Delhi High Court is to decide whether retired Judges holding constitutional posts on various Commissions can take up private work like Arbitration, opine on matters etc.
In the PIL, Prashant Bhushan appearing for Common Cause, argued yesterday before the Division Bench comprising Chief Justice A.P. Shah and Justice R.S. Endlaw that,"Giving opinions in writing on a point in issue to be produced in a court of law is a violation of Article 124(7) of the Constitution which prohibits a retired judge of the Supreme Court from acting or pleading before any court or tribunal,”
Bhushan continues his drive reform for greater Judicial accountability. The matter is due to come up on March 10 where the Union Government is to submit its stand on the issue.
|
Be the first to post a comment 
Top News
- Alternative Law Forum to hold 2 day course on ‘Free Speech law in India’
- BCI to start Phase-Wise Agitation to oppose Higher Education Bill; July 11 and 12 to be Protest Days; Dharna at Jantar mantar in August
- End of Venture Capital Fund Regulations; SEBI notifies Alternate Investment Fund Regulations
- SILF supports Nariman for President of India; Says no one knows the working of the Constitution better
- Re-Upped Round up May 22
- Supreme Court Lawyers Welfare Trust encourages young talent; Introduces 2 annual fellowships
- Re-Upped Round up May 21










