Bar & Bench News Network
The Supreme Court has stayed the Kerala High Court judgment which had declared the election of Congress MP Kodukunnil Suresh as void. The MP hailed from Kerala's Mavelikara (Reserved SC) Lok Sabha constituency and was disqualified on the charge of holding a false caste certificate.
A bench of Justices Altamas Kabir and A.K. Patnaik, while staying the HC order, posted the matter for final disposal on September 16. The apex court also issued notices to Communist Party of India candidate A.S. Anil Kumar and two other voters N.S. Saji Kumar and Padmakaran, on whose petition the election was nullified by the High Court.
The Supreme Court passed the order on an appeal filed by the MP challenging the High Court order. The Kerala High Court had on July 26 declared Suresh's election void after holding that he was not entitled to claim the benefits and privileges available to the members of the Scheduled Caste.
Allowing the election petition of defeated candidate Anil Kumar and two others, Justice M. Shasdhidharan Nambiar of the High Court had found that Suresh was not a member of 'Cheramar' community and thereby he was not a Scheduled Caste. In the 194-page judgment, Justice Nambiar held that he is ‘disqualified’ to contest from the Mavelikkara constituency as it is reserved for the Schedule Castes. The court found that Suresh had produced contradictory caste certificates issued by tehsildars of Kottarakara and Nedumangad. Media reports indicate that Suresh first entered the Lok Sabha in 1989 from the Adoor constituency and subsequently thrice from the same constituency in 1991, 1996 and 1998 and was declared elected from Mavelikkara with a majority of 48,046 votes in the 2009 elections.
Axon Partners briefed Senior Counsel P.P. Rao who argued on behalf of the Kerala MP. Partner Abhimanyu Bhandari led the Axon team. The lawyers on record were Lawyers Knit & Co.
|
- 1. "[edited]". Guest, Delhi
- 2. "What is the deal with Axon? I thought they were a corporate law firm? A two member outfit is pretty active.". Question, Mumbai
- 3. "Axon represents the new age law firms in india. Although people may attribute their success to their inheritance. I must say that the guys have really worked hard. There are more than half a dozen senior advocates sons who are practicing in delhi. no one has done as well as Axon. ". LLP, New York
Related Stories
- Bail condition of the day: Hoist the National Flag
- Khaitan, Axon advise on United Bank of India IPO
- Karanjawala & Co., Mukul Rohatgi, Siddharth Luthra bail out Satyam Auditor
- Even Andhyarujina cannot bail out Ramalinga Raju
- Congress to connect with lawyers
- The Legal Counsel Congress India 2010” – In-house lawyers and their changing roles
- Axon Partners and Norton Rose on Shiv Vani’s Oil & Gas FCCB
Other News
- End of Venture Capital Fund Regulations; SEBI notifies Alternate Investment Fund Regulations
- SILF supports Nariman for President of India; Says no one knows the working of the Constitution better
- Re-Upped Round up May 22
- Supreme Court Lawyers Welfare Trust encourages young talent; Introduces 2 annual fellowships
- Re-Upped Round up May 21
- Clasis Law moves to a larger office space in Delhi
- Re-Upped Round up May 18
The Viewpoint: Indemnification Provisions - Is the fight on the indemnity clause worth the effort?
May 17, 2012 | Bar & Bench brings to you the twentieth article on 'The Viewpoint' series with its Knowledge Partner AZB & Partners. AZB Senior Associate Nandish Vyas and Associate Pranati Ishwar in this article seek to examine the context in which indemnification rights are relevant for acquisition transactions, and also seek to explore if there are areas where they are potentially not worth the comments (4)










