Bar&Bench News Network
In an unexpected turn of events, 18 judges of the Karnataka High Court on Wednesday publicly declared their assets on the court’s official website.
Earlier, Justice D.V. Shylendra Kumar who after being declined permission from posting his asset details on the court website, proceeded to do so on his blog. Justice Shylendra Kumar’s details are also up on the court website. The Judges have not only posted their personal financial details but also those of their immediate family.
Responding to a report published in a national daily, that only 19 judges of the Karnataka High Court, the Registrar General of the High Court, A.P. Murari, has issued a press note that of the 36 judges sitting in the High Court, 8 judges are yet to declare their assets, and 6 other judges have elected not to publicly disclose their assets on account of a lack of legislation.
The press note reads as follows: “Out of 33 Hon’ble Judges, including the Chief Justice, only 19 Hon’ble Judges have volunteered to web-host their assets and liabilities. Among the rest, six Hon’ble Judges have specifically stated that their statement of assets and liabilities shall not/need not be web-hosted; some Hon’ble Judges have stated that their statement of assets and liabilities be kept in the sealed cover and one of the Hon’ble Judge has stated that he is reluctantly declaring the assets and liabilities as there is no legislation, however, have left it to the discretion of the Hon’ble Chief Justice to place the same in public domain. The Hon’ble Chief Justice, therefore, has no option except to wait for arriving at a consensus for web hosting the assets and liabilities of all Hon’ble Judges, except those who volunteered to web-host it. Hence, it is not correct to say that only 19 Hon’ble Judges of the Karnataka High Court alone have declared their assets and liabilities.”
Justices Manjula Chellur, K. Shreedhar Rao, N. Kumar, K. Bhaktavatsala, Mohan Shantana Goudar, H. Billappa, S. Abdul Nazeer, B.S. Patil, V. Jagannathan, C.R. Kumara Swamy, Ashok B. Hinchigere, A.S. Bopanna, N. Ananada, A.N. Venugopala Gowda, Arali Nagaraj, A.S. Pachapure, K.N. Keshav Narayana and Arvind Kumar were the justices who declared their assets.
Recently, Bar & Bench carried a report on how six months after the judges of the Supreme Court published their assets, judges of only 4 of the 21 High Courts, numbering 173 of the total strength of 630 judges made a clean breast of their finances.
Their asset details can be found at here.
|
- 1. "Has the debate on disclosure of assets died a quiet death after the hype on Hon'ble Justice Dinakaran has died a natural death? Why are the judges of the remaining High Courts avoiding disclosure and why is the media quiet on this front?". Guest, India
- 2. "Dear sir / madam I am manjunath. Son of Mr shivalingappa v. Goudar. (RETIERED ADULT EDUCATION OFFICER.) i am wrotten a complaint for you. MR Shivalingappa verupakshappa goudar. Before a 25 years in a Government Junior college. BIJAPUR. 1978. And his cast is hindu. Lingayat. And he had a marriage that time a second marriage. By R R MULIMANI. A government servent. She has a second wife of mr shivalingappa v goudar. And he has on job in 58 years. And not informed by education department. He had a two wifes. And illegally he have a pension amount. But he had applied all the details of first wife photos. And taken a pension amount and stay with a second wife. Who is she mrs R R Mulimani. But his first wife Mrs shivabasamma shivalingappa goudar. So she has in poor situation. Currently. She has stay in a shed. We are sending all the complaints of education department. But many officers had a both amount from my father. And throw the our complaint in a dustbin. Last time our father is retired post is DIST ADULT EDUCATION OFFICER. 1997. BELGAUM. MAHANTESH NAGAR. BELGAUM. KARNTAKA. We are sending a complaints c c to 1) PUBLIC EDUCATIN DEPARTMENT. AND ADULT EDUCATION DEPARTMENT. DATE: 1995.1.INCOME TAX OFFICER HUBLI AND DHARWAD. DATE: 20/10/2009.1.INCOME TAX OFFICER . BANGLORE.1.SUBURBAN POLICE STATION. DHARWAD.1.KARNATAKA STATE LEGAL AUTHORITY. DATE: 16/11/20091.DIST COMMISSIONER . BELGAUM. All department officer are not responding correctly with me. So they had a money from my father.and closed our complaints and throw the copies in a dust bin. My mother . Mrs shivabasamma shivalingappa goudar. So she has a poor situation. And stay in a shed. We are two sons our mother. When we are a child. This is my father sending only 300=00 theree hundred rupees. When he has retired . He has giving money only 2400=00 two thousand four hundred rupees. And some time he told my mother. His payment is only 5000=00 or 6000=00 . A adult education officer having a payment this. And he has ready to illegally taken a pension amount. Apply the my mother photo. His first wife. And taken a pension money and stay with a second wife. Before a ten years he has not sending any money to my mother. Mrs shivabasamma shivalingappa goudar. And here her address: Mrs. SHIVABASAMMA SHIVALINGAPPA GOUDAR. C/O MANJUNATH S GOUDAR. WARD NO 2. KULKARNI PETH. NEAR SANGAM SIR HOUSE. ILKAL-587125. DIST: BAGALKOT. ST: KARNATAKA MOBILE NUMBER:9241441421. She has talking only on kannada.AND my father address : Mr. SHIVALINGAPPA VIRUPAKSHAPPA GOUDAR. RETD AEO. PLOT NO: 71. SHANTINIKETAN NAGAR. KELGERI ROAD CROSS. DHARWAD. DT: DHARWAD. ST: KARNATAKA. Here is i am informing you. Please take a action with my father. Illegally he had a pesion amount from government. this is kindly for your information. Regards MANJUNATH S GOUDAR. MOB: 8088845283 ". M S Goudar, Banglore
Related Stories
- Madras High Court Judges seek time to disclose assets
- Guwahati High Court appoints contract judges to handle backlog
- Bar vs. Bench in Karnataka High Court: Protest against Dinakaran turns violent as advocates go on a rampage and assault HC judge
- Re-upped Round up: June 29: Shardul Shroff on non-executive directors, CCI, Judges flying Economy Class, Calcutta High Court, Baxi and Justice A.P. Shah
- Re-upped Round up: July 7: Special and Constitutional Bench, GNLU students help reduce backlog in Gujarat High Court, ASG Amarjit Singh Chandhiok backs private firm, Nariman on Judges Appointment
- Mass transfer of High Court Judges: CJI cracks down in public interest
- Karnataka political crisis reaches the High Court: Sorabjee for the CM, PP Rao and K.G. Raghavan for dissident MLAs
Other News
- End of Venture Capital Fund Regulations; SEBI notifies Alternate Investment Fund Regulations
- SILF supports Nariman for President of India; Says no one knows the working of the Constitution better
- Re-Upped Round up May 22
- Supreme Court Lawyers Welfare Trust encourages young talent; Introduces 2 annual fellowships
- Re-Upped Round up May 21
- Clasis Law moves to a larger office space in Delhi
- Re-Upped Round up May 18
The Viewpoint: Indemnification Provisions - Is the fight on the indemnity clause worth the effort?
May 17, 2012 | Bar & Bench brings to you the twentieth article on 'The Viewpoint' series with its Knowledge Partner AZB & Partners. AZB Senior Associate Nandish Vyas and Associate Pranati Ishwar in this article seek to examine the context in which indemnification rights are relevant for acquisition transactions, and also seek to explore if there are areas where they are potentially not worth the comments (4)










