Women's Reservation Bill clears Rajya Sabha hurdle - 186 to 1

Bar&Bench News Network

Mar 10, 2010

Currently, India is tied for the 99th spot with a small West African country called Benin in the world ranking for the percentage of women in the Parliament. Although India is a larger democracy in comparison to Benin, it took nearly 14 years for our political leaders to take concrete action. A shame, considering 22 percent and 27 percent of the Parliaments in Pakistan and Afghanistan, respectively, are women.  The Constitution (One Hundred and Eighth Amendment) Bill, 2008, popularly known as the Women’s Reservation Bill, was passed by the Rajya Sabha yesterday, with 186 votes in favor to reserve seats for women.  

History

In 1996, Deve Gowda, the then Prime Minister of India, proposed a legislation to reserve 33 percent seats in the Parliament and a bill was tabled on September 12, 1996.  Geeta Mukerjee (now deceased) was appointed as the Chairperson of the Joint Committee to solicit views and suggestions on the Women's Reservation Bill. The Bill has been unsuccessfully tabled 7 times since, by various governments. For the 8th time in 2008, the then Law Minister, H.R. Bharadwaj, presented the Bill and Congress leader and lawyer Jayanthi Natarajan, was appointed as the Chairperson of the Committee to scrutinize the Bill. This committee included eminent lawyers such as Abhishek Manu Singhvi and Former Law Minister of Karanataka, D.B. Chandre Gowda.

When it was tabled before the Rajya Sabha this time, there was no shortage of drama. Some members of the opposition tried to assault Rajya Sabha Chairman Hamid Ansari, which resulted in the suspension of 7 MPs.

Salient Features

The Women’s Reservation Bill will ensure that 33 percent of the seats are reserved for women in the Parliament and State Assemblies. Women from Scheduled Castes and Tribes will have a 1/3rd reservation for women within the allocated reservation. This means that of the 141 women Parliamentarians, 40 will belong to Scheduled Castes and Tribes.

In some states, like Pondicherry, where there is a single Lok Sabha seat, the reservation has been spread across three general elections with the first one being reserved. Reservation for women will rotate and every constituency will see a woman representative in order to bring a 'horizontal democracy' across various segments of the country. Also, The Bill also proposes this reservation to be applicable only for a period of 15 years. The Committee has in its report proposed that this be increased by another 15 years. 

Political parties are divided on the voting. The Yadav group led by Lalu Prasad Yadav and Sharad Yadav along with Mulayam Singh opposed the Bill on this ground that the reservation system doesn’t benefit the lower strata of the society. The Bharatiya Samajwadi Party, led by Rajya Sabha member and former Advocate General of Uttar Pradesh, Satish Chandra Mishra abstained from voting on the ground that women have to be provided with a reservation of 50 percent since they constitute a proportional percentage of the population. 

While parties disagreed on the various forms and methods of the Bill, no party was vocally against the idea of reservation of women. PRS Legislative Research, an independent research initiative, has summarized the Bill in a legislative brief.

Speaking to Bar & Bench, M.R. Madhavan, part of the core team at PRS said, “This Bill is not very different in concept from the earlier Bill that was presented in 1996. However, there are some changes. The earlier Bill had mentioned that atleast 1/3rd seats are to be reserved, but now is capped to 1/3rd. Secondly, about the reservation to OBC women. Since there is no reservation for OBC men, it was difficult to implement the reservation for OBC women in the Parliament.”

This is not the end we will hear of the Bill. The next hurdle is the Lok Sabha and after that, the State Assemblies. It is assured that the sessions at the Lok Sabha will give sufficient competition to the spectacle at the Rajya Sabha.

Pavitra Anand had earlier written an article for Bar & Bench on the debate. 

 

Add to My Clips Print this Story Email this Story

 

Facebook LinkedIn MySpace Digg Del.icio.us twitter

Comments(5)
  • 1. "331/3% or any other percentage should be based on rate of literacy among women vis-a-vis that of men in India and a reference must be made while fixing the percentage.". R. Brizmohan Singh, Advocate, Hyderabad
  • 2. "this bill will certainly devide our country on gender basis.india has already been devided by way of religion,caste only to fulfill the hunger of politicians.in stead giving reservation,we may initiate steps to make equal with the men.". BIBHU KALYAN PATTNAIK, 4, M.ss.nagar, Bhubaneswar.
  • 3. "We perhaps have forgotten the very objective behind the provision of short term reservation at its inception. All reservation provisions should be recalled and the reservation if any should be a global phenomenon for the real needy as would be defined to an extent say 10-20% to achieve very objective. Or else a situation would reach when contingency would arise for reservation for protected category and it would be non-ending process. Thanks. Samarendra, Bhubaneswar". Samarendra Kumar Mohanty, Bhubaneswar
  • 4. "this bill is against schduled caste and schduled tribes and because of this bill they will become more backward and congress will be liable for all this. From:- Ram Niwas Ranga.LL.B.Final year Kurukshetra University Kurukshetra ". Ram Niwas Ranga, Kaithal(haryana)
  • 5. "I sceduled caste women pursed Master Business Adminstrations Presently working into It,software sap germany based company,I am interested to represent my country.". B.Madhavai, (Unknown City?)secunderabad
Post Your Comment

Name* :

Location :

Email Id :

Comment * :

Notify me when there is a comment


 

The Viewpoint: Indemnification Provisions - Is the fight on the indemnity clause worth the effort?

bullets

 

May 17, 2012 | Bar & Bench brings to you the twentieth article on 'The Viewpoint' series with its Knowledge Partner AZB & Partners. AZB Senior Associate Nandish Vyas and Associate Pranati Ishwar in this article seek to examine the context in which indemnification rights are relevant for acquisition transactions, and also seek to explore if there are areas where they are potentially not worth the  comments (4)

 

 

Thank you. Comments are subject to moderation.