Bar&Bench News Network
In a bid to grow investor friendly, the Government of India is now planning constituting Dispute Resolution Panels comprising senior income tax officials for a quick resolution of cross border taxation disputes.
The panels are proposed to be set up in Delhi, Mumbai, Ahmedabad, Kolkata, Chennai, Hyderabad, Bangalore and Pune. Currently, an order of the Commissioner goes through 3 appellate stages before it reaches the concerned High Court.
The proposed amendment to the Income Tax Act, if effected, will remove two of the three appellate stages. An appeal from the order of a Commissioner would lie directly to the panel, and an appeal therefrom, to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. Reports indicate that the IT department claims over Rs 2,00,000 crore ($43.15 billion) is locked up at various stages of disputes.
The panel of commissioners is expected to consider appeals from aggrieved tax payers within a month of receiving the draft assessment order. The panel's decision is binding on the Income-tax (IT) department, which is not allowed to appeal against the order before the I-T Appellate Tribunal. However, the tax payer is free to do so. The panel has the power to call for fresh evidence.
There are several cross border taxation disputes pending across the country. More recently, Central Board of Direct Taxes issued a notice to Vodafone calling upon them to pay $ 2 Billion (Rs. 9,485 crore). Clifford Chance has been fighting the Revenue Department for the last 12 years on advice they rendered on an India related project.
The Government has called for objections to the proposed amendment, a copy of which is available here.
|
Be the first to post a comment 
Related Stories
- Amarchand advises on Kotak Mahindra and Evercore alliance for Cross-border M&A services
- Rohatgi in big ticket Bollywood litigation
- Jethmalani wants to cross examine RIL directors; Parasaran denies threat to quit
- SNG step on gas; Hiren Mehta to lead Mumbai litigation practice; Rakhi Shanker returns
- Kochhar declares 2010 as ‘Year for litigation development’; promotes Syed Naqvi
- IFLR Awards: The Winners and those who almost made it
- Divorce made easy – Conversation with Ambika Soni, Information Broadcasting Minister
Other News
- Re-Upped Round up May 21
- Clasis Law moves to a larger office space in Delhi
- Re-Upped Round up May 18
- SC to hear petition challenging appointment of sitting AP High Court judge; Petition alleges deliberate concealment of pending criminal investigation at the time of enrollment
- Linklaters Managing Associate Pranav Sharma to rejoin Amarchand Mangaldas as Partner
- Re-Upped Round up May 17
- Recruitment Tracker: Luthra top recruiter followed by Amarchand and AZB for NALSAR Class of 2012
The Viewpoint: Indemnification Provisions - Is the fight on the indemnity clause worth the effort?
May 17, 2012 | Bar & Bench brings to you the twentieth article on 'The Viewpoint' series with its Knowledge Partner AZB & Partners. AZB Senior Associate Nandish Vyas and Associate Pranati Ishwar in this article seek to examine the context in which indemnification rights are relevant for acquisition transactions, and also seek to explore if there are areas where they are potentially not worth the comments (4)










