Bar&Bench News Network
US Attorney for the Southern District of New York, Preet Bharara[pictured], has been shaking up the system since being sworn in less than two weeks ago. On Friday, Bharara brought charges of insider trading against Sri Lankan billionaire Raj Rajarathnam and Indian-Americans Anil Kumar and Rajiv Goel. Rajarathnam is the founder of the Galleon Group, a New York-based hedge fund, and is ranked 551 on Forbes's list of the richest men in America, with an estimated net worth of $1.3 billion.
Bharara, the Indian born American who graduated from Harvard and Columbia law schools, has been praised for his non-partisan approach in the 2006 investigation of the Bush administration's political vendetta in the US Justice Department. Speaking at a press conference, Bharara warned that the Department of Justice was stepping up its efforts against white collar crimes, and said that the Galleon case should serve as a "wake up call to Wall Street and to every hedge fund manager."
Although the case has been receiving a lot of media attention as a war between 'desis', there are several other Americans implicated in the $20 million scam. Mark Kurland, the president of New Castle Partners, another large hedge fund, Danielle Chiesi, a former Bear Stearns executive who now works at New Castle; and Robert Moffatt, an executive at IBM. were also arrested and arraigned by the Manhattan Federal Court.
Rajiv Goel, an executive at Intel Capital and Anil Kumar, an executive at McKinsey & Company have been accused of providing Rajarathnam insider information on Intel and AMD. Rajaratnam has been charged with four counts of conspiracy and nine counts of securities fraud. United States Magistrate Judge Douglas F. Eaton set bail at $100 million, despite the prosecution's objection that Rajarathnam posed a flight risk.
Rajarathnam, who is pleading not guilty, is being represented by Gibson Dunn & Crutcher Partner Jim Walden. Walden is the co-chair of Gibson Dunn's White Collar Defense & Investigations Group.
|
Be the first to post a comment 
Related Stories
- All in the sub-continent: Preet Bharara is lead prosecutor in Times Square bombing plot accused
- Brown collar crime
- Looking past the hype: Lawyers Collective v. Chadbourne, Ashurst and White & Case
- Closing a chapter of history: Holocaust remnant John Demjanjuk stands trial for war crimes
- ValueNotes launches proprietary methodology; top rating for CPA Global, Integreon, Pangea3
- Manupatra launches e-books on Kindle
- RSG launches India Centre; releases report, ranks law firms
Other News
- Re-Upped Round up May 21
- Clasis Law moves to a larger office space in Delhi
- Re-Upped Round up May 18
- SC to hear petition challenging appointment of sitting AP High Court judge; Petition alleges deliberate concealment of pending criminal investigation at the time of enrollment
- Linklaters Managing Associate Pranav Sharma to rejoin Amarchand Mangaldas as Partner
- Re-Upped Round up May 17
- Recruitment Tracker: Luthra top recruiter followed by Amarchand and AZB for NALSAR Class of 2012
The Viewpoint: Indemnification Provisions - Is the fight on the indemnity clause worth the effort?
May 17, 2012 | Bar & Bench brings to you the twentieth article on 'The Viewpoint' series with its Knowledge Partner AZB & Partners. AZB Senior Associate Nandish Vyas and Associate Pranati Ishwar in this article seek to examine the context in which indemnification rights are relevant for acquisition transactions, and also seek to explore if there are areas where they are potentially not worth the comments (4)










