Gujarat Assembly passes landmark compulsory voting Bill

Bar&Bench News Network

Dec 22, 2009

The Gujarat Assembly, on Saturday, passed a landmark Bill making voting in elections for local bodies mandatory. The Gujarat Local Authorities Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2009, which has met with severe criticism from the Opposition, also increases the reservation for women in local self-governance bodies from 33 percent to 50 percent. The Bill seeks to amend the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949, the Gujarat Municipalities Act, 1963 and the Gujarat Panchayats Act, 1993.

The Bill makes voting in all local body elections compulsory, except in prescribed cases laid down in the Bill. Those who do not vote will be served notice, and will have to provide satisfactory reasons for failure to vote within thirty days of the election taking place. Penalties for defaulters include deprivation of below poverty line (BPL) cards and government services. The Opposition has objected strenuously to the penalty provisions, in particular, terming them "unconstitutional", and saying that voters must be "persuaded, not coerced."

The Bill also introduces the concept of a negative or zero vote. Persons who do not wish to vote for any of the candidates can cast a zero vote. The practicalities of the system are yet to be worked out, in a set of special rules that are to be framed by the Government later. However, one of the possible outcomes of a negative vote system is that if the number of zero votes exceeds the number of positive votes cast, the entire list of candidates could be disqualified.

Gujarat is the first state to introduce compulsory voting. The objective of the Bill, according to the ruling BJP, is to involve the voters, especially from the lower strata of society and thereby strengthen the democratic process. The Election Commission has currently ruled out the introduction of any similar experiments at the national level, but has said that it will watch the proceedings in Gujarat with interest.

Jasmine Shah, one of the co-ordinators of the Jaago Re- One Billion Votes campaign, feels that not enough thought and public debate has gone into the drafting of this legislation. "The majority of Indians feel that mandatory voting is a good thing," he says, "But I don't think the government has put enough thought into the implementation of this law. A provision for mandatory voting means that there should be a penalty for non-voting. The administration process for compiling the electoral rolls is not yet perfect- many of the electoral rolls, after 62 years, are still full of errors. How then will the government implement the mandatory voting? This will only give rise to corruption within the system," he opines.

The first of the elections for local bodies will take place in October 2010, and will act as the true test of the Bill's on-the-ground viability.

 

Add to My Clips Print this Story Email this Story

 

Facebook LinkedIn MySpace Digg Del.icio.us twitter

Comments(4)
  • 1. "It has been well established by the Supreme Court that the right to freedom of speech and expression guaranteed under the Constitution also includes the negative right not to speak or right to silence. A voter speaks through his ballot and within such a right to express, he has a right to choose not to vote. Why then is a person being forced to vote with the fear of prosecution? The act is in clear violation of all Constitutional guarantees!". Ashish, Gurgaon
  • 2. "In the country like india,not well educated,poverty is there,unemployment and vital socio-eco backwardness..there is no need to compulsary voting.voting is our right not duty.government only can persuade the people cannot force.". Nazia Hasan, Bar
  • 3. "Firstly,Govt. has to prepare the voters'list properly to include all the persons and to allow the persons through the Email voting by consolidating all the data available in the Govt. records of the States ". GVRAMANAREDDY, Hyderabad
  • 4. "I's great illustration of bill for esteblishing democrecy in our country because every citizen should responsible for state and its funtion and should also be well aware of functions of state. Since we are govrend by Rule of Law thus every step in our life has to be governed by law. It is a time to esteblish our duty towards our nation and responsibility for your state therefore compolsary voting would be a milstone for thos who beleive in democracy and who are beleive in value of votes. Furthrmore that when every citizen aware of his power of voting definitely the nation will benefitted. It is also beneficial for choosing a proper candidate and stoping vote casting on various frivilous grounds..Great initiative by Gurjat Govt. ". Brijesh Sharma, Ratlam Madhya Pradesh
Post Your Comment

Name* :

Location :

Email Id :

Comment * :

Notify me when there is a comment


 

The Viewpoint: Indemnification Provisions - Is the fight on the indemnity clause worth the effort?

bullets

 

May 17, 2012 | Bar & Bench brings to you the twentieth article on 'The Viewpoint' series with its Knowledge Partner AZB & Partners. AZB Senior Associate Nandish Vyas and Associate Pranati Ishwar in this article seek to examine the context in which indemnification rights are relevant for acquisition transactions, and also seek to explore if there are areas where they are potentially not worth the  comments (4)

 

 

Thank you. Comments are subject to moderation.