Law Commission report on multiple SC Benches - thumbs down from AG, CJI

Feb 01, 2010

The 229th report of the Law Commission which proposed instituting four regional benches of the Supreme Court to ease the burden of the present Supreme Court has run into an insurmountable roadblock.

The report proposed dividing the Supreme Court into a Constitutional Bench at Delhi and 4 cassation branches of the Supreme Court in the North, East, West and South regions at Delhi, Kolkata, Mumbai and Hyderabad or Chennai respectively.

The Ministry of Law had sought the opinion of Attorney General Ghoolam Vahanvaty who classified the recommendation as unworkable. Now, the Chief Justice, K.G. Balakrishnan has expressed his reservations.

Speaking to at the R.K. Jain Memorial Foundation Lecture at Delhi, he made it clear that he was not in favor of the ‘disintegration’ of the Apex Court.  “It is a final court and we should maintain the integrity of the Supreme Court,” he said.

Senior Counsel K.K. Venugopal however felt that an additional appellate court between the High Courts and the Supreme Court would be beneficial. Agreeing with the suggestion, the CJI felt that there was nothing wrong with ‘restructuring’ the Supreme Court. “Personally, I feel that it cannot be in any other part of India. I cannot let the Supreme Court disintegrate,” he added.

 

Add to My Clips Print this Story Email this Story

 

Facebook LinkedIn MySpace Digg Del.icio.us twitter

Comments(1)
  • 1. "Instead of opening SC Benches at other places raising the number of SC Judges and quality of expediting the disposal of cases can cut down the pendency.To respond to the question of transparency cultivated and clean practitioners should be elevated to be panacea to problems.". Pradeepta Mishra, HC Of Orissa, Cuttack
Post Your Comment

Name* :

Location :

Email Id :

Comment * :

Notify me when there is a comment


 

Thank you. Comments are subject to moderation.