Bar & Bench News Network
Luthra and Luthra Law Offices has partnered with the Gujarat National Law University (GNLU) as an “Official Law firm Partner” for the 3rd GNLU International Moot Court Competition (GIMC) which is scheduled to be held from February 9 to 13, 2011.
Luthra and Luthra Managing Partner Rajiv K. Luthra said, “GNLU though among the younger National Law Schools is fast emerging as one of the premier law schools in the country and this collaboration will give us a platform to directly interact with law students from India and abroad and simultaneously promote our twin objectives of creating awareness about laws governing the WTO trading system and enthusing students to the practice of International Trade law”.
The Firm will award internships at its offices to the members of the Winning / Runner’s up team and the team winning the Best Memorial award. The problem of GIMC features an interesting mix of Space Law, Privacy Laws and International Trade Law. It explores the legal dimensions of satellite surveillance and the repercussions of trade sanctions. The judges include Shishir Priyadarshi, Director WTO; Christian Haberli, Senior Research Fellow WTI/ NCCR Trade Regulation; Krista N. Schefer, Professor at University of Basel, Switzerland (author of the moot problem), and Moushami Joshi, Partner International Trade/ WTO law at Luthra and Luthra Law Offices.
Luthra and Luthra International Trade/WTO Partner Moushami Joshi stated, “Moot Courts are excellent platforms for law students to showcase their legal skills, especially on complex subjects like International Trade and it also provides an opportunity for a premier firm like Luthra and Luthra to tap into bright young legal talent through its offer of internships to the winning and best memorial teams”.
The moot has attracted participants from Asia, Europe and USA and judges from the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, Senior Research Fellows from World Trade Institute at Bern, Switzerland and members of the WTO Appellate Body among others.
|
Be the first to post a comment 
Top News
- Re-Upped Round up May 23
- Alternative Law Forum to hold 2 day course on ‘Free Speech law in India’
- BCI to start Phase-Wise Agitation to oppose Higher Education Bill; July 11 and 12 to be Protest Days; Dharna at Jantar mantar in August
- End of Venture Capital Fund Regulations; SEBI notifies Alternate Investment Fund Regulations
- SILF supports Nariman for President of India; Says no one knows the working of the Constitution better
- Re-Upped Round up May 22
- Supreme Court Lawyers Welfare Trust encourages young talent; Introduces 2 annual fellowships
Other Columns
- Issues in the Acquisitions of Technology Companies
- CLAT Guru Rajneesh Singh predicts CLAT 2012 expected Cut Off
- The Five Sins of CLAT 2012
- CLAT- Putting things in perspective, and the way ahead
- Working Title: The Lawyer and the Photographer
- Building a Law School from Scratch: The Story of Christ College of Law
- Tax on share premium: Remedy for money laundering or a startup bottleneck?
The Viewpoint: Indemnification Provisions - Is the fight on the indemnity clause worth the effort?
May 17, 2012 | Bar & Bench brings to you the twentieth article on 'The Viewpoint' series with its Knowledge Partner AZB & Partners. AZB Senior Associate Nandish Vyas and Associate Pranati Ishwar in this article seek to examine the context in which indemnification rights are relevant for acquisition transactions, and also seek to explore if there are areas where they are potentially not worth the comments (4)










