EampY-FICCI Report recognises JGLS as a Premium Higher Education Institute

now this is what we call scam.

To whomsoever it may concern...There is a reason why we are a Global law school & not National. We will be global lawyers and leaders of tomorrow.NLU-D, its a pigeon hole campus and i went to NLU-J too and saw there plight ...with pathetic sports facilities. We screwed all the teams from the so called NLUs...as a matter of fact..JGLS promises to produce gentlemen's and dudes...i as a matter of fact am a stud with the hottest girls mad about me. We like to maintain standards and which is why I dumped my girlfriend for not being in an elite institution like Jindal...Our faculty and our curriculum is impeccable...soon we'll start winning the moots also and will be on the top the table every where...We have contacts so we can intern in the best places too...has anyone from any national law school interned in White & Case

@ Mayank Suri: :) As long as there publicly is a "dude" like you with the hottest girls as the poster boy for JGLS, all issues raised here become redundant. :: Resign ::

For once I did consider JGLS as an option for my younger sister. When I spoke to the admissions officer, I was very disappointed. Though he tried his best to give me a grand picture. He kept on repeating AZB & Amarchand and their tie up with Jindal. I am an alumnus of a National Law School and for me nothing matters more than the quality of students i.e. your peer group. I learnt the most in law school because of the people around me. It's been three years since Jindal's inception and their students have failed to perform in most the moots and other student events like wise. My junior's told me the one moot they could manage to win was NLS Arb. Honestly, lets compare Jindal's growth with Naitonal Law University,Delhi. In its 3rd year...they rocked the mooting scene in India. Their students have carved a niche for themselves. In India, IITs,IIMs and National Law Schools are not known for their faculty but their students, who with their hardwork and diligence have proved their mettle

@Rohit: Once again the infamous JGLS-NLS debate has struck again.What is your perception of student quality?What are some of the essential requisites for student quality?Is student quality determined by engaging in intellectually stimulating conversations?Is that what you are tryingto say?I am a student here at Jindal and I have been exposed to a wonderful environment.I agree with the fact that NLU-D has achieved more success than Jindal especially in mooting.But if you look at law schools like Harvard,Yale,Stanford etc. their success is measured by their publications.Students focus more on publishing papers rather than mooting and debating.The Ivy League schools are more consolidated than our lawschools.They work as a unit.Talking about standards,if you do a comparative analysis between LSAT and CLAT you'll find the standards which LSATdemands are far more higher than CLAT.So you are saying that a law school's reputation is built on a students's mooting skills.I find that veryamusing and hard to believe.If NLS has a very high standard then it should be in the list of top 100 law schools in the world.Why aren't studensfrom NLS doing an LL.M in NLS after finishing their BA.LLB?Why do graduates from NLS do their LL.M in Yale,Harvard or Stanford?Yale Harvard and Columbia give equal importance to JD as well as LL.M.program.Why aren't any of the BA.LLB grads doing an LL.M program if the student quality isso good?From what I have heard LL.M. students in NLS are treated like garbage.Also,why did you ask the admission officer about Jindal?You couldhave visited the campus and then made an informed decision.Did you converse with any of the professors?I don't think so.Also,with due regard tomooting,Jindal reached the semi-finals of the Henri Dunant moot court competition and lost to NLS by a narrow margin.The judges in these moot court competitions are biased towards the National Law Schools.This is a fact.I think your juniors failed to mention that.I suggest you be a little more intellectually curious rather than jumping to conclusions.

Look who's talking about publications here. JGLS website mentions publications most of which is either by your faculty or research associates. For god sake, do you people even know how to footnote let alone the footnoting styles...hahaha...Guys you haven't seen the best from the national law school...Our first year students would have more reputed publications than your senior most batch. Trust me I am not running into conclusions. I'v edited papers sent by JGLS students for publications in our journals and have rejected most of them. Some of your seniormost batch students have publications which were actually my course project and they begged me for something so I didn't mind doing some charity. My friends at JGLS told me they just need original papers and their faculty will use all their contacts to get it published. Good luck losers....btw i saw your 3rd grade speaker in Dunant...semis...he didn't deserve to win d best orator....this wasn't just my view but other teams too were shocked at the outcome... no wonder when your team coach was a judge in the preliminary rounds...isn't that foul play..huh...

why has no one commented on the superstud from JGLS with hot girls drooling over him? Although i'm sure it's a fake.

