Bar&Bench News Network
He wears three hats at the same time. He is a Professor, Vice Chancellor and Dean of a law school that many say will revolutionize legal education in India. He is a Rhodes Scholar, a Landon Gammon fellow and a James Souverine Gallo Memorial Scholar. C. Raj Kumar, the brains behind Jindal Global Law School, talks to Bar & Bench about his baby.
Beginnings:
The core motivation for thinking about such an institution is my own personal background. Having studied in India, Oxford and Harvard, the first idea on possibilities came when as a student I felt that the kind of vibrant intellectual discourse that took place at Oxford and in Harvard should be available in India. Then I graduated, worked in New York, and then I decided to move into academia. The immediate thing was you know, we in India, should have institutions of that kind. The US is an interesting place. While institutions there are built largely on endowments, institutions here are largely public.
Institutions like Yale, NYU, Harvard have so much to contribute to the society in many ways, and not just the intellectual academic environment. In India, on the other hand, institutions are at best, looked as great employment agencies.
I took up a faculty appointment in Hong Kong, which was essentially an eye opener. The culture of research was dominant. I basically proposed an idea of global law school in India to Professor Peter Schuck of Yale Law School, later a Fulbright fellow. Simply, it was an outrageous idea to think of a global law school with an international board, and people were very supportive. Then in 2006 for the first time I met the then law minister, H.R. Bharadwaj and I shared the idea of a global law school on the lines of Harvard and he was very excited about this. He said that we need somebody who is ready to put in some 200 crores of rupees in a philanthropic manner, and is happy about it. He introduced me to Naveen Jindal in 2006. Mr. Bharadwaj and Jairam Ramesh encouraged Naveen to meet me. I used to meet Naveen Jindal almost every month the whole of 2007. The first half of 2007 went in convincing Naveen that it is worth for him to put 200 plus crores and the second half went in convincing him to do so in a philanthropic manner.
LSAT – CLAT
Our law school is a global law school. When envisaging and conceptualizing the vision for the global law school, the emphasis was on globality; the curriculum, courses, programs, research, interaction, faculty, had to be global. We looked at admission models worldwide, and found out that the most popular model was the Law School Admission Test; Australian, Chinese, Canadian law schools are adopting the Law School Admission Test. So we decided to get the LSAT for the first time. The kind of entrance examination we want to have should be beyond any jurisdiction; it must be universally recognizable and adaptable. What everybody is feeling about the Common Law Admission Test is that, the questions in legal aptitude, General Knowledge are silly. The LSAT is time tested and through a lot of empirical work have identified logical reasoning, analytical reasoning and reading comprehension which are identified as necessary to be good lawyer. So we adopted them and brought it into India for the first time.
A Global Law School
I’ve always believed that what the National Law Schools have done is revolutionize legal education in India. National law Schools are institutions which challenged the status quo at a time when it was considered inferior every other profession.
I don’t comment on the quality of the other institutions; I can only say what we do. There has been a globalization of everything, so a lawyer moves and transfers across jurisdictions and areas of work with ease and increasing frequency. So it becomes essential for our lawyers to have a very strong foundation not only in domestic law but also in international and comparative law.
We want to be financially independent as soon as possible and the only way we can be financially dependent is to any institution can get revenue through sources. We developed a structure on the base of which we want to be financially independent. This institution should not be dependent on any donor. We charge 5 lakhs per annum for a 5 year programme and for 3 year programme, 3 lakhs per annum.
Reform
What happens is in the engineering context; Microsoft, Wipro and all these guys set up at Hyderabad and Bangalore, and they train the engineers for one and half years. This is what has to happen in law if we need to radically transform. The issue has to be addressed in a central manner of all educational enterprises. Amartya Sen has in his book mentioned specifically that one should not underestimate the importance of financial incentives for people’s motivations to do work. We need to radically restructure and impose standards and accountability, so that our teachers have to produce and create knowledge to contribute to the establishment of the society.
Corporate, Academics
If you pick up the top 10 law schools of the country, and you talk to the top 40 students, I would say 95 percent of them or maybe more would not have the remotest inclination to enter academics. You do a similar thing in US, or Australia or UK, you would be surprised that a good number of them want to enter academics.
There are a lot of things that has to happen to the society. Academia is not respected in the India society. We are conscious that the most important thing is the faculty. We would not blame the students if they did not make an effort to get into academics. You need to make it attractive, at a general level, we need to raise the profile of academia, we need to raise the quality of faculty, we need to make it more exclusive, make it far more rigorous, a highly demanding and prestigious engagement and make the life of a professor attractive in many ways in terms of benefits , perks, privileges, and that I believe would have a trigger effect.
