Foreign Universities Bill - BCI, Directorate of Legal Education oppose

Bar&Bench News Network

Mar 17, 2010

“A larger revolution than even in the telecom sector awaits us,” were the opening lines from Kapil Sibal, the Union Minister for Human Resource Development, when he was presenting the Foreign Educational Institutions (Regulation of Entry and Operation) Bill, 2010 (Bill) before the Cabinet. Kapil Sibal feels that entry of foreign universities in higher education will lead to an increase in choices, encourage competition and benchmark quality.

In 2007, the Union Cabinet had cleared the Foreign Universities Bill, but its allies, the Left parties, had opposed the Bill. Now with the Left out of the picture, the Union Cabinet has once again cleared the Foreign Universities Bill.

This time, it is the turn of the Bar Council of India (BCI) and the Directorate of Legal Education (DLE) to oppose the Bill. S.N.P Sinha, the BCI Chairman had told media persons that, “The State Bar Councils and the BCI have decided to oppose the Bill and wants deliberations before the final draft is tabled before the Parliament”. The Bar Councils have also asked their members to wear black bands in protest on March 22.

Speaking to Bar & Bench, the newly appointed Vice Chairman of BCI, Faisal Rizvi said “We are not opposing entry of foreign universities, but are opposing the controls and regulations governing them. Even China has allowed foreign universities with certain riders and regulations attached. We are also opposing the manner in which these Universities are being introduced”. “Government has not bothered to consult with Vice Chancellors of Indian universities on the effect of such Bills on the existing Universities and the manner in which they are governed” he added.

Bar & Bench also spoke to Professor V.B. Coutinho, the first Director of the DLE and former Dean of the University Law College, Bangalore, who along with the BCI, have opposed the Bill for different reasons. DLE was set up early this year to shoulder the responsibility of legal education and is set to prepare an action plan on the subject for the next decade.

Here are excerpts of the conversation with Professor Coutinho:

Foreign Law firms’ back door entry

Foreign Law Firms are waiting for entering India. By allowing Foreign Universities, even they (Foreign Law firms) will get back door entry into the Indian legal market. Bombay High Court has stopped them from entering, but we do not want Foreign Universities Bill to support these foreign law firms.

One step will lead to the other. If Foreign Universities are allowed, then the Foreign Firms may want the students who have graduated from these Foreign Universities to be employed and later forcing the country to open doors for them.

Commission vs BCI

Since 1926, BCI has been regulating legal education. Now under the Bill, a Commission, which has strength of 3 permanent members and 3 part time members, will regulate not only legal education, but also the entire higher education in this country. It’s a huge affair and will lead to chaos if not regulated well. You tell me whether such a commission can monitor more than 1,000 law colleges, let alone thousands of other universities?

Quality legal education and affordability

Those who say foreign universities will increase the quality of legal education in India-they are talking rubbish! When the National Law Schools were started in 1987, we had only one; today there are 13 National Law Schools. That’s the way of improving. Foreign Universities will only charge heavy fees and will only get rich students and not the brilliant ones. We must create our own infrastructure, introduce scholarships for the poorer students and stipends for advocates. There are 950 colleges under DLE and we are aware of the need to increasing quality and that cannot happen by bringing Foreign Universities in the existing form.

The George Washington University Law School has a knowledge sharing Memorandum of Understanding with Aligarh Muslim University. Most Indian Universities are keen on western collaborations. Newly established Universities such as Jindal Global Law School charges Rs. 5 lakhs (US$ 10,400) per annum are wooing students with their Global Faculty and approach towards teaching. 

The Parliament session ends on May 7, 2010 and the Bill may be tabled before the Lok Sabha before it closes.

