Bar&Bench News Network
Little did Jan Balaz and his wife, Susanne Anna Lohle know that they would eventually be setting legal precedent when they came to Anand, Gujarat to take their twin children- born to surrogate mother Marthaben Immanuel Khristi- back home to Germany.
The Ministry of External Affairs, through the Regional Passport Office, had initially granted a passport to the twins under the 'tatkal' scheme. However, the Ministry of External Affairs later issued a notice withdrawing the passports.
Considering that surrogacy is not recognized in Germany, the Balaz twins cannot get German citizenship if they are not first recognized as Indian citizens. The twins, now almost two years old, have been 'stateless' for the last two years.
Balaz appealed the notice before the Gujarat High Court, which sought to answer the question of whether a child born in India to a surrogate mother, an Indian national, whose biological father is a foreign national, would get Indian citizenship by birth. A Bench comprising Chief Justice K.S. Radhakrishnan and Justice Anant Dave held that babies born in India to the gestational surrogate are citizens of this country and therefore, entitled to get an Indian Passport.
The Government of India appealed the matter, and the matter came up before the Supreme Court of India yesterday. "Statelessness cannot be clamped upon the children. There must be some mechanism by which they get citizenship of some country. Children should be allowed to leave the country after an assurance of their citizenship has been given," said the Bench comprising Justices G.S. Singhvi and A.K. Ganguly.
Posting the matter to December 17, the Bench assured Senior Counsel L.N. Rao, appearing for Jan Balaz, that they would direct the Passport Office to issue necessary documents, "if you can show they will be given [German] citizenship." The Bench also sought an undertaking from the German couple in relation to the citizenship status of the surrogate children in Germany or initiate formal proceedings in Germany. "If there is reasonable certainty of the children getting citizenship, only then we will direct the Ministry of External Affairs [to issue passports]," said the Bench.
The Court also expressed its intention of looking into the practice of surrogacy and framing guidelines to prevent the exploitation of poverty-stricken Indian women who opt to become surrogate mothers. The Court issued directions to the Centre to submit suggestions for the framing of these guidelines.
Advocates Dhaval Dave and P.A. Jadeja appeared for Balaz in the Gujarat High Court. Senior Counsels Dushyant Dave and L.N. Rao, assisted by Dhaval Dave, Nikhil Goel, Sheela Goel and Marsook Bafaki appeared on behalf of Balaz in the Supreme Court. The Government of India was represented by Solicitor General Gopal Subramaniam and Additional Solicitor General Harin P. Raval, who were assisted by Wasim Quadri, Anil Katiyar, Gargi Khanna and Saima Bakshi.
|
Be the first to post a comment 
Related Stories
- Khaitan & Co. represent Mahindra in cybersquatting case
- Looking past the hype: Lawyers Collective v. Chadbourne, Ashurst and White & Case
- Law Minister's Vision Statement- larger judiciary, work till midnight, case not to exceed 3 years
- SC directs Centre to obtain one-time visa for Balaz twins
- Heavy duty counsel in the Deemed Universities Case; Law on Foreign Universities soon
- Foreign Law Firms case heats up: Women Lawyers Association and TN Advocates Association join; more foreign firms to be added to the list
- Competition Commission's first appeal in the Supreme Court in the SAIL vs. Jindal case – ELP represents the Commission
Other News
- Re-Upped Round up May 21
- Clasis Law moves to a larger office space in Delhi
- Re-Upped Round up May 18
- SC to hear petition challenging appointment of sitting AP High Court judge; Petition alleges deliberate concealment of pending criminal investigation at the time of enrollment
- Linklaters Managing Associate Pranav Sharma to rejoin Amarchand Mangaldas as Partner
- Re-Upped Round up May 17
- Recruitment Tracker: Luthra top recruiter followed by Amarchand and AZB for NALSAR Class of 2012
The Viewpoint: Indemnification Provisions - Is the fight on the indemnity clause worth the effort?
May 17, 2012 | Bar & Bench brings to you the twentieth article on 'The Viewpoint' series with its Knowledge Partner AZB & Partners. AZB Senior Associate Nandish Vyas and Associate Pranati Ishwar in this article seek to examine the context in which indemnification rights are relevant for acquisition transactions, and also seek to explore if there are areas where they are potentially not worth the comments (4)










