Live-in relationship takes a leap Delhi High Court allows London Solicitor to walk-in and walk-out

The Delhi High Court has ruled that, “a partner in a live-in relationship can walk out of it at any point of time without any legal consequence and neither of the partners can complain of infide

(17)

jyoti

March 5, 2012 - 6:35am

palimony should be granted to the female in case of live in relationship that will reduce this trend. men enter into live in relationship so that there is no liablity but only they will enjoy. but in reality life is having good and bad things which every one has to face. he cannot leave a woman after using her sexually it affects her social life because thereafter no one will accept her not even her relatives. but being a man every wife accepts her husband again even he stayed with so many woman. it is therefore not unlawful in granting palimony to the other woman with whom a man stayed a considerable time together under one roof as husband and wife without marriage. actually granting palimony with remove abuse of woman to some extent.

(17)

Lucky

February 22, 2011 - 3:09pm

Excellent Judgement!!Live-in relationships are more of relationsips of convenience. Both the parties find some comfort in difficult and trying times. Emotional and physical needs are satisfied. The taboo related to a pre-marital sexual relationship is also questioned. As long as both of them agree to share all the responsibilities, it is absolutely fine. However, the problem arises if one of them has an immoral motive to live-in. It could be anything - cheating your wife/husband, using the other party for financial gains or social recognition, wanting to escape responsibilitis of a permanent relationship like marriage, etc. It is not correct if it is taken as a relationship of advantage without responsibilities. Youngsters who live-in should treat each other with dignity and respect. Let love be damned, respect is paramount. For the same reason, a break-up of a live-in relationship should also be treated as any other break-up. It has to be considered that such relationships can also break like other relationships. Post break-up, both the parties should not try to create troubles for each other. It is sad to see how one of them tries to take an advantage of the relationship and ruin the other person's life post break-up.The society is yet to respect live-in relationships. In this context, it becomes morally obligatory on both the parties to treat each other with respect. More so for a man, since a woman is always at the receiving end of the society whether in a live-in relationship or after break-up.Overall, the judgement is excellent and very progressive..

(17)

sunil singh

November 1, 2010 - 10:41pm

once accepting live-in-relation,withoutintent to marry and subsequently claiming right is absurd

(17)

sunil singh

November 1, 2010 - 8:48pm

once accepting live-in-relation,withoutintent to marry and subsequently claiming right is absurd

(17)

sunil singh

November 1, 2010 - 8:48pm

once accepting live-in-relation,withoutintent to marry and subsequently claiming right is absurd

FEATURES

Latest Tweets

Latest Tweets

CONNECT

Follow us on

-->