Bar&Bench News Network
While the Supreme Court's collegium awaits the Survey of India's report on the extent of land that Justice Dinakaran has allegedly encroached, a movement is in progress to impeach him.
Led by Senior Counsel Prashant Bhushan of Campaign for Judicial Accountability and Reform (CJAR) and the Forum for Judicial Accountability (FJA), they are in the process for gathering signatures from the Members of Parliament to move for impeaching Justice Dinakaran. The petition is available here
Apart from the long standing allegations of encroachment of land and income disproportionate to his known sources of income, Bhushan casts doubts on Justice Dinakaran's judicial probity and integrity by alleging irregular and dishonest administrative actions.
Former Advocate General of Karnataka and Senior Counsel, B.V. Acharya, has submitted details of the Ooty property transaction, also detailed in the notice for impeachment. This is probably the first instance where prominent lawyers have taken the cudgels and seeking impeachment. While Justice Dinakaran might claim to be of a clean hand and heart, if any of the charges are proven true, it will open a Pandora's Box as far as he is concerned.
The Rajya Sabha, currently has 245 members, and the Lok Sabha, 545 members. For a notice of impeachment to be successful, the notice must garner the support of two-third of the members of both houses. With Bhushan having to look for atleast 164 members in the Rajya Sabha and atleast 364 members in the Lok Sabha, he surely has his task cut out.
Meanwhile, the principal court hall in the High Court at Bangalore remains empty today like yesterday, as Justice Dinakaran is not presiding since he is in Delhi meeting with the collegium to discuss his elevation.
|
Be the first to post a comment 
Related Stories
- SC allows contempt plea by Salve; Prashant Bhushan faces contempt; calls for impeachment of Justice Dinakaran
- Nariman - Need to change the system; 66 MPs sign Bhushan's motion
- Dinakaran din; Shanti Bhushan protests Rao's inclusion
- 8 out of 16 CJI from 1990 have been corrupt says Shanti Bhushan: Prashant Bhushan to file his affidavit tomorrow
- Round 2: Prashant Bhushan files supplementary affidavit, detailing ‘evidence’ against alleged instances of judicial corruption
- Conversation with Prashant Bhushan
- Anna Hazare’s fast and (Jan) Lokpal Bill draws support from millions: Conversation with Prashant Bhushan
Other News
- Re-Upped Round up May 21
- Clasis Law moves to a larger office space in Delhi
- Re-Upped Round up May 18
- SC to hear petition challenging appointment of sitting AP High Court judge; Petition alleges deliberate concealment of pending criminal investigation at the time of enrollment
- Linklaters Managing Associate Pranav Sharma to rejoin Amarchand Mangaldas as Partner
- Re-Upped Round up May 17
- Recruitment Tracker: Luthra top recruiter followed by Amarchand and AZB for NALSAR Class of 2012
The Viewpoint: Indemnification Provisions - Is the fight on the indemnity clause worth the effort?
May 17, 2012 | Bar & Bench brings to you the twentieth article on 'The Viewpoint' series with its Knowledge Partner AZB & Partners. AZB Senior Associate Nandish Vyas and Associate Pranati Ishwar in this article seek to examine the context in which indemnification rights are relevant for acquisition transactions, and also seek to explore if there are areas where they are potentially not worth the comments (4)










