Bar & Bench News Network
President Pratibha Patil inaugurated a 5-day Tamil Conference that is being conducted with an estimated Rs. 400 crore ($88 million) bill. While the Tamil Nadu’s Chief Minister Karunanidhi’s dream Tamil conference was on its way, lawyers are fighting hard demanding Tamil be made the official court language. Lawyer body, All India Junior Advocates' Association has already filed a PIL in the Supreme Court pointing out High Courts in Rajasthan, Bihar, Madhya Pradesh that have allow Hindi.
Separately, before the Madras High Court, government counsel, A.K. Ramasamy, secretary of Madurai Bar Association, appeared in plainclothes as a party-in-person to argue a public interest litigation (PIL) petition filed by him to provide adequate medical treatment for the six lawyers. He argued the entire case in Tamil and the High Court bench said that it was not opposed to advocates arguing in Tamil which prompted lawyers to use Tamil in the principal seat and at the Madurai Bench.
The Hindu reports about the first case that was argued entirely in Tamil. Another report from The Hindu also covers Jaitley’s opinion on the Anderson case where former Law Minister, Arun Jaitely had felt that the extradition case against Warren Anderson was extremely weak. The paper also goes on to mention that Jaitley had also represented Dow Chemicals in his personal capacity as a Senior Advocate.
The Express Buzz reports on The Advocates Association of Bangalore and constitutional experts urging Justice Santhosh Hegde to re-consider his decision to resign. The Lokayukta chief had resigned yesterday following his frustration with successive State governments in not giving greater powers to the Lokayukta.
India Today reports that the State education ministers are backing the demand of the Ministry of Human Resource Development for including medical and legal education under a single overarching authority for all branches of higher education called the National Commission for Higher Education and Research.
|
Be the first to post a comment 
Related Stories
- Re-upped Round up: June 29: Shardul Shroff on non-executive directors, CCI, Judges flying Economy Class, Calcutta High Court, Baxi and Justice A.P. Shah
- Re-upped Round up - June 21: Surrogacy Laws, Office space, soliciting lawyers and ULIPs
- Re-upped Round up: June 22: Reservation for locals in NLSIU, Moily on Bar Exam, Law against sexual harassment, Law School grading in America
- Re-upped Round up: June 23: I-bankers get 16,550 and law firms get 1 crore, Bar Exam, Dinakaran, Legal Reforms, Courts on wheels, Nepal Constitution
- Re-upped Round up: June 25: Bar exam again, Lawyers released, Shipping laws, LPO, Pak bans 7 websites
- Re-upped Round up: July 20 - Moily on Foreign law firms, No appointment through exams, SC accepts Justice Ahmadi’s resignation
- Re-upped Round up: July 7: Special and Constitutional Bench, GNLU students help reduce backlog in Gujarat High Court, ASG Amarjit Singh Chandhiok backs private firm, Nariman on Judges Appointment
Other News
- End of Venture Capital Fund Regulations; SEBI notifies Alternate Investment Fund Regulations
- SILF supports Nariman for President of India; Says no one knows the working of the Constitution better
- Re-Upped Round up May 22
- Supreme Court Lawyers Welfare Trust encourages young talent; Introduces 2 annual fellowships
- Re-Upped Round up May 21
- Clasis Law moves to a larger office space in Delhi
- Re-Upped Round up May 18
The Viewpoint: Indemnification Provisions - Is the fight on the indemnity clause worth the effort?
May 17, 2012 | Bar & Bench brings to you the twentieth article on 'The Viewpoint' series with its Knowledge Partner AZB & Partners. AZB Senior Associate Nandish Vyas and Associate Pranati Ishwar in this article seek to examine the context in which indemnification rights are relevant for acquisition transactions, and also seek to explore if there are areas where they are potentially not worth the comments (4)










