Bar & Bench News Network
The ongoing war between the Ministry of Human Resources and Development (HRD) and the Law Ministry, sees no respite. According to a report by the Hindustan Times, the Law Ministry wants to take control over powers given to the Bar Council of India (BCI), an independent regulator, which regulates and has control over the legal education and profession in India.
The draft Higher Legal Education and Research Bill, 2010 (Law Ministry Bill) proposed by the Law Ministry imposes for creation of a National Commission to regulate legal education.
The Law Ministry Bill intends to counter the HRD Ministry’s, National Commission for Higher Education and Research Bill, 2010 (HRD Ministry Bill). The National Commission proposed in the Law Ministry Bill will comprise of a Chairperson, six members to be appointed on the recommendation of a selection panel headed by the Prime Minister along with the Attorney General, Chief Justice of India or a nominee of the CJI and the Law Minister.
A BCI functionary, speaking with the Hindustan Times (talking about the Law Ministry Bill) said, “It runs contrary to the provisions of the Advocates Act, 1961, which (BCI) regulates legal education and profession.”
A Law Ministry official told Hindustan Times, “The draft Bill is at a consultation stage. All issues would be sorted out with the BCI. After all we provide funds for its functioning.”
On the other side, the Planning Commission is overriding the Law Ministry’s plan of setting up five Centres for Advanced Research in Law (CARL) across India. The objective of the Centres for Advanced Legal Studies and Research Bill, 2010 is to provide cutting-edge research and to serve as a think tank for advising the Government. CARL will also work towards improving faculty quality of various law colleges in India.
The Planning Commission which controls the funding for projects seems unconvinced over establishing CARL and does not concur with the Law Ministry’s views. The Planning Commission justifies, saying that there is no need for separate funding to the Law Ministry as it already gets funds from the HRD Ministry and the University Grants Commission, for its research in specific subjects.
A Planning Commission official said to the Hindustan Times, “The Indian Law institute has been given money in the past for doing research on issues related to law.”
A Law Ministry official told Hindustan Times, “The Law Ministry is hopeful of winning the Plan panel’s nod for its project. We will place our case firmly before the Planning Commission and we are confident that they will listen to us and provide adequate funds.”
|
- 1. "After health and agriculture ministeries were able to get themselves segregated from MHRD's National Commission for Higher Education and Research Bill, why Law Ministry should lag behind. But the point is Advocates' Act need to be amended or more precisely to be re-drafted afresh so that Bar Council of India should keep control over only the legal profession and not the whole gamut of legal education in the country.". HEMANT KUMAR ADVOCATE, Amb?la City Haryana
- 2. "ADVOCATES ARE DEDICATING ALMOST TIME FORCLIENT.GOVT SHOULD THINK ABOUT PROTECTION,PROMOTION OF THE ADVOCATES.SHOULD BE GIVEN CHANCE BY RESERVATIONIN HIGHER EDUCATION FOR PRACTICING LAWYER.". Bhuban Bihari Mohanty, Bhubaneswar
Related Stories
- Law Minister reveals plans to revolutionize legal education: Four law schools of excellence in the works
- Foreign Universities Bill - BCI, Directorate of Legal Education oppose
- Critical Overview of the Higher Education and Research Bill, 2010
- MMB Legal, DSK and Wadia Ghandy on TeamLease raising Rs. 100 crore to fund its education expansion
- BCI and HRD Ministry in tug-of-war over legal education
- S.N. Gupta expands into infrastructure with Planning Commission's Rashi Anand Suri
- En route quality legal education - young faces for professors?
Other News
- End of Venture Capital Fund Regulations; SEBI notifies Alternate Investment Fund Regulations
- SILF supports Nariman for President of India; Says no one knows the working of the Constitution better
- Re-Upped Round up May 22
- Supreme Court Lawyers Welfare Trust encourages young talent; Introduces 2 annual fellowships
- Re-Upped Round up May 21
- Clasis Law moves to a larger office space in Delhi
- Re-Upped Round up May 18
The Viewpoint: Indemnification Provisions - Is the fight on the indemnity clause worth the effort?
May 17, 2012 | Bar & Bench brings to you the twentieth article on 'The Viewpoint' series with its Knowledge Partner AZB & Partners. AZB Senior Associate Nandish Vyas and Associate Pranati Ishwar in this article seek to examine the context in which indemnification rights are relevant for acquisition transactions, and also seek to explore if there are areas where they are potentially not worth the comments (4)










