Bar&Bench News Network
The Supreme Court today issued a notice to the Gujarat government to appear before it in relation to the notification banning Jaswant Singh's book. Senior Counsels Fali S. Nariman and Soli Sorabjee appeared on behalf of Jaswant Singh and argued that the notification was violative of his fundamental rights. The Supreme Court has admitted the petition and posted the matter for hearing on the 8th.
Yesterday, the Gujarat High Court also heard the PIL filed before it, challenging the notification. Under fire for not having enumerated grounds for the ban on his book, the Additional Advocate General, Tushar Mehta submitted that publication of the prohibited paragraphs would defeat the purpose of the ban on publishing the book.
When the Government clarified that it would issue another notification stating specifically the reasons for the ban, the Bench snubbed the AAG saying, "We are here to judge this notification, not the improved notification". Chief Justice Radhakrishnan, heading the Full Bench, said, "The notification must show an application of mind. These are mere words here and there.''
The Gujarat state government had banned Singh's book within two days of its release. The ban was challenged on technical grounds that the notification did not give reasons, as there was nothing in it that could cause disharmony between two groups. The High Court will hear the matter again on Tuesday.
|
- 1. "Time for Modi to hold his lungi tight with Fali and Soli on the other side.". Aparna, Delhi
- 2. "I have no words to appreciate the advocacy of Mr. Nariman and Mr. Sorabjee in favour of Mr. Jaswant Singh's fundamental rights being encroached by the ban of his book in exercise of one notification.After all, right to freedom of speech can not be seen in any narrow and communal eye.Nor, the said right be withheld under fright of executive might.Prior to a decision of injurious action on a work of creative analysis an in-depth reading is a must. Any superficial assessment in partisan spirit damages the quality of citizenship and is by all its entirety a miscarriage of justice and misinterpretation of the Constitution.". Pradeepta Mishra, HC Of Orissa,Cuttack
- 3. "Mr. Nariman is known by the work he has done in past since from the Golaknath's case. And he has the abilitiy to protect the right thing. So also Mr. Sorabjee.I appreciate their work. And ofcourse the work of Jaswant Singh.". Khurana, Ferozpur (punjab)
Related Stories
- 1000-Crore Deals back on the Street
- PIL against ban on Jaswant Singh's book
- Karanjawala represents Jaswant Singh in the Supreme Court
- Gujarat HC lifts ban on Jaswant's book
- Poovayya moves Delhi office; expands Government & Regulatory Law practice
- Reliance Saga, Days 5 and 6: Jethmalani accuses Government of siding with RIL as Salve concludes arguments
- Shocked by the latest disaster? File a PIL; Rajasthan HC admits PIL on IOC fire
Other News
- End of Venture Capital Fund Regulations; SEBI notifies Alternate Investment Fund Regulations
- SILF supports Nariman for President of India; Says no one knows the working of the Constitution better
- Re-Upped Round up May 22
- Supreme Court Lawyers Welfare Trust encourages young talent; Introduces 2 annual fellowships
- Re-Upped Round up May 21
- Clasis Law moves to a larger office space in Delhi
- Re-Upped Round up May 18
The Viewpoint: Indemnification Provisions - Is the fight on the indemnity clause worth the effort?
May 17, 2012 | Bar & Bench brings to you the twentieth article on 'The Viewpoint' series with its Knowledge Partner AZB & Partners. AZB Senior Associate Nandish Vyas and Associate Pranati Ishwar in this article seek to examine the context in which indemnification rights are relevant for acquisition transactions, and also seek to explore if there are areas where they are potentially not worth the comments (4)










