Bar & Bench News Network
The Chief Justice of India, S.H. Kapadia has given a green signal to the Central Bureau of Investigations (CBI) to probe the alleged role of Justice Nirmal Yadav (pictured) of the Uttarakhand High Court. The “Solan land scam” could lead to a possibility of re-opening the “cash-at-door” also, "cash-in'bag" controversy for Justice Yadav.
Early this year Justice Yadav was transferred from the Punjab & Haryana High Court to the Uttaranchal High Court as she was named in the cash-at-door scandal.
Having filed closure report in the Trial Court last year, the CBI demanded revival of the case by inquiring about the irregular purchase of land in Solan, by Justice Yadav and her relatives. CBI claims that the cash delivered mistakenly at the doorstep of Justice Kaur was actually meant for Justice Yadav for payments to be made towards the Solan land deal. What delayed the progress in the ongoing investigation was an observation in the file by an investigating officer, requiring fresh permission from the CJI for proceeding with the probe into the land scam.
The Indian Express reports an in-house committee, constituted by previous CJI K.G. Balakrishnan, had concluded that a packet of Rs. 15 lakh ($32,500) which was delivered to the residence of another judge of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, Justice Nirmaljit Kaur, on August 13, 2008 was actually meant for Justice Yadav. Justice Yadav denied all allegations in this regard. Last year, the Law Ministry had given Justice Yadav a clean chit on the advice of then Attorney General Milon Banerjee who said that the agency did not have evidence to prosecute Justice Yadav in the case.
The Times of India has reported that Justice Yadav was kept off from judicial work for more than a year at the Punjab & Haryana High Court before she was moved to the Uttarakhand High Court. The CBI claims it has evidence to link the mistaken delivery of Rs. 15 lakh ($32,500) at Justice Nirmaljit Kaur’s residence, although the cash-in-bag was meant for Justice Nirmal Yadav.
With the approval of the CJI Justice S.H. Kapadia, the CBI now can investigate both, the “Solan land purchase” and the “cash-at-door” controversy against Justice Nirmal Yadav .
|
- 1. "All are equal before Law. Judge are not come from heaven. They also humanbeing. And the also have all kind of misbehavier. So the detail edenquiry will show the truth of the incident. so CJI order is correct.". Sankarkumar.s, Chennai
Related Stories
- Cash-at-Door Scam: Fresh trouble for former Judge Nirmal Yadav
- Singhi & Co obtains demerger approval for Idea Cellular from Gujarat HC
- CJI in cash-in-bag storm
- Law Firms bidding begins on EIL: Six firms shortlisted
- Dinakaran problem continues: probe panel reconstituted
- Dinakaran probe committee told that it has civil court powers
- After Justice Dinakaran, probe panel in hot water: Forum for Judicial Accountability seeks recusal of Justice Sirpurkar
Other News
- End of Venture Capital Fund Regulations; SEBI notifies Alternate Investment Fund Regulations
- SILF supports Nariman for President of India; Says no one knows the working of the Constitution better
- Re-Upped Round up May 22
- Supreme Court Lawyers Welfare Trust encourages young talent; Introduces 2 annual fellowships
- Re-Upped Round up May 21
- Clasis Law moves to a larger office space in Delhi
- Re-Upped Round up May 18
The Viewpoint: Indemnification Provisions - Is the fight on the indemnity clause worth the effort?
May 17, 2012 | Bar & Bench brings to you the twentieth article on 'The Viewpoint' series with its Knowledge Partner AZB & Partners. AZB Senior Associate Nandish Vyas and Associate Pranati Ishwar in this article seek to examine the context in which indemnification rights are relevant for acquisition transactions, and also seek to explore if there are areas where they are potentially not worth the comments (4)










