Karnataka Chief Justice P.D. Dinakaran is the protagonist of a story in which he is accused of dastardly acts. He has, in his few public interactions since the accusations, consistently maintained that he is 'not guilty'. For the last week or so, Justice Dinakaran has abstained from hearing matters, restricting himself to administrative duties.

Justice D.V. Shylendra Kumar [pictured], of the Karnataka High Court has publicly asked Justice Dinakaran to cease administrative duties as well. In an open letter issued to the media, Justice Kumar explained his reasons, saying, "If a person exercising such vast powers on the administrative side is a suspect person... whose past conduct and exploits do not inspire the confidence of the people and can possibly misuse and abuse the powers of a Chief Justice on the administrative side also [he should step down]." Justice Kumar had also sought a 'full-court' meeting but Justice Dinakaran had denied permission.

Justice Shylendra Kumar has also been in the spotlight in the recent past when his scathing denunciation of CJI Balakrishnan's stand on the public declaration of judges' assets hit the national media. Sources inform us that Justice Kumar, along with four other judges of the Karnataka High Court, Justices H.G. Ramesh, V. Jagannathan, N. Ananda and Keshavanarayan held a closed door meeting regarding issues relating to the state judiciary.

However, Justice Dinakaran has found support from unexpected quarters like the Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister, Mayawati. Political motivations apart, she has raised several pertinent points relevant to the impeachment debate. In her letter to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, she states, "The manner in which things are moving ahead at present, without giving him any chance to explain his case, is not in keeping with the importance of the matter."

The Congress party has however refused comment on whether or not they will be in favour of the impeachment proceedings. Congress spokesperson Manish Tiwari told news channel CNN IBN, "The person who is impeached is given the liberty to present his case in front of both the houses of Parliament. I don't think there is a case for anyone to take a position, it's far too premature. The inquiry committee has to come to a definitive conclusion, we can't take a position before that."

Justice Dinakaran is yet to refute allegations in detail. He has on a few occasions reiterated his innocence, but is yet to present a case defending himself from specific allegations.