Bar & Bench News Network
Minister of Law and Justice Veerappa Moily addressed the Lok Sabha on ‘Reservation in Judges Posts’ and said, “The appointment concerning Judges of the Supreme Court and the High Court’s made under Article 124 and 217 of the Constitution of India does not provide for reservation for any caste or class of persons. The State Governments frame rules in consultation with the High Court for recruitment of persons to Subordinate judiciary, in exercise of powers conferred under proviso to Article 309 read with Article 233 and 234 of the Constitution. Therefore, the service conditions, appointment, promotion, reservations, etc. of judicial officers of the District / Subordinate Courts are concern of the respective State Governments.”
On the issue of ‘Grants for Evening Courts’, Moily said, “All 87 Evening Courts were reported to be functional in Gujarat as on May 5, 2010. The Central Government has not received any proposal in the recent past for central assistance by the State Government. An earlier proposal from the State Government for central assistance was not agreed to as there was no such scheme under which central assistance could be provided to the States for Evening Courts.”
He further added, “That in acceptance of the recommendations of the Thirteenth Finance Commission, grants have been provided for the State Governments, including for the State of Gujarat, for operation of Morning / Evening / Shift Courts. The amount allocated for Gujarat for this purpose is Rs. 161.17 crore for the five year period 2010-11.
|
- 1. "hope it never happens...the country has already been ruined by vp singh and arjun singh". Guest, Mumbai
- 2. "does it means that 2.5 billion people from the concerned section doesn't have merit.which is a perogative of 500 hereditery judges.". Alankar, Jamshedpur
Related Stories
- Moily: Budget outlay for the upgradation of the judiciary
- Allegations of humiliation adds to Judiciary's woes
- Law Minister's Vision Statement- larger judiciary, work till midnight, case not to exceed 3 years
- D.R. Meena is Law Secretary; T.K. Viswanathan is Moily's advisor
- Law Minister Moily bags Moortidevi Award for literary skills
- RTI should not infringe on Judiciary's independence, says AG
- Judges in trouble: Justices Dinakaran and Soumitra Sen; Moily moots anti-corruption bill
Other News
- End of Venture Capital Fund Regulations; SEBI notifies Alternate Investment Fund Regulations
- SILF supports Nariman for President of India; Says no one knows the working of the Constitution better
- Re-Upped Round up May 22
- Supreme Court Lawyers Welfare Trust encourages young talent; Introduces 2 annual fellowships
- Re-Upped Round up May 21
- Clasis Law moves to a larger office space in Delhi
- Re-Upped Round up May 18
The Viewpoint: Indemnification Provisions - Is the fight on the indemnity clause worth the effort?
May 17, 2012 | Bar & Bench brings to you the twentieth article on 'The Viewpoint' series with its Knowledge Partner AZB & Partners. AZB Senior Associate Nandish Vyas and Associate Pranati Ishwar in this article seek to examine the context in which indemnification rights are relevant for acquisition transactions, and also seek to explore if there are areas where they are potentially not worth the comments (4)