 

Add to My Clips Print this Story Email this Story

 

Facebook LinkedIn MySpace Digg Del.icio.us twitter

Comments(9)
  • 1. "Utter nonsense!Who's this guy? Never heard of him. Surely there are better and more sensible people to interview?". Guest, India
  • 2. "@Guest India - agree with you that some of things seem odd! But this guy is the Director of Directorate of Legal Education. He is responsible for organizing, running, conducting, holding, and administering (a) Continuing Legal education, (b) Teachers training, (c) Advanced specialized professional courses, (d) Education program for Indian students seeking registration after obtaining Law Degree from a Foreign University, (e) Research on professional Legal Education and Standardization, (f) Seminar and workshop,(g) Legal Research, (h) any other assignment that may be assigned to it by the Legal Education Committee and the Bar Council of India. So his views in this context are relevant.". Guest, Delhi
  • 3. "Everyone seems to have a view on this Bill but no-one has even read it, as the Bill has not yet been made available publicly. Lets await to read this ebfore commenting". Guest, Delhi
  • 4. "This is an absurd argument.How does bringing in foreign universities have a connection with foriegn law firms practising in India?What is it that the DLE Coutinho chap is actually thinking?Finally, let competition prevail.. 1000s of law colleges have lacs of students who DO NOT attend college but become LLBs... why not have foreign universities come and try thier hand at better professional creation?". Guest, HYD
  • 5. "I echo these comments. This guy sounds like a fool. Barandbench - you have to be more discerning while interviewing ppl. Unless the point of this is to ridicule him - cos he has made a fool of himself.". Guest, Delhi
  • 6. "I think its good to know what people who run legal education, Bar Council etc think about the future. Although no one cares about what they think we as lawyers should be aware that at some level we are being guided by people who think like this. If Directorate of legal education thinks like this then what is the point?". Krishna, Delhi
  • 7. "It is true that introduction of Foreign Universities Act shall pave the way for recognition of foreign law degrees in India. It looks Government wanted globalisation in legal area without looking into the future ramifications and consequences. Thus indian law education system and judifical systems are best suited to Indian justice dispensation. We need no lawyer to interfere into Indian legal systems.The legal fraternity should strongly oppose the move and if necessary apex court may be approached for appropriate directions in the matter.vedula gopinathLawyer, Hyderabad ap India". Vedula Gopinath, Hyderabad
  • 8. "Foreign Universities Bill is nothing but giving impetus to the monopoly of private players in higher education and more precisely professional education.The State is shrinking and its welfarian nature vanishing slowly by slowly.One thing is very clear and has to be learnt from our own experience of National Law Schools; the number of students graduating form them, joining pure litigation or even lower judiciary, can be counted on fingertips. Have they helped in improvement of our justice administration system? It is a clear cut NO.With the foreign universities setting campuses in India , the situation is going to worsen.We have to generate a mechanism to improve ourselves in our own system and the foreign universities bill is no solution to it.". Nirankar Singh, Lucknow
  • 9. "While opposing the foreign university bill we have to take into consideration the present state of India Legal Education in India, apart from national law schools and few Law colleges in various states, the situation of most of the Law Colleges are in a dismal state. Majority of the teaching staff in these colleges have never visited a Court in their life and soon after completing their academic courses they are recruited directly without any court experience. It is shocking to know that there are Law Colleges where the student doesn’t even have to attend the classes to appear for in their examination. If India is gearing up to be a leading economy it has to improve the training imparted to its Lawyers and this can be achieved only when world class Legal Education is imparted to deserving students in India. In US legal education is considered to be a bastion of brilliant and hard working students who are willing to dole out best effort and employ quality time to acquire a Law Degree. In India in most of the state run Law Colleges are a refuge for people who are cast away during their pursuit for other streams of educations and it is a real hazard for promising students to attend some of the state run Law Colleges in India. This scenario has to change and Law Student should feel responsible and committed to his education for which style of imparting legal education should be revamped and re invented. ". Manoj Nair, Delhi
Post Your Comment

Name* :

Location :

Email Id :

Comment * :

Notify me when there is a comment


 

The Viewpoint: Indemnification Provisions - Is the fight on the indemnity clause worth the effort?

bullets

 

May 17, 2012 | Bar & Bench brings to you the twentieth article on 'The Viewpoint' series with its Knowledge Partner AZB & Partners. AZB Senior Associate Nandish Vyas and Associate Pranati Ishwar in this article seek to examine the context in which indemnification rights are relevant for acquisition transactions, and also seek to explore if there are areas where they are potentially not worth the  comments (4)

 

 

Thank you. Comments are subject to moderation.