Magazines, Ranking and Ethics:
I have only one problem with that. It is a very serious problem. First of all anywhere in the world has their limitations. My only problem with any ranking is the potential conflict of which the magazines and the news papers themselves might have with related to their advertising revenue coming from the institutions to their rankings, and it is hugely problematic, affecting the credibility of the ranking process itself. But these are useful tools these are useful indicators and it should be done in far more rigorous, absolutely independent, based on academic standards.
I’ve had reputed magazines and newspapers coming to us asking us to put an advertisement, and along with it you get an editorial story. It is ridiculous, downright dishonesty and is no longer talked in hush hush manner. I don’t think the top management places know about it probably but it is a part of the marketing thing they do.
Post Graduate Courses:
We believe that post graduate education is extremely critical for the future development of the law. That is where any form of specialization can take place. And today, specialization is inevitable. There are so many complex areas of law. Structuring them, reading them, understanding them; it will be unfair to do that in the normal educational context; so many intricacies involved in it, so we are planning to develop multiple types of LLM programs, which I believe has the potential to transform the landscape of the post graduate programme. One, developing specialized LLM programs in areas of law which are of huge contemporary relevance, to the corporate world, trade world, public policy etc. Then we are also looking at multi jurisdictional degrees, where students from two universities come together; for example India and Australia, and they both offer degrees. There are regulatory issues that need to be worked out.
Globally, the LLM is a one year programme. In India, post-graduate degrees are at least for 2 years. That is the UGC thing, so I hope in the years to come we will be able to convince the UGC institutions to make this transition. There is absolutely no logic to have a 2 year LLM programme when everybody has a 1 year LLM programme.
|
- 1. "Questions in 'Legal Aptitude' are silly!!! Kid us not. ". Sachin, Goa
- 2. "This guy is so full of himself. I have met him a few times - some amount of humility could help him.". Anon, Mumbai
- 3. "You should come and see how JGLS has been built and it is only because and Professor Rajkumar, the place has been built in such a manner. He is a person who has superb connections and has taken a new law school to already great heights. i think people are taking his confidence to lack of humility, which is terrible. Go and do somework before you start talking about others humility and also put your name if you want to give advise on humility. So that we know". Kumar - JGLS Student, Delhi
- 4. "Kumar, Humility and confidence can very well go hand in hand.. there is no need to confuse between the two; time will speak of what he has done.. we will have to wait to see his products when they are out in the market; not sure how many bright students chose JGLS over National law schools; and finally, sucking up in public can only take you a certain distance in life.". Vijay Anand, Mumbai
- 5. "I am not from the jGLS or from the NLS. But i have visited JGLS and have interacted with Mr. Rajkumar. His western education and his experience broad may indicate to some that he does not have the humility, but i feel that he is a very friendly person. I dont know how Vijay Anand or Anon have noticed. Naveen jindal must have thought 100 times before choosing a person to head the Law School. Also, i have seen people unnecessarily praise JGLS or abuse them. They are yet to prove their mettle and i must say that the NLS's are doing very well. Even globally very few private universities have made name when compared with their government universities. So while it may be true in India, JGLS has a long way to go before it can prove that it can be one of the best.". Not From JGLS, Bangalore
- 6. "I am amazed that Prof. Kumar even chose to return back to India. I didn't believe it when I first heard about it. I know that too many people like Prof. Kumar with degrees from Oxford and Harvard, Rhodes Scholar and then of course jobs in New York, Tokyo and Hong Kong never return to India for an academic job. I came to know from a friend at Harvard that he was most recently offered a high profile human rights job at the UN which he turned down. This guy is a true visionary. I have not met him, but have read his writings in some of the most prestigious American law reviews and he is simply prolific. A few years back, the UNDP engaged him to write a report on corruption in Sri Lanka and he wrote an amazing report after a fact finding mission there. I want to visit JGLS, but my colleagues here in the USA right from Harvard, Yale, NYU and Columbia have given huge support to this law school. They seem to have got everything right and the most impressive of all is their faculty. But in India, everybody and everything is a suspect. I hope that good sense will prevail upon people to know and understand how challenging institution building is and it takes an obsessive person to make such huge sacrifices to be engaged in institution building. ". Guest, New York
