Mass judicial transfers: Need for transparency?

Bar & Bench News Network

Sep 14, 2010

With the Chief Justice of India, S.H. Kapadia being lauded for his bold move in the mass transfer of 20 judges in ‘public interest’, some questions have been raised regarding the manner in which the transfers have taken place. One such concern has been expressed by a member of the Bar Council of Rajasthan (BCR), S.K. Gupta. The Times of India reports that Gupta has written to the CJI seeking the names of the judges who might be transferred to the Rajasthan High Court.

 

In his letter, Gupta alleges that in the past, lack of transparency and knowledge have led to more harm than good to the state’s judiciary and said the ‘public interest’ reason must be made public in order to avoid confusion.

Punjab & Haryana High Court

 

Notwithstanding the BCR member’s reservations regarding the transfer process, the 3 judges of the Punjab & Haryana High Court whose names have been recommended for transfers have given their assent to be transferred to a different posting. Justices Ashutosh Mohunta, Vinod Kumar Sharma and H.S. Bhalla have written that they have “no objection” to their transfers, reports Express India

 

An official communication seeking their response to their transfers had been sent by them last week. It has been reported that out of the trio, one judge had said that it would be convenient if he could be transferred to a ‘Hindi speaking’ posting, but his request was turned down.

 

While Justice Mohunta is to be transferred to the Andhra Pradesh High Court, Justice Vinod Kumar Sharma and Justice H.S. Bhalla are likely to join Madras and Orissa High Courts, respectively.

Jammu & Kashmir High Court

The Hindu has reported on the musical chairs that is about to take place with the mass transfers that is recommended by the CJI. It reports that in a major reversal of the nearly two decades-old judicial transfer policy that the Chief Justice of a High Court must be from outside the State, the Supreme Court collegium has recommended that Nisar Ahmad Kakru, who hails from Jammu and Kashmir, be posted as Chief Justice of the Jammu and Kashmir High Court. Justice Kakru was made Chief Justice of the Andhra Pradesh High Court only in February. The present Chief Justice of the J&K High Court, Aftab Hussain Saikia, is being sent back to the Gauhati High Court as its Chief Justice. Justice Saikia belongs to Assam. Chief Justice of the Gauhati High Court Madan Lokur is being shifted to the Andhra Pradesh High Court.

Justice Soumitra Sen

 

It is interesting to note that the mass transfer has come in the shadow of the findings of the probe panel against tainted Calcutta High Court judge, Justice Soumitra Sen; the panel has found Justice Sen guilty of misappropriation of funds. Former CJI, K.G. Balakrishnan had recommended his impeachment.

 

Despite the probe panel submitting its report to the Rajya Sabha recommending the impeachment, Justice Sen has defended himself saying that his conscience is clear and that he will defend himself even in the Parliament if the need arises.

 

Justice Sen’s lawyer has criticised former CJI Balakrishnan saying that he should have distanced himself from the probe panel after he recommended Sen’s name for impeachment. Justice Balakrishnan had set up the probe panel. The lawyer also accuses Justice Balakrishnan of bias saying that both Justice Sen and Justice Nirmal Yadav had been the subject of the probe panel’s investigations and yet only Justice Sen was recommended for impeachment. 

 

Add to My Clips Print this Story Email this Story

 

Facebook LinkedIn MySpace Digg Del.icio.us twitter

Comments(6)
  • 1. "Yes It is good that transfers are going to take place in fact all those judges whose kits and kins practiceing should be transfered forth with.". Pramod K Jain Sr. Adv, (Unknown City?)
  • 2. "Of course it is too late in transferring the tainted judges yet it is welcome one. i thought Mr. Justice Jeyabal one of the Judges of Madras high court is transferred mainly his order of allowing the anticipatory bail application of two accused involved in correcting the mark sheet i.e in this matter the earlier anticipatory bail application was dismissed by his Lordship Justice Mr. Ragupathy and the present Union Minister Mr. Raja had contacted the Judge Mr. Ragupathy and had threatened to allow the application. after this row, for the very same accused persons whose anticipatory bail applications were dismissed was later allowed by the order of this Judge Mr. Jeyapal. i think this may be a very serious violation of judicial norm committed by him. Of course there may be many who knows? i appreciate CJI'S ACTION. MAY GOD GIVE HIM COURAGE AND GUIDE HIM.". S.VEDIAPPAN, ADVOCATE, Chennai-14
  • 3. "Of course it is too late in transferring the tainted judges yet it is welcome one. i thought Mr. Justice Jeyabal one of the Judges of Madras high court is transferred mainly his order of allowing the anticipatory bail application of two accused involved in correcting the mark sheet i.e in this matter the earlier anticipatory bail application was dismissed by his Lordship Justice Mr. Ragupathy and the present Union Minister Mr. Raja had contacted the Judge Mr. Ragupathy and had threatened to allow the application. after this row, for the very same accused persons whose anticipatory bail applications were dismissed was later allowed by the order of this Judge Mr. Jeyapal. i think this may be a very serious violation of judicial norm committed by him. Of course there may be many who knows? i appreciate CJI'S ACTION. MAY GOD GIVE HIM COURAGE AND GUIDE HIM.". S.VEDIAPPAN, ADVOCATE, Chennai-14
  • 4. "The action of Honble C J I of transfering high court judges is highly appreciable.It will stengthen the faith and confidence on indian judiciary". Pushplata Tewari Social Worker, House No. 34 Block-B Shyam Nagar Near Defence Colony Kanpur Uttar Pradesh
  • 5. "I certainly agree with this school of thought that transparency is the bed rock of any judicial system.It is said that justice is not only to be done but it has to be seen to be done.Lawyers with flourishing practice are hesitant to join the Bench for the simple reason that their elevation will bring a change of station and especially Hon'ble members of the Bar from the city beautiful, and many other cities where they were born and brought up, can not think of leaving the city of their choice on any account.Similarly this shifting of family to another city: lock stock and barrel is not with out difficulties, which every one may not be able to face.Thus many legal luminaries refuse to rise from bar to the bench only on this sordid factum.As suggested by this author,time and against that the tenure of the every member of the higher judiciary should be life long or till incapacitated, whether mental or physical.We can have very strict yardstick while making a choice of the candidate but once selected let him be a judge for life so that he works beyond pulls and pushes.The judge has to be a recluse from day one till his last journey on the globe.As the things are the Union of India is a party in litigation and no human being can dare to annoy the powers that be, and face the music for the rest of his life. We must appreciate that the judges are also human beings from the same soil as the laity and they have also risen after breathing the same ambient atmosphere.May the constitution be amended to bring such like radical changes."Vande Matram."". Prof. P S Sawhney, (Unknown City?)Chandigarh
  • 6. "Reports are saying that there are Correption in the Higher Judiciary, it is a very serious issue for CJI who is the Head of the Judiciary.To prevent and erradicate corruption all machineries of the State should come forward to support the CJI move in this regard and every citizen of our country should support this and any move in this regard by CJI is a welcome move". Govind, Chennai
Post Your Comment

Name* :

Location :

Email Id :

Comment * :

Notify me when there is a comment


 

The Viewpoint: Indemnification Provisions - Is the fight on the indemnity clause worth the effort?

bullets

 

May 17, 2012 | Bar & Bench brings to you the twentieth article on 'The Viewpoint' series with its Knowledge Partner AZB & Partners. AZB Senior Associate Nandish Vyas and Associate Pranati Ishwar in this article seek to examine the context in which indemnification rights are relevant for acquisition transactions, and also seek to explore if there are areas where they are potentially not worth the  comments (4)

 

 

Thank you. Comments are subject to moderation.