and Ors..[Item 6 in court 1 – SLP(Civil)… /2016].Bench: Chief Justice TS Thakur, FMI Kalifulla, AK Sikri, SA Bobde, R Banumathi JJ. .Check evening updates..Today in court: This case could not be tracked. Any update/ information would be appreciated..6. Hardik Bharatbhai Patel v. State of Gujarat and Anr.[Item 1 in court 3 – SLP (Crl.) 9429/2015].Bench: Jagdish Singh Khehar, Madan B Lokur, PC Ghose JJ..A petition by Hardik Patel seeking the quashing of the sedition case lodged against him by the Surat police. On 27th October, the Gujarat High Court had rejected his plea following which Patel had appealed to the Supreme Court. When the matter was last heard, Court had asked Gujarat government to provide an English translation of the chargesheet to Hardik Patel by January 27..This case will be heard if the Constitution Bench hearing the Arunachal matter does not sit for any reason..Today in court: This Bench did not sit today..7. Rahul Gandhi v. Rajesh Mahadev Kunte and Anr..[Item 4 in court 4 – SLP (Crl.) 3749/2015].Bench: Dipak Misra, NV Ramana JJ..Petition filed by Congress Vice President Rahul Gandhi seeking quash of defamation proceedings pending against him in a Maharashtra court based on a complaint filed by RSS activist Rajesh Kunte..Kunte had approached the courts following Gandhi’s remark that the RSS was involved in Mahatma Gandhi’s assassination. Gandhi’ plea to quash the complaint was rejected by the Bombay High Court whereupon he had approached the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court had stayed the trial proceedings until Gandhi’s appeal was disposed..This case will be heard, only if the Constitution Bench in court 3 does not sit for any reason. .Today in court: This Bench did not sit today..8. Indian Hotel & Restaurant Association & Anr. v. State Of Maharashtra & Anr..[Item 5 in court 4 – Writ Petition (Civil) 793/2014].Bench: Dipak Misra, NV Ramana JJ..A petition challenging the Constitutional validity of certain provisions in Maharashtra Police (Second Amendment) Act which bans dance performances at bars and hotels in Maharashtra. At the last hearing, Senior Advocate Harish Salve had appeared for the Maharashtra government and sought time to file affidavit. The Court granted the same and listed the case for February 16..Read the full report here..This case will be taken up, if the Constitution bench in court 3 does not sit for any reason..Today in court: This Bench did not sit today..Delhi High Court.1. State Vs Sushil Ansal and State Vs Gopal Ansal.[Item 31 & 32, Court 36- TR.P.(CRL.) 57/2015].Bench- Siddharth Mridul J..A petition filed by the Delhi Police seeking transfer of a case pertaining to alleged destruction of evidence in the 1997 Uphaar fire tragedy, which is pending in the court of an additional sessions judge in the Patiala House courts complex, to another competent court..Today in Court- The parties advanced arguments on the remedy of a possible second Revision before the High Court under Section 401 of the CrPC. The case was adjourned to be heard next week..2. Cairn India Ltd & Ors Vs Directorate General of Foreign Trade & Ors..[Item 28, Court 10- W.P.(C) 11600/2015].Bench- Manmohan J..Petition seeking permission to export surplus crude oil from Barmer oil field in Rajasthan. The company had argued that due to the delay in requisite permissions from the Government, it was incurring heavy losses by selling crude to domestic players..On the last date of hearing, ASG Tushar Mehta submitted that Product Sharing Contract (PSC) conditions did not allow Cairn to export oil. The Centre agreed to file recommendations made by the Committee looking into the issue, before the next date of hearing..Today in Court- This case was deleted from the list..3. OBC United Front of India Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr..[Item 29, Court 9- WP(C) 11791/2015].Bench- Manmohan J..Petition filed seeking the quashing of a notification issued by the Delhi Govt that had included the Jat community under backward class list. On the last date of hearing, the Bench had issued notice to the Delhi Government..Today in Court- The Delhi Govt submitted in Court that it had formulated a response to the issue and sought more time to place its reply on record. The Bench, however directed the Govt to expedite its response and make its stance clear for the Supreme Court had already laid down the law in this regard. There were also other lawyers in Court who sought permission from the Bench to be impleaded as parties in the case so as to argue in favor of/against the notification..The Bench granted time to all interested parties to file their vakalathnamas and also for the Delhi Govt to file its reply. The matter was adjourned to September 15..4. M S Dhoni and Anr Vs Ajjay R Agarwal (Chairman and Managing Director) Maxx Mobilink Pvt Ltd..[Item 13, Court 13- CONT.CAS(C) 317/2015].Bench- JR Midha J..A contempt petition filed by cricketer MS Dhoni alleging violation of court’s order of January 22 restraining Maxx Mobilink from selling products containing an endorsement by Dhoni..Today in Court- This Bench did not assemble today..IPR MATTERS- Anand & Anand5. Yahoo! INC. Vs Mr. Ramesh Paul Marwah & Ors [Item 21, Court 24-CS(OS) 1212/2015].Bench- Vipin Sanghi J..Check evening updates.Today in Court- This case was not taken up..6. The Indian Performing Right Society Ltd Vs Kapsons Fashion Pvt Ltd & Ors. [Item 11, Court 22- CS(OS) 2650/2010].Bench- Valmiki Mehta J..Check evening updates..Today in Court- The Plaintiff’s counsels informed the Court that a similar case was pending before the Supreme Court and sought for an adjournment. The Bench accordingly adjourned the matter to July 15..Bombay High Court.1. Sumeer Ramdayal Sabharwal v. State of Maharashtra & Ors..[Item 901 Court 43 – CRPIL(Cri)/43/2015].Bench: V.M Kanade, Revati Mohite Dere JJ..A PIL filed by hotel owners against a police raid conducted in the Malwani region. The police have said they acted upon the complaints of residents in the area regarding a prostitution racket. The state had been asked to provide the grounds for arresting guests staying in the hotel..Today in court: Shilpi Jain counsel for petitioners stated that moral policing is not sanctioned under law, police must function in accordance with the law..S.K. Shinde, public prosecutor for state had earlier submitted that the raids conducted were a form of preventive action..“We feel the privacy of individuals was violated due to these arrests and state police should be extra cautious in conducting such raids” – Kanade J said..Petitioners were asked to file a compilation of suggestions for the state. The next date of hearing is March 10..2. Common Citizen of India & Anr. v. Hon’ble High Court of Judicature Bombay.[Item 906 Court 31 – Writ Petition(Ci)/10972/2015].Bench: S.C Dharmadhikari, G.S. Patel JJ..Today in court: The matter could not be tracked..3. Big Tree Entertainment Pvt Ltd. & Anr v. State of Maharashtra & 2 Ors..[Item 10 Court 31 – Writ Petition(O)/1755/2013].Bench: S.C Dharmadhikari, G.S. Patel JJ..The petitioners challenge a government resolution of 2013 which bars them from levying any additional charge on tickets purchased online..Today in court: The daily board was suspended before the matter came up.