Bar & Bench News Network
No passport, no play, says Delhi High Court
The Hindustan Times has reported that the Delhi High Court on Tuesday firmly slammed the door on Persons of Indian Origin (PIOs) and Overseas Citizens of India (OCIs) aspiring to represent India in international sports events, saying they owe their allegiance to their adopted countries. Upholding the Sports Ministry's policy, the court said, "There is a justification in insisting that only Indian passport holders should represent India in an international sporting event. Those with foreign passports obviously owe their allegiance to the countries of which they hold passport."
Bar & Bench had previously covered the issue of the OCIs' legal battle to be allowed to play for India. Their legal fight had some big name counsels who sought to represent their interests including Senior Counsels Mukul Rohatgi and Rohinton F. Nariman.
CBI ropes in top lawyer to deny Raju bail
The Deccan Chronicle has reported on how the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has engaged the Solicitor General of India to oppose the bail petition of B. Ramalinga Raju, the prime accused in the multi crore Satyam scam, before the Andhra Pradesh High Court.
T. Niranjan Reddy, the special public prosecutor of the CBI, on Thursday, informed Justice Raja Elango that the Solicitor General, Gopal Subramanium, will appear in the case, and urged the judge to adjourn the matter to August 12.
Tit for tat? BCCI wants recusal of Lalit Modi lawyer
DNA has reported on how the Lalit Modi case took a new turn on Sunday when the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) asked one of his lawyers to recuse himself from the case. The BCCI demand was a sort of counter-attack on the Modi camp which has been insisting on the recusal of at least two of the three members— Arun Jaitley, Chirayu Amin — of the disciplinary committee. Jyotiraditya Scindia is the other member.
|
- 1. "Jim, Sorry to hear but Your friend should contact a Personal Injury Lawyer for a free consultation, here is a good one that I know Link wish she feels better soon". Sharonjo, Oakpark
Related Stories
- Re-upped Round up: August 5
- Re-upped Round up: August 11
- Re-upped Round up: August 23: Munnabhai & Circuit get trademarked; Moily launches advocates training scheme
- Re-upped Round up: August 24: Am Law and Above the Law on Outsourcing
- Re-upped Round up - June 21: Surrogacy Laws, Office space, soliciting lawyers and ULIPs
- Re-upped Round up: June 22: Reservation for locals in NLSIU, Moily on Bar Exam, Law against sexual harassment, Law School grading in America
- Re-upped Round up: June 23: I-bankers get 16,550 and law firms get 1 crore, Bar Exam, Dinakaran, Legal Reforms, Courts on wheels, Nepal Constitution
Other News
- End of Venture Capital Fund Regulations; SEBI notifies Alternate Investment Fund Regulations
- SILF supports Nariman for President of India; Says no one knows the working of the Constitution better
- Re-Upped Round up May 22
- Supreme Court Lawyers Welfare Trust encourages young talent; Introduces 2 annual fellowships
- Re-Upped Round up May 21
- Clasis Law moves to a larger office space in Delhi
- Re-Upped Round up May 18
The Viewpoint: Indemnification Provisions - Is the fight on the indemnity clause worth the effort?
May 17, 2012 | Bar & Bench brings to you the twentieth article on 'The Viewpoint' series with its Knowledge Partner AZB & Partners. AZB Senior Associate Nandish Vyas and Associate Pranati Ishwar in this article seek to examine the context in which indemnification rights are relevant for acquisition transactions, and also seek to explore if there are areas where they are potentially not worth the comments (4)










