Bar & Bench News Network
The Bombay High Court has granted an ex-parte injunction restraining a local manufacturer from infringing Hindalco’s trademark ‘Freshwrap’ and copyright in respect of artistic works and acts of passing-off of their products, ‘Fresshpack’.
Hindalco Industries Limited, flagship company of the Aditya Birla Group, is the world's largest aluminium manufacturing company and has annual sales of more than $5 billion (Rs. 22,500 crore).
The Court also passed an Ex-parte order appointing the Court Receiver to take possession of the infringed goods pursuant to which raids were conducted in Mumbai and Pune at 21 places and the infringed goods were seized by the Court Receiver. DH Law Associates represented Hindalco and was also involved during the raids that were conducted at the premises.
Partner Sidhartha Shrivatsava led the team from D.H. Law Associates along with Associate Partner, Sarojini Patil and Associate, Umang Jaju. Speaking to Bar & Bench, Sidhartha said, “Hindalco was being affected by continued counterfeiting of its products.These raids indicate the seriousness of the company against counterfeiting its products”. According to a Financial Express report, metals counterfeit causes companies to lose nearly Rs. 60 billion ($1.3 billion) every year. A FICCI survey has estimated the loss of revenue to the Indian exchequer by way of taxes to be roughly around Rs. 1,000 crore ($216 million) a year.
|
Be the first to post a comment 
Related Stories
- McCurry win adds to McDonalds' list of trademark losses
- Khaitan closes NEA investment in reverse outsourcing company
- Talwar Thakore advise on 2009's largest QIP- Axis Bank raises 3490 crores
- Google Adwords trademark troubles now hit Google India- Madras HC asks Adwords to delete Bharat Matrimony
- Kannagi Amman trademark challenged; Yet another Laddu challenge
- Anand & Anand persuades Delhi HC to invoke 'John Doe' principle in Ray-Ban trademark matter
- Hogan & Hartson may merge with Lovells to create third-largest law firm in the world
Other News
- End of Venture Capital Fund Regulations; SEBI notifies Alternate Investment Fund Regulations
- SILF supports Nariman for President of India; Says no one knows the working of the Constitution better
- Re-Upped Round up May 22
- Supreme Court Lawyers Welfare Trust encourages young talent; Introduces 2 annual fellowships
- Re-Upped Round up May 21
- Clasis Law moves to a larger office space in Delhi
- Re-Upped Round up May 18
The Viewpoint: Indemnification Provisions - Is the fight on the indemnity clause worth the effort?
May 17, 2012 | Bar & Bench brings to you the twentieth article on 'The Viewpoint' series with its Knowledge Partner AZB & Partners. AZB Senior Associate Nandish Vyas and Associate Pranati Ishwar in this article seek to examine the context in which indemnification rights are relevant for acquisition transactions, and also seek to explore if there are areas where they are potentially not worth the comments (4)










