Daily Bhaskar report: NLIU Bhopal Professors guilty for awarding marks to students without evaluating their answer sheets

Bar & Bench News Network

Oct 01, 2011

Dailybhasksar.com a group publication of Dainik Bhaskar has reported that two professors of the National Law Institute University (NLIU) have been indicted for awarding marks to students without evaluating their answer sheets.

 

Dr G S Bajpai and Dr. Moin Mustazhar were probed by a single member committee headed by Justice V.K. Agarwal who is a retired Judge of the Madhya Pradesh High Court.

 

Bar & Bench tried to contact the Director S.S. Singh who was unavailable. Mr. Ravi Pande, Assistant Registar refused to comment on this issue as he is unauthorized to speak on this issue.

 

Dr. G S Bajpai from his bio on the NLIU website is currently Professor & Chairperson at the Centre for Civil & Criminal Justice Administration.

 

Dr. Mustazhar is an Associate Professor (Constitutional and Administrative Law) and has been awarded Pandit Jagmohan Nath Chak Memorial Gold Medal.

 

Daily Bhaskar news report is reproduced below.

 

Bhopal: Two professors of the prestigious National Law Institute University (NLIU) have been indicted for awarding marks to students without evaluating their answer sheets.

 

A single-member committee —headed by retired justice VK Agrawal— probing the allegation, has submitted its report to the director of the university, recommending stringent action.

 

Professor GS Vajpayee and associate professor Dr Moin Mustazar, according to the finding, were guilty of awarding marks to three students who appeared in the PhD entrance test held way back in 2008.

 

In its report, the committee has recommended that the guilty be summarily dismissed to set an example, sources in the university said.

 

Among the five students who appeared in the entrance test, the professors did not check the answer sheets of three students and awarded them low marks so that they do qualify for admission.

 

One was given 7 marks out of 60, the other two 14 and 16.

 

The mark sheets of two others were evaluated by another professor who was also in the panel to conduct the entrance test, sources added.

 

When the issue came to the varsity's notice, the university suspended the two professors on September 21, 2010 and sought their explanation after the preliminary probe found them guilty.

 

Subsequently, they moved the Madhya Pradesh high court seeking direction to quash their suspension on the ground that the university director had no power to suspend them.

 

But the high court upheld the decision of the director.

When contacted university director Dr SS Singh confirmed receipt of the report, adding it would be placed before the nine-member executive council (EC) of the university for its approval.

 

He, however, refused to disclose the contents of the finding saying, "It would be known only when it is presented before the executive council."

 

Speaking to DNA an EC member said the professors y deserved the maximum punishment for ruining the future of students. "They also brought a bad name to one of best law institutes in the country," he said.

 

 

Add to My Clips Print this Story Email this Story

 

Facebook LinkedIn MySpace Digg Del.icio.us twitter

Comments(5)
  • 1. "Does anyone bother about NLIU bhopal. Can we get news about better law schools. ". Krissshhh, Bangalore
  • 2. "NLIU is way better than JGLS ....the student quality in any NLU is 10 times better than JGLS...our achievements are impeccable...I am not from NLIU but consider it a part of the NLU fraternity....JGLS can never be a part of it...I know Krish you are from JGLS which is why i am saying this....". @ Krisshhh, (Unknown City?)
  • 3. "hahahaha nliu hahahaha nliu hahahaha (nliu should leave trimester system, and must adopt Nalsar and NLU, Delhi concept) and also learn from NLU, Delhi that how to manage their time.". Raj, Bhopal
  • 4. "Thanks for reinforcing the concept of elitism of the National Law Schools. JGLS has made tremendous progress in the last two or three years. Any addition and improvement to legal education should always be welcome. I think its high time all of us at National law schools understand that. The Jindal faculty is excellent, and in comparison take a look at this article. Stop taking potshots at people randomly, he didn't even mention JGLS. It's so petty". @Above, (Unknown City?)
  • 5. "@ Raj Bhopal, why do u have problem with the trimester system of nliu bhopal, in the above article there is no talk going on related to the TRIMESTER system so why are u talking nonsense here, and if you are a rational person so every institution has their own problem and all the students have problem with their institution so if you are not from nliu bhopal so you do not have any locus standi to criticize the TRIMESTER system... ". Unknown, (Unknown City?)
Post Your Comment

Name* :

Location :

Email Id :

Comment * :

Notify me when there is a comment


 

The Viewpoint: Indemnification Provisions - Is the fight on the indemnity clause worth the effort?

bullets

 

May 17, 2012 | Bar & Bench brings to you the twentieth article on 'The Viewpoint' series with its Knowledge Partner AZB & Partners. AZB Senior Associate Nandish Vyas and Associate Pranati Ishwar in this article seek to examine the context in which indemnification rights are relevant for acquisition transactions, and also seek to explore if there are areas where they are potentially not worth the  comments (4)

 

 

Thank you. Comments are subject to moderation.