*I would like to clarify that the above comments have not been posted by me and I DO NOT subscribe to any of the views expressed in that comment. Someone has posted these comments in my name. As you can see, anyone can enter any name/location of their choice to defame me.

@ Mayank Suri: Are you playing around in a forum of this repute, which is meant for serious discussions only. Whoever you are, you'll end up nowhere dude. I am sure you are a dude and a playboy too. Go play with your girls.Please don't contaminate a forum like this with your relationship crap. No ones interested . Go to your mumma..You suck

@Akshay Bd: You have a knack for fiction my friend.I have seen the best from National Law Schools and the worst.My sister is from a National Law School and please don't get me started on the number of retards I have seen.You say National Law School is one of the premier institutes in the country.Why isn't it on the list of top 100 law schools in the world.Fine, national law schools have been instrumental in producing some really bright and intelligent students.That's what you claim but what about faculty?And how old are you again?Because looking at the message you have just written,I am guessing you must have not even reached puberty.You sound like a god damn juvenile delinquent.I suggest you get your facts straight before you go around spreading your pseudo comments on how superior your institution is compared to other private institutions.Please try to be a little more professional in your approach whilst expressing your opinions on this site.Isn't that unprofessional on your part considering you are an alumnus of a very prestigious law school?Oh yes aren't you the guy who got a full scholarship to study in Leiden University?Hahahaha.I am sure they would be gratified to have you as their student.Just don't make a fool of yourself like the way you have done on this site.

@ Akshay, I have seen a lot of research papers that your college mates have written (including yours) and I am sad to say that the quality is pathetic. One of your top ranked classmate told me about people copying commentaries for their projects. Needless to say, it is clear how you people manage your publications, if any. Whereas students in JGLS are failed for the entire course if even a single sentence is copied without citing. Also, the publication part on the website only mentions the publications by the faculty members. Your way of writing gives a good impression of your intellect and inflated mind.

Hey, Im not trying to convince you that you have to appreciate Jindal, but id like to understand why you are so against it. If you actually look at it they have good faculty and good resources. The students who go there seem to display satisfaction at the education they receive. They also seem to enjoy the college experience that they receive there. Finally why do you think everything Jindal does is a publicity stunt. Jindal is new and they need to inform potential aspirants through some medium that they're doing a good job( at least until they have their first batch graduating). The above report is by Ernst and Young which is an established institution, there report definitely has some credibility and publishing it in the media, will give an indication to potential aspirants that the school is doing well in such a short phase

Completely agree with Student@JGLS.Guys from other law schools need to visit JGLS and study the activities it is doing before making such biased observations.Both E&Y and FICCI are respected organisations and their reports are respected and considered not only by industry but also by the government.JGLS is emerging as a law school in a similar manner as ISB became India's top B'school.

Blah....blah...blah....I am not surprised by this report published by FICCI...because there are as many as 4 people from Jindal group who are holding executive posts in FICCI (including Mr. Naveen Jindal)....I made my point...Ciao!

to PAPA FROM NLS, NEW DELHI, irrespective of who is on the the FICCI we are doing a good job and everyone's pretty happy with the education they receive and the cost that they pay.Unfortunately Jindal does not have the acronym NLS written anywhere on it, so it is really difficult for us to brand it to the public. In light of this it is essential for us to post such reports and tell the world that at least there is a stamp of approval from some quarter.Even if you were to assume that the report is biased,Institutions like Ernst and Young and FICCI have at least conceded that it is worth compromising their image and time towards publishing such a report. The Indian legal education market seems to have a high percentage of captive users for the NLS brand, therefore new institutions can afford to open a school design a logo that has terms like "national law university" or "school" fixed in its name and then use a standardized test like "CLAT" and thus manage to not spend a single cent on advertisement or publicity to attract its students. In fact all national schools are a cartel and they use their captive chicken brained audience to deliver a message to the entire world that "education is only for the intelligent" "if you pass our entrance test then you should consider yourself intelligent", and finally "you will succeed only if you go to one of our national law schools ". Thus it is national law schools that indulge in false advertising, but they don't use the media as the medium, they condition their chicken brained students to bad mouth anyone that tries to compete against them. The way i see it, national law school is like the IBM of 90's while Jindal Global law school is like 'apple'. Their philosophy of education is built on Jiddu Krishnamurti's concept of education and most importantly they make their student view law as an art thus attempting to generate more passionate people in the process.