Bar&Bench News Network
When the Andhra Pradesh police dealt with the Telangana agitations with excess amounts of force, it was only a matter of time before somebody took legal action. The Writ Petitions filed by ABN Andhrajyoti News Network reporter and an Osmania University student, who have challenged the use of force and entry of police into the OU campus respectively are two of the several petitions.
Justice L. Narasimha Reddy had issued a temporary injunction barring the police from erecting barriers within the campus and entering the University. The Division Bench of the High Court also dismissed Governments application in the appeal and held that the barricades were unnecessary.
Here are some of the comments of Justice L. Narasimha Reddy, the single judge hearing the writ petitions against police brutality in Osmania University made observations that did not put the Andhra police in good light. The Judge observed that the police were treating Telangana as Pakistan and the OU campus as the Wagah Border. Some of his observations are below:
On Contempt:
“The DGP is busy in fighting his own litigation. He is in need of a court order to continue in the post, but he does not respect an order from the same court. Let Amnesty International step in. This court had ordered the withdrawal of the forces and removal of the barricades on the OU campus. But when I passed by OU this morning, the barricades were still there.”
On Bihar:
“We do not find such kind of a situation in any other part of the country. Even in Bihar, the police obey some agency. It’s all the more unfortunate that such things are happening at a time when a renowned former police officer is the governor of the state. His presence should act as a deterrent on the police. But the reverse is happening.”
On Anjaneyulu:
“Why this hungama? Was there any looting, arson or murder? Even girl students were ill treated. Who is this P.S.R. Anjaneyulu, the Joint Commissioner of Police, who orders mayhem first and then apologises to the media at the end of the day. He must not enter the campus.”
On General Dyer:
“But there is none here to question the lawlessness among our police. There are several Dyers here and your government is not competent enough to control them.”
Additional Advocate General A. Satya Prasad, is appearing for the Government, and evidently is having a tough time defending the state's actions.
|
- 1. "The Judge should not have used the derogatory term , "even in Bihar". It was unwarranted. He should amend his comments. He is a learned man. Such usages have a large repurcussions.". Surendra Kumar, India
- 2. "No one can stop Telangana state". Hanmi, Hyderabad
- 3. "Surendra Kumar, India do u belong to india are taliban students r tnder branches they r rightfully asking for telangana without any violence telangana was a state earlier and v were promised demerger by the then pm and the fazal ali committe before commenting on someone know the history and facts esl should act truthfully and with heart.truth hurts but u hv to face it at the end of the day. jai telangana.". Sastri, Hyderabad
- 4. " Thank's to High court, there is sumbudy to qustion on criminal attitude of police and GOV". Srinivas, Hyderabad
- 5. "this is a shock to andhra govt , acting only to supress the movement by any means and u can imagine if the govt is not concerning about the student in their own campus and beaten up them like animals....what is a kind of discrimination showing here.......stupid andhra cm.they have to feel shame on themselves in behaving like this....the telangana now became more a police state.". Dr.madhava Reddy, Delhi
- 6. "jay telangana". O U Student, Dubai
- 7. "Police officals are really behaving as dyers. The State government should suspend all the police officials immediately.". RAM MOHAN RAO, HYDERABAD
- 8. "i feel that police is have a very tough time in AP with ongoing agitations and so far they have done extremely well. It is important to respect courts as they have final authority but judges should question themselves first - are they maintaining law and order. Are they protecting peoples life, students careers etc. the answer is no. people will realise when these mindless agitators kill some judge etc. ". Ravi, Hyderabad
- 9. "Police force only obey the orders of their masters. Peaceful Demonstration, pickets ". Akhilesh, Lucknow
- 10. "Good that we are able to read as to what had actually happened in court.News papers controlled by politicians are editing and reporting the biased version of court proceedings also...Thanks for the info.Jay Dubey". Jagdish Dubey, Hyderabad
- 11. "#Mr.Ravi and Surendra kumar commented well.Maintaining law ". Srinivasrav Kandaala, Andhrapradesh
- 12. "It is the falt of our system. Thank's to High court, there is sumbudy to qustion on criminal attitude of police and Government.". Joginder, DELHI
- 13. "It is very sad that again the High Court of A.P. has to interfere in stopping the A.P. police bosses to not to commit the excess in the O.U. Campus. We have fundamental right to protest and students have every reason to agitate for formation of Telangana state. Thoug the matter now in the Supreme Court of India, the Supreme Court may also hold the decision of J.Narasimha Reddy who is a judge from Telangana as he knows the plight of people of Telangana. Indian constitution guarantees right to protest under peaceful conditions, but deploying the heavy forces inthe campus is nothing but to surpress the right of students for fightning the Telangana, and our country is member in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights Covenants which also guarantees it is a basic right to protest and the decision of the Govt. of A.P. in regard to heavy deployment of police forces in the OU campus and other Telangana versities canot be tenable. ". Dr.Jetling Yellosa, Nizamabad
- 14. "Justice Reddy deserves kudos for his judgements. The andhra govt. headed by Narasimhan is trying to crush the democratic rights of our people through brute force. This will fail like the Nizams or Mubarak did.". Jai, Telangana
Related Stories
- Supreme Court wants police verifications for judicial appointments after a District Judge is listed as a ‘Rowdy’
- Delhi High Court gets Additional Judge
- Bar vs. Bench in Karnataka High Court: Protest against Dinakaran turns violent as advocates go on a rampage and assault HC judge
- National Law Day Awards - Former SC Judge, Senior Counsels, Law Firm Partners among recipients
- Police modernization PIL; SILF President unhappy with progress
- Bombay businessman files PIL demanding suspension of 26/11 police commissioners
- President Patil proposes woman judge for SC: Jharkand CJ Sudha Mishra under consideration
Other News
- End of Venture Capital Fund Regulations; SEBI notifies Alternate Investment Fund Regulations
- SILF supports Nariman for President of India; Says no one knows the working of the Constitution better
- Re-Upped Round up May 22
- Supreme Court Lawyers Welfare Trust encourages young talent; Introduces 2 annual fellowships
- Re-Upped Round up May 21
- Clasis Law moves to a larger office space in Delhi
- Re-Upped Round up May 18
The Viewpoint: Indemnification Provisions - Is the fight on the indemnity clause worth the effort?
May 17, 2012 | Bar & Bench brings to you the twentieth article on 'The Viewpoint' series with its Knowledge Partner AZB & Partners. AZB Senior Associate Nandish Vyas and Associate Pranati Ishwar in this article seek to examine the context in which indemnification rights are relevant for acquisition transactions, and also seek to explore if there are areas where they are potentially not worth the comments (4)










