Bar&Bench News Network
India's first woman President, Pratibha Patil, has asked the Law Ministry to explore the possibility of appointing a woman Supreme Court judge. Sources say that the President's proposal has been received favourably by the Law Ministry, which is mulling the names of several women judges in the High Courts.
This is not the first time that the President has pitched for women's representation in core areas of governance and law and order. The President has been a strong advocate of the Women's Reservation Bill and recently also addressed gender parity issues within the Indian military by recommending the commissioning of women pilots into the combat forces of the Indian Air Force.
The Chief Justice of the Jharkhand High Court, Gyan Sudha Mishra [pictured] is the senior-most of the four women judges under consideration for elevation. The others on the list include Justices Rekha Doshit of the Gujarat High Court, Ranjana P Desai of the Bombay High Court and T. Meena Kumari of the Andhra Pradesh High Court.
The Supreme Court has seen only 3 women judges in the 59 years since its inception. Justice M. Fatima Beevi, who was recently awarded Sthree Vakil Puraskar, was the first woman judge in the Supreme Court, followed by Justices Sujata Manohar and Ruma Pal, who retired in 1999 and 2006 respectively.
The Supreme Court has a sanctioned strength of 31, and currently has strength of 27 judges. The appointment of judges to the Supreme Court and High Courts are made under Articles 124 and 217 of the Indian Constitution, respectively, and do not provide for reservation for any caste, class or person. It is therefore up to the collegium to make a conscious effort to see that women get adequate representation in the Indian judiciary.
Currently, the Delhi High Court has the highest representation of women in the judiciary, with 8 women judges, while the Bombay High Court comes a close second with 7 women judges.
|
- 1. "Admittedly the number of women judges is shockingly too measly in the judiciary. If reservation is to be equitably or distrbutively viewed, so far the benefit has not percolated down to the women and particularly the women in judiciary. By effect of this policy, not only women intellects shall be properly utilized but also justice be not jeopardised. This siren if at all is given by the Hon'ble President shall rouse the giants from the other half of the gender. ". Pradeepta Mishra, Hc Of Orissa, Cttack
- 2. "This is very good news and plasur to know mrs. Gyansudha Mishra became first mahila suprim court judge,mrs. not got any kind reservation(33%)ladies reservation, but grabe our, position from own hardwork". Amit Mishra, Ahemdabad
Related Stories
- Woman Power in US SC: Former Harvard Law School Dean nominated as Judge; Preeta Bansal may be next Solicitor General
- Kishanganga Arbitration: India Appoints Vice President of ICJ and Swiss Professor; Pakistan appoints a Freshfields Group Head and a sitting judge of the ICJ
- Supreme Court of India gets its second sitting woman Judge: 2 other judges elevated
- Re-upped Round Up March 26: President Patil is the true global traveler, Maha govt legislates for equal rights for women and more
- GNLU hosts International Seminar on Women Empowerment; Two-day event has Justice Gyan Sudha Mishra as Chief Guest
- Law Ministry proposes time frames for Divorce cases; Law Commission lobbies for amendment in Christian Divorce Law
- Delhi High Court gets Additional Judge
Other News
- Re-Upped Round up May 21
- Clasis Law moves to a larger office space in Delhi
- Re-Upped Round up May 18
- SC to hear petition challenging appointment of sitting AP High Court judge; Petition alleges deliberate concealment of pending criminal investigation at the time of enrollment
- Linklaters Managing Associate Pranav Sharma to rejoin Amarchand Mangaldas as Partner
- Re-Upped Round up May 17
- Recruitment Tracker: Luthra top recruiter followed by Amarchand and AZB for NALSAR Class of 2012
The Viewpoint: Indemnification Provisions - Is the fight on the indemnity clause worth the effort?
May 17, 2012 | Bar & Bench brings to you the twentieth article on 'The Viewpoint' series with its Knowledge Partner AZB & Partners. AZB Senior Associate Nandish Vyas and Associate Pranati Ishwar in this article seek to examine the context in which indemnification rights are relevant for acquisition transactions, and also seek to explore if there are areas where they are potentially not worth the comments (4)










