Bar&Bench News Network
When 'Mobile Courts' were first launched in 2004 in New Delhi, there were believers and sceptics in equal number. Almost 6 years after the concept was first launched, we have seen Punjab, Sikkim, Bihar, Mizoram, Meghalaya, Assam, Tamil Nadu, Kerala, Haryana, Karnataka, Jharkhand, Gujarat, Uttar Pradesh and most recently, Maharashtra implement the concept of 'bringing the law to one's doorstep' in different avatars.
Yesterday, the acting Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, Justice J.N. Patel launched the Maharashtra State Legal Services Authority sponsored, 'Mobile Van Court' at Mumbra, a suburb of Mumbai. Delhi alone has a minimum of 3 vans doling out a variety of services in slums, unauthorised colonies, industrial areas, etc., including delivering justice, imposing fines and penalties, legal literacy and publicity material on socio-legal matters.
In a country where litigants have been known to die before the conclusion of a litigation, mobile courts are a boon for the litigants, as also the judiciary, which is bursting at the seams dealing with matters relating to petty crimes.
Gujarat, for example, has a mobile court that deals solely with Health and Sanitation matters. Uttar Pradesh on the other hand, has a mobile court presided over by the Chief Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities, dedicated to grievances relating to government policies. Karnataka's mobile court is dedicated to delivering justice to the economically backward, who are exempted from paying the court fee.
These mobile courts, while not yet a widespread phenomenon, have received positive responses across the board. With these courts disposing of over 30-40 matters on a daily basis, these mobile courts have proven beyond doubt that bringing the law to the common man is not a difficult affair. More importantly, they could be just the mechanism to eliminate the large backlog of petty matters pending before the lower judiciary.
|
- 1. "What a joke!! At least with the regular courts, one knows that the court will not just up and go away!!"Uttar Pradesh on the other hand, has a mobile court presided over by the Chief Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities, dedicated to grievances relating to government policies" Since when do Courts rule on government policy??". Napalm, Bangalore
Related Stories
- Allegations of humiliation adds to Judiciary's woes
- Law Minister's Vision Statement- larger judiciary, work till midnight, case not to exceed 3 years
- RTI should not infringe on Judiciary's independence, says AG
- “State Judiciary in shambles”- CJI; Justice Dinakaran asked to go on leave; Justice Lokur takes over as acting CJ
- Moily clarifies on reservations in Judiciary
- New low for Indian judiciary: Judges caught cheating in LL.M exam
- Another instance of defiance against mass judicial transfer by CJI: Delhi HC judge speaks out against "politics in judiciary"
Other News
- Re-Upped Round up May 21
- Clasis Law moves to a larger office space in Delhi
- Re-Upped Round up May 18
- SC to hear petition challenging appointment of sitting AP High Court judge; Petition alleges deliberate concealment of pending criminal investigation at the time of enrollment
- Linklaters Managing Associate Pranav Sharma to rejoin Amarchand Mangaldas as Partner
- Re-Upped Round up May 17
- Recruitment Tracker: Luthra top recruiter followed by Amarchand and AZB for NALSAR Class of 2012
The Viewpoint: Indemnification Provisions - Is the fight on the indemnity clause worth the effort?
May 17, 2012 | Bar & Bench brings to you the twentieth article on 'The Viewpoint' series with its Knowledge Partner AZB & Partners. AZB Senior Associate Nandish Vyas and Associate Pranati Ishwar in this article seek to examine the context in which indemnification rights are relevant for acquisition transactions, and also seek to explore if there are areas where they are potentially not worth the comments (4)










