Bar & Bench News Network
[ Madhurima Mukherjee, Partner - Luthra & Luthra, New Delhi ]
The much-touted recession appears to be receding and capital market lawyers are once again getting off the bench, and onto some major deals.
2005 saw Rupees 25,000 crores ($ 5.5 Billion) raised through IPOs. Via the same route, 2007 saw approximately Rupees 50,000 crores ($11.1 Billion). However, 2008 saw the market slump by almost 55% with Rupees 20,000 crores ($ 4.4 Billion) being the total capital raised. 2009 appears to be seeing an upswing in the IPO market, and Bar & Bench tracks the trends with a look at the firms working on some of India's biggest IPOs.
The D.B. Corp IPO- Luthra & Luthra; Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom; Desai & Diwanji; AZB & Partners
Luthra & Luthra opens its capital markets account with this 1,000-crore ($220 Million) transaction. The Madhurima Mukherjee-led team comprising Manan Lahoti, Pragati Kumar and Sudha Muddaiah are advising the issue of the Bhopal-based media giant, D.B. Corp. Rajeev P. Duggal & team, from the Singapore office of Skadden, Arps, act as international counsels for the issue. Citigroup Global Markets Private Limited, the underwriters, are advised by Desai & Diwanji. Partners Amit Khan Saheb and Apurva Diwanji lead the team comprising Shyam Pandya and Angad Dhindsa. The selling shareholder, Cliffrose Investment, is being advised by AZB & Partners at Mumbai.
The JSW Energy IPO- Amarchand Mangaldas; Khaitan & Co.; Latham & Watkins
Amarchand Mangaldas, Suresh A. Shroff & Co. are advising JSW Energy on its 3,000- crore ($660 Million) IPO. Yash Ashar, the capital markets Partner at Amarchand, Mumbai confirms that the company is advised by them, but declined to comment further. The domestic legal counsel for the underwriters are Khaitan & Co, led by Partner Nikhilesh Panchal in Mumbai. Latham & Watkins act as the international legal counsel for the underwriters.
The Den Networks IPO- Amarchand Mangaldas; Link Legal; Dorsey & Whitney
Their fifth IPO in 09', Amarchand Mangaldas, through their Delhi office, are representing Den Networks in their 300-crore ($ 66 Million) IPO. Link Legal, New Delhi led by Partner Munish Sharma, Ajay Sahani, Milind Jha and Nidhi Pathania, are the domestic counsel for the Global Coordinator & Book Running Lead Manager and the Co-Book Running Lead Manager with Dorsey & Whitney LLP, London advising them at the international level.
Eight companies have filed red herring prospectuses, three companies their final offer document and about twelve companies have filed their draft offer documents with the Securities and Exchange Board of India. Further signs of the market's recovery are evinced by HDFC's 4000-crore ($888 Million) QIP and Punj Lloyd's 670-crore ($ 148 Million) QIP. Watch this space for more updates on QIP capital-raising.
|
Be the first to post a comment 
Related Stories
- Khaitan & Co advise Cox & Kings in 450-crore IPO
- Khaitan closes 1,000 crore NCD
- Modi government under fire on all fronts, Nariman and Sorabjee back Jaswant
- Wadia Ghandy, AZB in 1,000 crore issue of NCD by L&T
- Rajani advise Akruti City on 300 crore QIP
- M &A market heats up: Crawford Bayley advise Wall Street Finance in its acquisition by Spice Corp
- AZB, S&R and CC Asia on Hathway's Rs. 250 crore IPO
Other News
- Re-Upped Round up May 21
- Clasis Law moves to a larger office space in Delhi
- Re-Upped Round up May 18
- SC to hear petition challenging appointment of sitting AP High Court judge; Petition alleges deliberate concealment of pending criminal investigation at the time of enrollment
- Linklaters Managing Associate Pranav Sharma to rejoin Amarchand Mangaldas as Partner
- Re-Upped Round up May 17
- Recruitment Tracker: Luthra top recruiter followed by Amarchand and AZB for NALSAR Class of 2012
The Viewpoint: Indemnification Provisions - Is the fight on the indemnity clause worth the effort?
May 17, 2012 | Bar & Bench brings to you the twentieth article on 'The Viewpoint' series with its Knowledge Partner AZB & Partners. AZB Senior Associate Nandish Vyas and Associate Pranati Ishwar in this article seek to examine the context in which indemnification rights are relevant for acquisition transactions, and also seek to explore if there are areas where they are potentially not worth the comments (4)










