Bar & Bench News Network
A murder at the Karnataka High Court premises has shocked not only the legal fraternity, but the entire city. A 25 year old advocate, J.S. Naveena was stabbed in the neck in front of Court Hall number 4 at 1:50 pm yesterday. Advocate Rajappa who claimed to be in love with her stabbed Naveena in the court premises. After stabbing Naveena, Rajappa tried to commit suicide by stabbing himself.
However, Rajappa has survived after his suicide bid and is now in the police custody. Rajappa in his 2-page suicide note had written, "No one is responsible for my action. Our love affair is the reason behind it, about which our family members and friends were unaware. I don't want to stay back here after troubling her. She is keeping away from me, listening to her family members. If her life is going to be better by doing so, I will be happy. Without my knowledge, she is getting into bad behaviour. There is a mobile phone in my office in which there are photos. There is a pen drive also. If I die alone, Naveena and her senior Prakash Shetty will be responsible for that. They are conspiring against me."
|
Times of India has reported eye witness reports on the incident. Eyewitnesses said the gory act took place around 2pm when S L Rajappa, an advocate, stopped J S Naveena between court number three and four. They seemed to have a short, hissy conversation after which Rajappa pulled out a knife and stabbed her in the chest, slashed her head and slit her throat. A heavily bleeding Naveena collapsed right there even as Rajappa tried to stab himself. Azeemuddin, an advocate on his way to the washroom, witnessed the macabre drama. "It was lunch hour. When I went to the washroom, I saw the two speaking with each other near court hall 4. Then, as I came out, I saw the girl fall down with blood gushing out of her wounds. The next moment I saw that senior counsel Subrahmanya Jois was trying to give her water," Azeemuddin said. He says he had barely recovered from the sight when he turned to see Rajappa trying to stab himself. "I tried to stop him, but he pointed the dagger towards me menacingly. I shouted that I would call the police. He ran to the washroom and locked himself in. The police arrived and broke open the door. He was inside with injuries to his chest with a bottle of poison next to him," Azeemuddin added. Senior advocate Jois recalled: "It was probably 1:52 pm when I saw a man and a woman (the young advocates) in the court corridor. Suddenly, I heard the woman scream. Blood gushed out of her wounds, and her voice was hoarse," he said. "I yelled for the police, and tried to get the man who was running away. He ran towards the washroom, knife in hand. I locked it from outside as he bolted himself in. I rushed back to the spot where the girl had collapsed and gave her some water, but she couldn't drink. There was no police at the spot because it was lunch hour," Jois added. |
Rajappa was Naveena’s senior from the Government Law College, in Kolar. The police have recovered a note from Rajappa's pen drive, which runs into more than two pages. The writing suggests that he was obsessed with Naveena. Police suspect that Rajappa, otherwise a soft-spoken man, wanted Naveena to live the way he wanted her to, but Naveena was focussed on her career. She spoke little and was a workaholic.
|
DNA spoke to the family of the murdered advocate Naveena. “They were not in favour of Naveena practicing law in Bangalore,” her uncle JV Narayanaswamy said. “They wanted her to get married and settle down in Chintamani.” She graduated from a college in Kolar and finished her five-year law course also in Kolar, her uncle said. “She wanted to practise law and that was the reason she chose to come to Bangalore. She was the eldest child in the family. She had two younger brothers” “She was determined to excel,” her close friend Manjula, who was also her classmate, said. Manjula was one of the last persons Naveena saw before she was murdered. She said Naveena had never mentioned Rajappa’s name to her. “Naveena was a very dear friend. I’ve known her for five years,” she said. “I had spoken to her a few minutes before the incident. She did not sound disturbed,” Manjula said. |
The High Court has decided to increase security measures at the premises after this incident. Karnataka State Law Minister Suresh Kumar speaking to media said, “It was a freak accident and the Government would take all steps to ensure security at the High Court”.
|
- 1. "It is highly unfortunate that an advocate has killed her lover with knife in the High Court premises. More than the murder, what worried me is that an advocate used knife that too in the High Court premises. The noble profession should be allowed to stoop to this level.Our system of education should include moral ethics and our age-old good culture.By J.Venkat, Chennai". J.Venkat, Chennai
- 2. "The above article seems oblivious of the security at the Karnataka High Court in Bangalore. One has to pass through a metal detector before entering the high court premises. It is highly unfortunate Mr.Rajappa could get away hiding concealing a knife. Wrong day for the High Court Police to sleep. ". Spoorthy Mottera, Gandhinagar
- 3. "its Shocking..lawyers oneself breaking the laws..law abiders become the law brockers...The situation is not clear right now...it will be more cleared after listing the words of the Adv.Rajjapa..but what ever happened in a high court ...takes the security of high courts in to a question of consideration.if this is the security of high court we can imagine the security of district courts.Any one can do any thing at any time in a courts to anyone, either the evidence , Advocates or judges...". Gourav, Australia
- 4. "You are right Venkat,First, the basic primary and high school education system should include the day to day legal aspects of this nation.Prasad.". Silent Angel, Bangalore
Related Stories
- Bar vs. Bench in Karnataka High Court: Protest against Dinakaran turns violent as advocates go on a rampage and assault HC judge
- High Fees: Orissa lawyer files a PIL against Government paying 25 lakh per day to Senior Advocate Mukul Rohtagi
- Petition before Bombay High Court challenging exorbitant fees charged by Senior Advocates
- Bombay High Court admits appeal against Shah Rukh Khan
- Arun Jaitley persuades Delhi High Court to dismiss Bayer plea
- Guwahati High Court appoints contract judges to handle backlog
- Delhi High Court okays ADF
Other News
- End of Venture Capital Fund Regulations; SEBI notifies Alternate Investment Fund Regulations
- SILF supports Nariman for President of India; Says no one knows the working of the Constitution better
- Re-Upped Round up May 22
- Supreme Court Lawyers Welfare Trust encourages young talent; Introduces 2 annual fellowships
- Re-Upped Round up May 21
- Clasis Law moves to a larger office space in Delhi
- Re-Upped Round up May 18
The Viewpoint: Indemnification Provisions - Is the fight on the indemnity clause worth the effort?
May 17, 2012 | Bar & Bench brings to you the twentieth article on 'The Viewpoint' series with its Knowledge Partner AZB & Partners. AZB Senior Associate Nandish Vyas and Associate Pranati Ishwar in this article seek to examine the context in which indemnification rights are relevant for acquisition transactions, and also seek to explore if there are areas where they are potentially not worth the comments (4)