- 7. "This is an article which would encourage global legal education standard in India but,one thing which will pinch a commoner is the cost at undergraduate level where the students are supported by parents as there is no culture and means in India earn while you learn which is prevalant in forign countries like USA , Austrlia or HongKong where Prof. Kumaran has received his education and worked and is a common feature in any part of the world and any stream of education.It will be very good step if post graduate courses shold be made for one year which will be the encourging step for all enthusiastic scholars who want to persue the same including me.". PUSHPA JHURANEY, Punj Lloyd Haryana
- 8. "I have personally interacted with Raj. Most of it has been professional in nature and not at a personal level. My experience tells me that he is a gentleman. I have myself founded a law school which saw reasonable amount of success in the last 4 years. I must say that most people who are in leadership positions have to consider a lot of different issues which the person criticizing is not privy to. As a result there would be some who may feel disillusioned. It happens many a times when instituional priorities are placed ahead of ones own priorities. And on the personal front, I take the stand that it does not matter how the person is as long as it is not in anyway affecting his professionalism. ". John, California
- 9. "so inspiring to read....law here in India has been a subject which students once opted out of compulsion, not choices, seems, soon, here too students will have a reason to join Law". Anubhav, Haryana
- 10. "The innovative thought behind establishment of JGLS is praiseworthy. It is difficult to establish an institution with such thought, and more difficult to sustain the quality and standard, and the founder(s) have appreciably perceived it. No doubt the quality of legal education has gone tremendously high in India in the past decade and has also helped legal community of the conflict affected Nepal that has and will also face many post-conflict uncertainties. For JGLS, one of the research area can bethe role legal community in Nepal played in the past in the country's political changes, for judicial independency, to provide access to justice, support in developmental aspects and helping people. The future thought is for positive and enabling legal environment for people's benefit and to support suffering society needing multifarious changes and development for economic upliftment. Best wishes, ". Anil Sinha, Kathmandu
- 11. "If that man does not have the slightest humility that you guys are expecting out of him, then Mr. Naveen Jindal would have never given him such an opportunity. I feel sorry for those who do not appreciate the effort put in by our Vice Chancellor and in the end these mere words/comments do not matter as sooner or later JGLS will be one of India's most influential law school. And lastly Mr. Anand a law school makes a student smart and bright... its not the other way round. ". Karl Rustomkhan (JGLS Student), Mumbai
- 12. " || Nahi Jnanena sadrsham || ||Nothing is equivalent to knowledge || VIDYA VIKASA TRUST (Regd.,) (A PUBLIC CHARITABLE TRUST) Office: "Shankaranaryana Nilaya", ". Vidya Vikasa Trust(R), Bangalore City
- 13. "I have been in school for 15 years.... Again for next 5years if i am been made to got to school, then I am to certainly think upon, when i am going to be out of this spoon feeding approach and act upon by myself by realizing the real and practical world. The above comments no doubts were like child like.... Good to listen to the debate.... ". Susheel S Nair, Banglore
Other Interviews
- In Conversation: Arvindh Pandian, Additional Advocate-General of Tamil Nadu
- Conversation with Dr. Gerald Reger, Partner and India Practice Head, Noerr
- Interview with Bimal Patel, Vice Chancellor at GNLU
- Conversation with Attorney General of India, Goolam E Vahanvati
- Interview with Stefano Cardinale, Managing Partner at Bridge Mediation Italy
- Interview with Professor Faizan Mustafa, Vice Chancellor of National Law University Orissa
- Interview with Prof. Simon Chesterman, Dean at Faculty of Law, National University of Singapore
Top News
- BCI to start Phase-Wise Agitation to oppose Higher Education Bill; July 11 and 12 to be Protest Days; Dharna at Jantar mantar in August
- End of Venture Capital Fund Regulations; SEBI notifies Alternate Investment Fund Regulations
- SILF supports Nariman for President of India; Says no one knows the working of the Constitution better
- Re-Upped Round up May 22
- Supreme Court Lawyers Welfare Trust encourages young talent; Introduces 2 annual fellowships
- Re-Upped Round up May 21
- Clasis Law moves to a larger office space in Delhi
Issues in the Acquisitions of Technology Companies
May 21, 2012 | DSK Legal Partner Narendra Dingankar and Manager Mini Raman in this article highlight the issues related to the acquisitions of technology companies from purely legal perspective. For this purpose, the authors have segregated the issues into two categories (1) Key Deal Issues; and (2) Regulatory Issues. comments (2)
- Issues in the Acquisitions of Technology Companies
- CLAT Guru Rajneesh Singh predicts CLAT 2012 expected Cut Off
- The Five Sins of CLAT 2012










