Bar&Bench News Network
They say 'No publicity is bad publicity'. With Ram Gopal Varma's panache for controversy, his movies need no publicity stunts.
Varma's latest offering, Rann, is funded by Vistaar Religare Film Fund, a joint venture between Vistaar Entertainment Ventures, a film production house and Religare Enterprises, a leading financial services fund and India's first cinema venture capital fund.
Last year, a song in Rann, titled 'Jana Gana Mana Rann Hai' had the Supreme Court frowning upon the 'remixed' National Anthem. The producers had appealed to the Supreme Court after the Central Board of Film Certification had banned the song. Senior Counsel Arun Jaitley had unsuccessfully argued on behalf of the producers and Varma had to replace the controversial song with Vande Mataram.
In matters relating to Bollywood, it is common to see suits being filed on the eve of the release as we have seen in Kaminey, All the Best, Kurbaan, Jail and several other films. The trend continues this time as well. Sonal Mehta, a freelance journalist and scriptwriter had filed suit in the Bombay High Court claiming breach of confidential information and infringement of her copyright, a week before the scheduled release of Rann. Justice Dharmadhikari had, while hearing another matter remarked, "There is an increasing tendency to file suits against films on the eve of their release. Such moves amount to nothing but blackmail."
IANS reports that Varma has admitted that Mehta had worked with Varma for his production house and had approached him with an idea for a movie on the media. Varma says that he had rejected the idea.
Mehta has engaged Legasis Partners to represent her before Justice Anoop V. Mohta. Senior Counsel Virag Tulzapurkar with Ashish Kamat are representing Mehta. The 8 respondents arraigned by Mehta includes WSG Pictures and Varma. Entertainment law specialists, Naik, Naik & Co., led by Vineet Naik with Ameet Naik, Ravi Suryawanshi and Hemangi Abhyankar are defending. The other two are represented by Kartikeya & Associates led by Off Counsel Venkatesh Dhond with Ashish Pyasi and Vidhee Parekh, and Birendra Saraf with Anuja Jhunjhunwala.
The matter is scheduled for hearing today as both parties are working out an out of court settlement. The movie is due for release on 29 January.
|
Be the first to post a comment 
Related Stories
- Aamir Khan vs CCI: DSK Legal represents; Copyright Panel controversy
- IP Law suit of the year - Oracle Vs. Google: Mofo and Boies, Schiller take lead roles
- Naik Naik gets 2 equity partners and appoints 2 more as partners; Opens Delhi office
- AZB & Partners advise JP Morgan and Goldman Sachs in Tata Power GDR issue
- Anand & Anand notches yet another copyright victory for T-Series
- R&P Partners advise Hinduja's Rights Issue
- AZB & Platinum Partners bring the Hyatt to Bangalore
Other News
- Re-Upped Round up May 21
- Clasis Law moves to a larger office space in Delhi
- Re-Upped Round up May 18
- SC to hear petition challenging appointment of sitting AP High Court judge; Petition alleges deliberate concealment of pending criminal investigation at the time of enrollment
- Linklaters Managing Associate Pranav Sharma to rejoin Amarchand Mangaldas as Partner
- Re-Upped Round up May 17
- Recruitment Tracker: Luthra top recruiter followed by Amarchand and AZB for NALSAR Class of 2012
The Viewpoint: Indemnification Provisions - Is the fight on the indemnity clause worth the effort?
May 17, 2012 | Bar & Bench brings to you the twentieth article on 'The Viewpoint' series with its Knowledge Partner AZB & Partners. AZB Senior Associate Nandish Vyas and Associate Pranati Ishwar in this article seek to examine the context in which indemnification rights are relevant for acquisition transactions, and also seek to explore if there are areas where they are potentially not worth the comments (4)










