Bar&Bench News Network
Mont Blanc has agreed to stop selling the Mahatma Gandhi Limited Edition pens until further orders of the Kerala High Court. Pravin Anand, Managing Partner of leading IP firm, Anand & Anand submitted to a Division Bench of the Kerala High Court comprising acting Chief Justice P.R. Raman and Justice Ramachandran Nair that the German pen maker has authorised him to undertake that the controversial pens would not be sold until further orders.
The petitioner had filed an application seeking restriction on the sale of the pens till final conclusion of the matter. The Court has now directed Anand to file an affidavit or undertaking within three days and posted the matter to March 1.
In October last year, a Public Interest Litigation was filed in the Kerala High Court against Mont Blanc and its Indian distributor, Entrack International Trading, the Union of India and the Ministry of Consumer Affairs, by Dijo Kappen, the managing trustee of the Centre for Consumer Education at Kottayam. Kappen is being represented by Santhosh Mathew [pictured] and Sathish Ninan of Ninan & Mathew Advocates.
Speaking to Bar & Bench, Santhosh Mathew confirmed the order, a copy of which is available here. Lawyers C.A. Majeed, Deepthi Mary Varghese and K.H. Asif are also appearing on behalf of Mont Blanc and Entrack.
|
Be the first to post a comment 
Related Stories
- Pens and Sensibility: How Mont Blanc is selling brand Gandhi at $24000 a pen
- Mont Blanc's Mahatma Gandhi pen dispute reaches Supreme Court after Advocates file PIL
- AZB conclude IL&FS-Maytas documentation and Reliance stake sale
- Rajasthan HC takes up letter petition as PIL; stays Gujjar reservation
- Nimesh Kampani can finally return to India as AP High Court stays criminal proceedings
- 25 Years after Indira Gandhi: The lawyers in the Indira Gandhi Murder Trial and the 1984 Riots
- Justice V. Giri cites personal reasons for resigning from Kerala HC, looks forward to practicing in SC
Other News
- End of Venture Capital Fund Regulations; SEBI notifies Alternate Investment Fund Regulations
- SILF supports Nariman for President of India; Says no one knows the working of the Constitution better
- Re-Upped Round up May 22
- Supreme Court Lawyers Welfare Trust encourages young talent; Introduces 2 annual fellowships
- Re-Upped Round up May 21
- Clasis Law moves to a larger office space in Delhi
- Re-Upped Round up May 18
The Viewpoint: Indemnification Provisions - Is the fight on the indemnity clause worth the effort?
May 17, 2012 | Bar & Bench brings to you the twentieth article on 'The Viewpoint' series with its Knowledge Partner AZB & Partners. AZB Senior Associate Nandish Vyas and Associate Pranati Ishwar in this article seek to examine the context in which indemnification rights are relevant for acquisition transactions, and also seek to explore if there are areas where they are potentially not worth the comments (4)










