Bar&Bench News Network
As Justice K.G. Balakrishnan retires and hands over the reins of one of the largest judiciaries in the world to Justice S.H. Kapadia, Bar & Bench takes a look at his tenure as Chief Justice.
Konakuppakatil Gopinathan Balakrishnan, who was born on May 12, 1945 in Kottayam, Kerala is the 37th and the first Dalit Chief Justice of India. The son of a district court clerk, Balakrishnan studied science at the Maharani College in Ernakulum, Kerala and went on to earn his bachelor’s degree in law in 1968 and his LL.M from the Government Law College, Ernakulum in 1971. He enrolled at the Kerala Bar Association in 1968 and steadily rose in reputation and legal skills.
Justice Balakrishnan served as a judge at the Kerala High Court and the Gujarat High Court before being elevated as the Chief Justice of the Gujarat High Court in 1998 and after that assuming charge as the Chief Justice of the Madras High Court in 1999, before being elevated to the Supreme Court in 2000 and finally being appointed as Chief Justice of India in January of 2007.
While at the Supreme Court, the CJI was responsible for passing some landmark judgements which will impact the face of the Indian legal system for years to come:
Reservation case: In April 2008 the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionally amended law providing 27 percent reservation for backward classes at the IITs, IIMs and other central education institutions, but barred the creamy layers from benefitting from the reservation.
Mining ban in the Aravalis: In May 2009, the apex court forest bench headed by the CJI passed an order putting a blanket ban on the mining of all minerals in the Aravili hills in the state of Haryana.
CBI Investigations: In February 2010, the apex court passed an order allowing the courts to direct the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to conduct investigations without the prior approval of the State Governments.
Narco Analysis: On May 5, 2010, the Supreme Court held that forced narco analysis, brain mapping and polygraph testing is a violation of the Fundamental Rights and cannot be done without the prior consent of the person.
Reliance Judgement: May 7, 2010, in the closely followed Reliance dispute between Mukesh and Anil Ambani, a three member bench headed by the CJI ruled that natural gas is a national asset and government pricing policy holds precedence over any private agreements.
Justice Balakrishnan’s tenure was not without controversy. The lack of transparency in judicial functioning hit his reputation the hardest. The disclosure of judge’s assets, the Right to Information dispute and the criticism of the manner of functioning of the collegiums in its appointment of judges reared their ugly heads simultaneously. Corruption charges on Justice P.D. Dinakaran of the Karnataka High Court and Justice Soumitra Sen of the Calcutta High Court dogged the Chief Justice during the second half of his tenure.
However, many were disappointed when former Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court, A.P. Shah, was overlooked by the collegium for elevation to the Supreme Court. Many believe that Justice Shah’s outspoken nature and radical judgments did not go very well with Justice Balakrishnan.
Justice Shylendra Kumar of the Karnataka High Court was openly critical of Justice Balakrishnan’s views, opinions and policies. Justice Kumar’s articles which appeared at regular intervals on his blog and in editorials in national dailies, was a matter of embarrassment for the latter. Justice Balakrishnan tried to snub Justice Kumar, but failed.
However, whilst the preceding paragraphs does tend to view Justice Balakrishnan in negative light, it can be safely said that it was during his tenure, that the spotlight focused on the need for an overhaul of the system for appointment, elevation and transfer of judges.
President Prathiba Patil swore in Justice Sarosh Homi Kapadia [pictured] this morning. Justice Kapadia was born on September 10, 1947 and cut his teeth at the Bombay High Court. In 1991 he was appointed as an additional judge of the Bombay High Court and was appointed as a permanent judge two years hence.
He was appointed as Judge of the Special Court established under the Trial of Offences Relating to Transaction in Securities Act in 1999 and became the Chief Justice of the Uttaranchal High Court in 2003. He was elevated to the Supreme Court later that year.
During his time as judge of the Supreme Court he has been associated with 771 judgments including the historic five-judge bench judgement in which the court said that laws under the 9th Schedule were open to Judicial Review. He specializes in taxation and financial matters and is due to retire in 2012 when he turns 65.
|
- 1. "I hated the way K.G. Balakrishnan defended vigorously the post of judiciary in the name of 'independence of judiciary'. Further, the in the light of various malicious(prima facie) appointments and transfers, the judiciary also reached new heights of favoritism in the past few years. Not that he was responsible for all of them, but he certainly was accountable to public for these mishaps. It's high time that the higher judiciary reviews the current collegium system and make it more transparent. Lets hope CJI Kapadia does what the outgoing CJI failed to do. ". Harsh, Bhopal
- 2. "Justice K G Balakrishnan has performed very well in every respect.Only uncommoners face healthy ciriticism and not the commoners.He has superanuated very gracefully and not like his precedure. ". Dr Sharma S K, Delhi
- 3. "Heartiest Congratualtions to new icumbent CJI Justice S H KAPADIA, particularly for the altitude having been achieved by him from the lowest step of his career, which is rare of the rarest. Hence once again I congratulate and Salute him. ". Dr Sharma S K, Delhi
- 4. "Justice S H KAPADIA will bring, to the office of the Chief Justice of India, the much required integrity and trust. happy to see a parsi at the helm, where one thing is a guarantee, quality judgements, honesty to the core. congratulations sir.". Khalid, Bangalore
- 5. "Congratualtions to cji justice s h kapadia, i have read number of judgments of income tax law decided in 2009 to 2010 reportered in Income Tax Reporter, the delivery of judgments and ruling is fantastic and very knowledgeable and practical. wish and hope for best judgments with practical solutions with the present changed scenario." SUDHIR MEHTA, ADVOCATE GUJARAT HIGH COURT" ". SUDHIR MEHTA SHAILEE MEHTA THE CHAMBERS OF SUDHIR MEHTA ADVOCATES GUJARAT HIGH COURT, Ahmedabad
Related Stories
- Justice Kapadia joins Justices Raveendran and Katju; Recuses from hearing Sterlite matter
- Recusals continue: ITC shares and Nariman's insistence lead to Justice Kapadia's withdrawal
- David Becker and Iain Higgins for ICC and Justice Anand and Goolam Vahanvati for the BCCI
- "Judges have nothing to fear, nothing to hide" says Justice D.V. Shylendra Kumar
- Chief Justice rebukes Justice Shylendra Kumar
- SC allows contempt plea by Salve; Prashant Bhushan faces contempt; calls for impeachment of Justice Dinakaran
- Supreme Court Justice BN Agrawal turns 65, retires
Other News
- End of Venture Capital Fund Regulations; SEBI notifies Alternate Investment Fund Regulations
- SILF supports Nariman for President of India; Says no one knows the working of the Constitution better
- Re-Upped Round up May 22
- Supreme Court Lawyers Welfare Trust encourages young talent; Introduces 2 annual fellowships
- Re-Upped Round up May 21
- Clasis Law moves to a larger office space in Delhi
- Re-Upped Round up May 18
The Viewpoint: Indemnification Provisions - Is the fight on the indemnity clause worth the effort?
May 17, 2012 | Bar & Bench brings to you the twentieth article on 'The Viewpoint' series with its Knowledge Partner AZB & Partners. AZB Senior Associate Nandish Vyas and Associate Pranati Ishwar in this article seek to examine the context in which indemnification rights are relevant for acquisition transactions, and also seek to explore if there are areas where they are potentially not worth the comments (4)










