Bar & Bench News Network
The CBI (Central Bureau of Investigations) Judge AY Dave on July 25 has sent former Home Minister, Amit Shah to judicial custody till August 7. Shah has been charged with murder, kidnapping, extortion and destruction of evidence in the fake encounter killings of gangster Sohrabuddin and his wife Kauser Bi in the year 2005.
Shah quoted, the charges against him as "fabricated and politically motivated". Referring to Sohrabuddin, he alleged that forty AK-47 rifles, about a hundred grenades and Rs 1 lakh ($ 2,200) worth of ammunition were recovered from his house. He resigned from the State Government on July 24.
Shah is being represented by Senior Advocate Ram Jethmalani the President of the Supreme Court Bar Association along with criminal lawyers from Gujarat, Nirupam Nanavati, Devang Nanavati and Mitesh Amin. Former Law Minister Ram Jethmalani was also nominated as the Rajya Sabha MP from BJP last month and is supposed to be close to the Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi.
Earlier today, N.K. Amin, presently in prison and Ex- Assistant Commissioner of Police (ACP) through his lawyer Jagdish Ramani said, he is filing for his client Amin, to become an approver in the case.
Rajesh Modi is also representing Amin who said "There is a threat to Amin's life from the other accused as all are lodged together in the Sabarmati Central Jail here. So we have decided to move an application for jail transfer for Amin."
|
Be the first to post a comment 
Related Stories
- SC asks CBI Counsel KTS Tulsi to withdraw from Sohrabuddin Fake Encounter Case
- Khaitan & Co. represent Mahindra in cybersquatting case
- Law Minister's Vision Statement- larger judiciary, work till midnight, case not to exceed 3 years
- Home Minister-Law Minister lock horns; Solicitor General chases US authorities for Headley
- CCI on home loans cartel case: “No question of abuse of dominance by the banks”
- Airlines Cartel Case: Amarchand, Luthra and Pasrich represent foreign airlines and Indus law represents TAAI before CCI
- Bombay High Court admits appeal against Shah Rukh Khan
Other News
- End of Venture Capital Fund Regulations; SEBI notifies Alternate Investment Fund Regulations
- SILF supports Nariman for President of India; Says no one knows the working of the Constitution better
- Re-Upped Round up May 22
- Supreme Court Lawyers Welfare Trust encourages young talent; Introduces 2 annual fellowships
- Re-Upped Round up May 21
- Clasis Law moves to a larger office space in Delhi
- Re-Upped Round up May 18
The Viewpoint: Indemnification Provisions - Is the fight on the indemnity clause worth the effort?
May 17, 2012 | Bar & Bench brings to you the twentieth article on 'The Viewpoint' series with its Knowledge Partner AZB & Partners. AZB Senior Associate Nandish Vyas and Associate Pranati Ishwar in this article seek to examine the context in which indemnification rights are relevant for acquisition transactions, and also seek to explore if there are areas where they are potentially not worth the comments (4)










