Bar&Bench News Network
Sources have confirmed that the Registry of the Supreme Court of India is filing an appeal challenging the ruling of the Delhi High Court that the office of the Chief Justice of India (CJI) falls within the purview of the Right to Information Act. The 60 days limitation to file an appeal over a judgment of a High Court is due to expire on March 12.
The appeal drafted by Supreme Court lawyer Devdutt Kamat, is said to have met the approval of the registry and the Chief Justice of India. Attorney General, Ghoolam E. Vahanvati will present the arguments on behalf of the Registry of the Supreme Court. The appeal aims to stay the January 12 High Court judgment, that brought to the public domain, correspondence between the CJI and other members of the Judiciary, and the niggling issue of the judges’ assets.
The CJI was quoted saying too much scrutiny will hamper the functioning and independence of the judiciary. However, the three Judge Bench comprising the then Chief Justice A.P. Shah, and Justices Vikramjit Sen and S. Muralidhar had stated that “Judicial independence is not a privilege but a responsibility”.
This development also coincides with the hearing that is to resume today on an appeal filed by the SC registry aiming to thwart the decision of the Chief Information Commissioner (CIC). The CIC had earlier directed the SC to provide information to serial RTI activist, Subhash C. Agarwal, details pertaining to the appointment of three judges to the Supreme Court.
It must also be noted that amidst the entire RTI buzz, the SC judges had voluntarily listed details of their assets as well as of their kin in November last year.
|
- 1. "is supreme court above law?in my opinion the decission of delhi high court is to be honoured.how same person can adjudicate their cause?". BIBHU KALYAN PATTNAIK, 4, M.ss.nagar, Bhubaneswar.
- 2. "I think the decision of the high court should be uphold.which makes the transpency of the office of the CJI". Adv.Gourav Kaushish, Australia
- 3. "the verdict of the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi is simply the thunderstorm in socio-legal and socio-political sphere. The implict dimensinons of this judicial pronouncement is not only going to afftect the legal world only but it will today or tomorrow lead towards the compulsory declaration of the assets of the common citizen as well. This judgment must be seen a a gateway for forthcoming revoution in our country. This judgmnet must not be interefered or if any intereference is required then it shoulf be intereference for strenthening the same only. ". Lalit Kumar Jha, Delhi
Related Stories
- Bombay High Court admits appeal against Shah Rukh Khan
- Swine flu scare in Nalsar, NLSIU
- Cipla scores victory in the Supreme Court
- Glivec appeal to be heard by different bench
- Okaytatabyebye appeal WIPO order in Delhi High Court
- Law in Schools vs. Law Schools
- Rajani scripts Greycells rights issue
Other News
- End of Venture Capital Fund Regulations; SEBI notifies Alternate Investment Fund Regulations
- SILF supports Nariman for President of India; Says no one knows the working of the Constitution better
- Re-Upped Round up May 22
- Supreme Court Lawyers Welfare Trust encourages young talent; Introduces 2 annual fellowships
- Re-Upped Round up May 21
- Clasis Law moves to a larger office space in Delhi
- Re-Upped Round up May 18
The Viewpoint: Indemnification Provisions - Is the fight on the indemnity clause worth the effort?
May 17, 2012 | Bar & Bench brings to you the twentieth article on 'The Viewpoint' series with its Knowledge Partner AZB & Partners. AZB Senior Associate Nandish Vyas and Associate Pranati Ishwar in this article seek to examine the context in which indemnification rights are relevant for acquisition transactions, and also seek to explore if there are areas where they are potentially not worth the comments (4)










